Abdominal trauma during thirty years: analysis of a large case series.

D. Bergqvist,H. Hedelin,G. Karlsson,B. Lindblad,T. Mätzsch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(81)90041-3

IF: 2.687

1981-09-01

Injury

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Toward Alleviating Clinician Documentation Burden: A Scoping Review of Burden Reduction Efforts

Elizabeth A. Sloss,Shawna Abdul,Mayfair A. Aboagyewah,Alicia Beebe,Kathleen Kendle,Kyle Marshall,S. Trent Rosenbloom,Sarah Rossetti,Aaron Grigg,Kevin D. Smith,Rebecca G. Mishuris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787007

IF: 2.762

2024-06-07

Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract:Background Studies have shown that documentation burden experienced by clinicians may lead to less direct patient care, increased errors, and job dissatisfaction. Implementing effective strategies within health care systems to mitigate documentation burden can result in improved clinician satisfaction and more time spent with patients. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding evidence-based interventions to reduce documentation burden. Objectives The objective of this review was to identify and comprehensively summarize the state of the science related to documentation burden reduction efforts. Methods Following Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, we searched gray literature and used Google Scholar to ensure a thorough review. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review, with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies. Data extraction was performed and a table of evidence was created. Results A total of 34 articles were included in the review, published between 2016 and 2022, with a majority focusing on the United States. The efforts described can be categorized into medical scribes, workflow improvements, educational interventions, user-driven approaches, technology-based solutions, combination approaches, and other strategies. The outcomes of these efforts often resulted in improvements in documentation time, workflow efficiency, provider satisfaction, and patient interactions. Conclusion This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of health system documentation burden reduction efforts. The positive outcomes reported in the literature emphasize the potential effectiveness of these efforts. However, more research is needed to identify universally applicable best practices, and considerations should be given to the transfer of burden among members of the health care team, quality of education, clinician involvement, and evaluation methods. No human subjects were involved in the project. Received: 30 November 2023 Accepted: 17 April 2024 Article published online: 05 June 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

medical informatics
Prosthetic wrist. No. 2,457,316.

J. Northrop,M. Nagy

Abstract:
Understanding the perceived role of electronic health records and workflow fragmentation on clinician documentation burden in emergency departments

Amanda J Moy,Mollie Hobensack,Kyle Marshall,David K Vawdrey,Eugene Y Kim,Kenrick D Cato,Sarah C Rossetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad038

2023-03-11

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract:Abstract Objective Understand the perceived role of electronic health records (EHR) and workflow fragmentation on clinician documentation burden in the emergency department (ED). Methods From February to June 2022, we conducted semistructured interviews among a national sample of US prescribing providers and registered nurses who actively practice in the adult ED setting and use Epic Systems’ EHR. We recruited participants through professional listservs, social media, and email invitations sent to healthcare professionals. We analyzed interview transcripts using inductive thematic analysis and interviewed participants until we achieved thematic saturation. We finalized themes through a consensus-building process. Results We conducted interviews with 12 prescribing providers and 12 registered nurses. Six themes were identified related to EHR factors perceived to contribute to documentation burden including lack of advanced EHR capabilities, absence of EHR optimization for clinicians, poor user interface design, hindered communication, increased manual work, and added workflow blockages, and five themes associated with cognitive load. Two themes emerged in the relationship between workflow fragmentation and EHR documentation burden: underlying sources and adverse consequences. Discussion Obtaining further stakeholder input and consensus is essential to determine whether these perceived burdensome EHR factors could be extended to broader contexts and addressed through optimizing existing EHR systems alone or through a broad overhaul of the EHR’s architecture and primary purpose. Conclusion While most clinicians perceived that the EHR added value to patient care and care quality, our findings underscore the importance of designing EHRs that are in harmony with ED clinical workflows to alleviate the clinician documentation burden.

information science & library science,computer science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Enhancing Clinical Documentation Workflow with Ambient Artificial Intelligence: Clinician Perspectives on Work Burden, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction

Michael Albrecht,Denton Shanks,Tina Shah,Taina Hudson,Jeffrey Thompson,Tanya Filardi,Kelli Wright,Greg Ator,Timothy Ryan Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.24311883

2024-08-26

Abstract:Objective: This study assessed the effects of an ambient artificial intelligence (AI) documentation platform on clinicians' perceptions of documentation workflow. Materials and Methods: A pre- and post-implementation survey evaluated ambulatory clinician perceptions on impact of Abridge, an ambient AI documentation platform. Outcomes included clinical documentation burden, work after-hours, clinician burnout, work satisfaction, and patient access. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and proportional odds logistic regression to compare changes for concordant questions across pre- and post-surveys. Covariate analysis examined effect of specialty type and duration of use of the AI tool. Results: Survey response rates were 51.1% (94/181) pre-implementation and 75.9% (101/133) post-implementation. Clinician perception of ease of documentation workflow (OR = 6.91, 95% CI: 3.90 to 12.56, p<0.001) and in completing notes associated with usage of the AI tool (OR = 4.95, 95% CI: 2.87 to 8.69, p<0.001) was significantly improved. The majority of respondents agreed that the AI tool decreased documentation burden, decreased the time spent documenting outside clinical hours, reduced burnout risk, and increased job satisfaction, with 48% agreeing that an additional patient could be seen if needed. Clinician specialty type and number of days using the AI tool did not significantly affect survey responses. Discussion: Clinician experience and efficiency was dramatically improved with use of Abridge across a breadth of specialties.

Health Informatics
Electronic documentation burden among outpatient rehabilitation therapists: a qualitative descriptive study and quality improvement initiative

Jessica Schwartz-Dillard,Travis Ng,Joann Villegas,Derrick Johnson,Mary Murray-Weir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae192

2024-10-01

Abstract:Objectives: Outpatient rehabilitation (rehab) physical, occupational, and speech therapists use electronic health records (EHR), yet their documentation experiences, including any documentation burden, are not well researched. Therapists are a growing portion of the U.S. healthcare workforce, whose need is critical to the health of an aging population. We aimed to describe outpatient rehab therapists' documentation experiences and identify strategies for mitigating any documentation burden. Materials and methods: We used qualitative descriptive methodology to conduct 4 focus groups with outpatient rehab therapists at Hospital for Special Surgery, a multi-site orthopedic institution. Transcripts were inductively coded to identify themes and actionable strategies for improving the therapists' documentation experiences. Therapists provided feedback and prioritization of proposed strategies. Results: A total of 13 therapists were interviewed. Five themes and 10 subthemes characterize the therapists' documentation experience by a feeling that documentation inhibits clinical care and work/life balance, a perceived lack of support and efficiencies, the desire to document to communicate clinical care, and a design vision for improving the EHR. Top prioritized strategies for improvement included use of timesaving templates, expanding dictation, decluttering the EHR interface, and support for free texting over discrete data capture. Discussion: Outpatient rehab therapists experience documentation burden similar to that documented of physicians and nurses. Manual data entry imposes burden on therapists' time and clinical care. Conclusion: A multi-faceted approach is needed for improving therapists' experiences including EHR redesign, technology supporting dictation and narrative to discrete data capture, and support from leadership and regulators.
Elimination of False-Positive Polymerase Chain Reaction Results Resulting from Hole Punch Carryover Contamination

Nicolai J Bonne,P. Clark,P. Shearer,S. Raidal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870802000111

2008-01-01

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Abstract:The collection of biological material (e.g., blood) directly onto filter paper for subsequent use in laboratory assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), has become a common practice. Dried cells or fluid on the paper can be readily rehydrated and retrieved into a standard volume of an appropriate elution buffer but introduces a dilution factor to the sample. The use of a common cutting instrument for excising a standard-sized piece of paper that contains the material also introduces the potential for transferring biological material from one sample to subsequent samples, causing false-positive results by PCR. In the present study, filter-paper-collected blood that contained beak and feather disease virus was used to determine if viral DNA could be transferred between samples by a hole punch used to excise sequential filter papers. It was determined that false-positive results could be obtained at least 13 times after a positive sample. Subsequently, the efficacy of 4 methods of hole punch disinfection, flaming, VirkonS, bleach, and a bleach-ethanol combination, was assessed. The only effective and practical method to destroy DNA was a method where the hole punch was agitated in commercial bleach, rinsed in water, the water was displaced with 100% ethanol and air-dried. This method was simple, cheap, and relatively rapid, and allowed for the use of a single hole punch for a series of samples, without carryover contamination and consequent false-positive results.
The impact of responding to patient messages with large language model assistance

Shan Chen,Marco Guevara,Shalini Moningi,Frank Hoebers,Hesham Elhalawani,Benjamin H. Kann,Fallon E. Chipidza,Jonathan Leeman,Hugo J.W.L. Aerts,Timothy Miller,Guergana K. Savova,Raymond H. Mak,Maryam Lustberg,Majid Afshar,Danielle S. Bitterman

2023-11-30

Abstract:Documentation burden is a major contributor to clinician burnout, which is rising nationally and is an urgent threat to our ability to care for patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, could reduce clinician burden by assisting with documentation. Although many hospitals are actively integrating such systems into electronic medical record systems, AI chatbots utility and impact on clinical decision-making have not been studied for this intended use. We are the first to examine the utility of large language models in assisting clinicians draft responses to patient questions. In our two-stage cross-sectional study, 6 oncologists responded to 100 realistic synthetic cancer patient scenarios and portal messages developed to reflect common medical situations, first manually, then with AI assistance. We find AI-assisted responses were longer, less readable, but provided acceptable drafts without edits 58% of time. AI assistance improved efficiency 77% of time, with low harm risk (82% safe). However, 7.7% unedited AI responses could severely harm. In 31% cases, physicians thought AI drafts were human-written. AI assistance led to more patient education recommendations, fewer clinical actions than manual responses. Results show promise for AI to improve clinician efficiency and patient care through assisting documentation, if used judiciously. Monitoring model outputs and human-AI interaction remains crucial for safe implementation.

Computation and Language
Categorising patient concerns using natural language processing techniques

Paul Fairie,Zilong Zhang,Adam G D'Souza,Tara Walsh,Hude Quan,Maria J Santana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100274

Abstract:Objectives: Patient feedback is critical to identify and resolve patient safety and experience issues in healthcare systems. However, large volumes of unstructured text data can pose problems for manual (human) analysis. This study reports the results of using a semiautomated, computational topic-modelling approach to analyse a corpus of patient feedback. Methods: Patient concerns were received by Alberta Health Services between 2011 and 2018 (n=76 163), regarding 806 care facilities in 163 municipalities, including hospitals, clinics, community care centres and retirement homes, in a province of 4.4 million. Their existing framework requires manual labelling of pre-defined categories. We applied an automated latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based topic modelling algorithm to identify the topics present in these concerns, and thereby produce a framework-free categorisation. Results: The LDA model produced 40 topics which, following manual interpretation by researchers, were reduced to 28 coherent topics. The most frequent topics identified were communication issues causing delays (frequency: 10.58%), community care for elderly patients (8.82%), interactions with nurses (8.80%) and emergency department care (7.52%). Many patient concerns were categorised into multiple topics. Some were more specific versions of categories from the existing framework (eg, communication issues causing delays), while others were novel (eg, smoking in inappropriate settings). Discussion: LDA-generated topics were more nuanced than the manually labelled categories. For example, LDA found that concerns with community care were related to concerns about nursing for seniors, providing opportunities for insight and action. Conclusion: Our findings outline the range of concerns patients share in a large health system and demonstrate the usefulness of using LDA to identify categories of patient concerns.
What makes clinical documents helpful and engaging? An empirical investigation of experience sharing in an online medical community

Ping Wang,Lina Zhou,Dongmei Mu,Dongsong Zhang,Qi Shao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104273

IF: 4.73

2020-11-01

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Social media have emerged as a platform for experience and knowledge sharing in the medical community. The online medical community is garnering increasing research attention; however, there is a lack of understanding of what factors influence the helpfulness and engagement of experience sharing in the community.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Clinical documents manifest physicians' experience and knowledge. This study fills the knowledge gap by investigating what elements of clinical documents contribute to the helpfulness of sharing clinical documents online and what influence member engagement. Clinical documents follow certain architecture to specify their structure and semantics for exchange (e.g., HL7 C-CDA). Accordingly, the structural elements of clinical documents may influence document helpfulness for the online community. Member engagement is one of the indicators of community success. We collected 6,514 clinical documents from a real-world online medical community, and normalized them with the structural elements of HL7 C-CDA. We performed regression analyses to identify the structural elements that have significant impacts on document helpfulness and member engagement.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The results show that some structural elements of clinical documents such as assessment, chief complaints, medications, physical exams, procedures, results, and vital signs sections have positive effects; whereas assessment and plan, general status, history and past illness of patients, instructions, problem and review of systems have negative effects; on the helpfulness of clinical documents. The results also reveal that structural elements such as family history, history of past illness, medication, physical exam, review of systems, and vital signs positively; whereas assessment, assessment and plan, instruction, and result negatively; influence member engagement.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>The findings provide guide on how to improve the effectiveness of sharing clinical experience online. The new and in-depth insights may contribute to the success of online medical communities and the quality of medical decisions.</p>

health care sciences & services,computer science, information systems,medical informatics
Content Analysis of Serious Illness Conversation Documentation: Structured vs. Free-Text Information

Brigitte N Durieux,Seth N Zupanc,Elise C Tarbi,Christopher R Manz,Joshua R Lakin,Charlotta Lindvall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.025

Abstract:Context: Clear, accessible, and thorough documentation of serious illness conversations helps ensure that critical information patients share with clinicians is reflected in their future care. Objectives: We sought to characterize and compare serious illness conversations recorded in two different ways in the electronic health record to better understand patterns of serious illness conversation documentation. Methods: We performed content analysis of serious illness conversations documented in the electronic health record, whether documented via structured tab or free-text clinical notes, for patients (n = 150) with advanced cancer who started a treatment associated with a poor prognosis between October 2020 and June 2022. A multidisciplinary team iteratively developed a codebook to classify serious illness conversation content (e.g., goals/hopes) on a preliminary sample (n = 30), and two researchers performed mixed deductive-inductive coding on the remaining data (n = 120). We reviewed documentation from 34 patients with serious illness conversations documentation in the structured tab only, 43 with documentation in only free-text clinical notes, and 44 with documentation of both types. We then compared content between documentation types. Results: Information documented more frequently in structured tabs included fears/worries and illness understanding; clinical notes more often included treatment preferences, deliberations surrounding advance directives, function, and trade-offs. Qualitative insights highlight a range of length and detail across documentation types, and suggest notable authorship by palliative and social work clinicians. Conclusion: How serious illness conversations are documented in the electronic health record may impact the content captured. Future quality improvement efforts should seek to consolidate documentation sources to improve care and information retention.
Physician Note Composition Patterns and Time on the EHR Across Specialty Types: a National, Cross-sectional Study

Lisa S Rotenstein,Nate Apathy,A Jay Holmgren,David W Bates

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07834-5

Abstract:Background: The burden of clinical documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) has been associated with physician burnout. Numerous tools (e.g., note templates and dictation services) exist to ease documentation burden, but little evidence exists regarding how physicians use these tools in combination and the degree to which these strategies correlate with reduced time spent on documentation. Objective: To characterize EHR note composition strategies, how these strategies differ in time spent on notes and the EHR, and their distribution across specialty types. Design: Secondary analysis of physician-level measures of note composition and EHR use derived from Epic Systems' Signal data warehouse. We used k-means clustering to identify documentation strategies, and ordinary least squares regression to analyze the relationship between documentation strategies and physician time spent in the EHR, on notes, and outside scheduled hours. Participants: A total of 215,207 US-based ambulatory physicians using the Epic EHR between September 2020 and May 2021. Main measures: Percent of note text derived from each of five documentation tools: SmartTools, copy/paste, manual text, NoteWriter, and voice recognition and transcription; average total and after-hours EHR time per visit; average time on notes per visit. Key results: Six distinct note composition strategies emerged in cluster analyses. The most common strategy was predominant SmartTools use (n=89,718). In adjusted analyses, physicians using primarily transcription and dictation (n=15,928) spent less time on notes than physicians with predominant Smart Tool use. (b=-1.30, 95% CI=-1.62, -0.99, p<0.001; average 4.8 min per visit), while those using mostly copy/paste (n=23,426) spent more time on notes (b=2.38, 95% CI=1.92, 2.84, p<0.001; average 13.1 min per visit). Conclusions: Physicians' note composition strategies have implications for both time in notes and after-hours EHR use, suggesting that how physicians use EHR-based documentation tools can be a key lever for institutions investing in EHR tools and training to reduce documentation time and alleviate EHR-associated burden.
Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review

Deborah R Levy,Sarah Collins Rossetti,Cynthia Brandt,Edward R Melnick,Andrew Hamilton,Seppo Rinne,Dana Womack,Vishnu Mohan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2434-5177

2024-10-04

Abstract:Background: Health professions trainees (trainees) are unique as they learn a chosen field while working within electronic health records (EHR). Efforts to mitigate EHR burden have been described for the experienced health professional (HP), but less is understood for trainees. EHR or documentation burden (EHR burden) affects trainees, although not all trainees use EHRs, and use may differ for experienced HPs. Objectives: To develop a model of how interventions to mitigate EHR burden fit within the trainee EHR workflow: the Trainee EHR Burden Model. 1) Examine trainee experiences of interventions aimed at mitigating EHR burden(scoping review). 2) Adapt an existing workflow model by mapping included studies(concept clarification). Methods: We conducted a 4-database scoping review applying PRISMA-ScR guidance, examining scholarly, peer-reviewed studies that measured trainee experience of interventions to mitigate EHR burden. We conducted a concept clarification categorizing, then mapping studies to workflow model elements. We adapted the model to intervenable points for trainee EHR burden. Results: We identified 11 studies examining interventions to mitigate EHR burden that measured trainee experience. Interventions included: curriculum, training, coaching on the existing EHR for both simulated or live tasks; evaluating scribes' impact; adding devices or technology tailored to rounds; team communication or data presentation at end-of shift handoffs. Interventions had varying effects on EHR burden, most commonly measured through surveys, and less commonly, direct observation. Most studies had limited sample sizes, focused on inpatient settings, and physician trainees. Conclusion: Few studies measured trainee perspectives of interventions aiming to mitigate EHR burden. Many studies applied quasi-experimental designs and focused on inpatient settings. The Trainee EHR Burden Model, adapted from an existing workflow model, offers a starting place to situate points of intervention in trainee workflow. Further research is needed to design new interventions targeting stages of HP trainee workflow, in a range of clinical settings.
Physician EHR Time and Visit Volume Following Adoption of Team-Based Documentation Support

Nate C Apathy,A Jay Holmgren,Dori A Cross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4123

2024-08-26

Abstract:Importance: Physicians spend the plurality of active electronic health record (EHR) time on documentation. Excessive documentation limits time spent with patients and is associated with burnout. Organizations need effective strategies to reduce physician documentation burden; however, evidence on team-based documentation (eg, medical scribes) has been limited to small, single-institution studies lacking rigorous estimates of how documentation support changes EHR time and visit volume. Objectives: To analyze how EHR documentation time and visit volume change following the adoption of team-based documentation approaches. Design, setting, and participants: This national longitudinal cohort study analyzed physician-week EHR metadata from September 2020 through April 2021. A 2-way fixed-effects difference-in-differences regression approach was used to analyze changes in the main outcomes after team-based documentation support adoption. Event study regression models were used to examine variation in changes over time and stratified models to analyze the moderating role of support intensity. The sample included US ambulatory physicians using the EHR. Data were analyzed between October 2022 and September 2023. Exposure: Team-based documentation support, defined as new onset and consistent use of coauthored documentation with another clinical team member. Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes included weekly visit volume, EHR documentation time, total EHR time, and EHR time outside clinic hours. Results: Of 18 265 physicians, 1024 physicians adopted team-based documentation support, with 17 241 comparison physicians who did not adopt such support. The sample included 57.2% primary care physicians, 31.6% medical specialists, and 11.2% surgical specialists; 40.0% practiced in academic settings and 18.4% in outpatient safety-net settings. For adopter physicians, visit volume increased by 6.0% (2.5 visits/wk [95% CI, 1.9-3.0]; P < .001), and documentation time decreased by 9.1% (23.3 min/wk [95% CI, -30.3 to -16.2]; P < .001). Following a 20-week postadoption learning period, visits per week increased by 10.8% and documentation time decreased by 16.2%. Only high-intensity adopters (>40% of note text authored by others) realized reductions in documentation time, both for the full postadoption period (-53.9 min/wk [95% CI, -65.3 to -42.4]; 21.0% decrease; P < .001) and following the learning period (-72.2 min/wk; 28.1% decrease). Low adopters saw no meaningful change in EHR time but realized a similar increase in visit volume. Conclusions and relevance: In this national longitudinal cohort study, physicians who adopted team-based documentation experienced increased visit volume and reduced documentation and EHR time, especially after a learning period.
Visualizing Nursing Narratives: An Evaluation of Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling for Care Reports

Martin Danler,Werner O Hackl,Sabrina B Neururer,Lukas Huber,Bernhard Pfeifer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240752

2024-08-22

Abstract:The increasing volume of unstructured textual data in healthcare, particularly in nursing care reports, presents both challenges and opportunities for enhancing patient care and operational efficiency. This study explores the application of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to analyze free-text nursing narratives from inpatient stays in three different clinics, aiming to uncover the latent thematic structures within. Utilizing the R programming environment and the visualization tool LDAvis, we identified three main themes: "Patient Well-being," "Patient Mobility and Care Activities," and "Treatment and Pain Management," the latter combining two closely related but initially distinct topics due to their overlapping content. Our findings demonstrate the potential of LDA topic modeling in extracting meaningful insights from nursing narratives, which could inform patient care strategies and healthcare practices. However, the study also highlights significant challenges associated with the method, including the sensitivity to parameter settings, the lack of updates for key software packages, and concerns about reproducibility. These issues highlight the need for meticulous parameter validation and the exploration of alternative text analysis methodologies for future research. By addressing these methodological challenges and emphasizing the importance of comparative method analysis, this study contributes to the advancement of text analytics in healthcare. It opens avenues for further research aimed at developing more robust, efficient, and accessible tools for analyzing free-text data, thereby enhancing the ability of healthcare professionals to use unstructured data to improve decision making and patient outcomes.
Exploring How Professionals Within Agile Health Care Informatics Perceive Visualizations of Log File Analyses: Observational Study Followed by a Focus Group Interview (Preprint)

Iris ten Klooster,Matthijs Leendert Noordzij,Saskia Marion Kelders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.14424

2019-04-25

Abstract:BACKGROUND An increasing number of software companies work according to the agile software development method, which is difficult to integrate with user-centered design (UCD) practices. Log file analysis may provide opportunities for integrating UCD practices in the agile process. However, research within health care information technology mostly has a theoretical approach and is often focused on the researcher’s interpretation of log file analyses. OBJECTIVE We aimed to propose a systematic approach to log file analysis in this study and present this to developers to explore how they react and interpret this approach in the context of a real-world health care information system, in an attempt to answer the following question: How may log file analyses contribute to increasing the match between the health care system and its users, within the agile development method, according to agile team members? METHODS This study comprised 2 phases to answer the research question. In the first phase, log files were collected from a health care information system and subsequently analyzed (summarizing sequential patterns, heat mapping, and clustering). In the second phase, the results of these analyses are presented to agile professionals during a focus group interview. The interpretations of the agile professionals are analyzed by open axial coding. RESULTS Log file data of 17,924 user sessions and, in total, 176,678 activities were collected. We found that the Patient Timeline is mainly visited, with 23,707 (23,707/176,678; 13.42%) visits in total. The main unique user session occurred in 5.99% (1074/17,924) of all user sessions, and this comprised Insert Measurement Values for Patient and Patient Timeline, followed by the page Patient Settings and, finally, Patient Treatment Plan. In the heat map, we found that users often navigated to the pages Insert Measurement Values and Load Messages Collaborate. Finally, in the cluster analysis, we found 5 clusters, namely, the Information-seeking cluster, the Collaborative cluster, the Mixed cluster, the Administrative cluster, and the Patient-oriented cluster. We found that the interpretations of these results by agile professionals are related to stating hypotheses (n=34), comparing paths (n=31), benchmarking (n=22), and prioritizing (n=17). CONCLUSIONS We found that analyzing log files provides agile professionals valuable insights into users’ behavior. Therefore, we argue that log file analyses should be used within agile development to inform professionals about users’ behavior. In this way, further UCD research can be informed by these results, making the methods less labor intensive. Moreover, we argue that these translations to an approach for further UCD research will be carried out by UCD specialists, as they are able to infer which goals the user had when going through these paths when looking at the log data.
A human centered design approach to define and measure documentation quality using an EHR virtual simulation

Megha Kalsy,Ryan Burant,Sarah Ball,Anne Pohnert,Mary A. Dolansky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308992

IF: 3.7

2024-08-21

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Electronic health record (EHR) documentation serves multiple functions, including recording patient health status, enabling interprofessional communication, supporting billing, and providing data to support the quality infrastructure of a Learning Healthcare System. There is no definition and standardized method to assess documentation quality in EHRs. Using a human-centered design (HCD) approach, we define and describe a method to measure documentation quality. Documentation quality was defined as timely, accurate, user-centered, and efficient. Measurement of quality used a virtual simulated standardized patient visit via an EHR vendor platform. By observing and recording documentation efforts, nurse practitioners (NPs) (N = 12) documented the delivery of an Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) 4Ms (what Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) clinic visit using a standardized case. Results for timely documentation indicated considerable variability in completion times of documenting the 4Ms. Accuracy varied, as there were many types of episodes of erroneous documentation and extra time in seconds in documenting the 4Ms. The type and frequency of erroneous documentation efforts were related to navigation burden when navigating to different documentation tabs. The evaluated system demonstrated poor usability, with most participants scoring between 60 and 70 on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Efficiency, measured as click burden (the number of clicks used to navigate through a software system), revealed significant variability in the number of clicks required, with the NPs averaging approximately 13 clicks above the minimum requirement. The HCD methodology used in this study to assess the documentation quality proved feasible and provided valuable information on the quality of documentation. By assessing the quality of documentation, the gathered data can be leveraged to enhance documentation, optimize user experience, and elevate the quality of data within a Learning Healthcare System.

multidisciplinary sciences
Academic hospitalist perspectives on the benefits and challenges of secure messaging: A mixed methods analysis

Michelle Knees,Angela Keniston,Amy Yu,Matthew Sakumoto,Sara Westergaard,Natalie Schwatka,Rachel Peterson,Aveena Kochar,Andrew Auerbach,Tiffany Lee,Marisha Burden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13522

2024-10-02

Abstract:Background: Hospitals and patients rely on effective clinician communication. Asynchronous electronic secure messaging (SM) systems are a common way for hospitalists to communicate, but few studies have evaluated how hospitalists are navigating the adoption of SM and the benefits and challenges they are encountering. Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess academic hospitalist perspectives on SM to guide future research and quality improvement initiatives. Methods: This was a mixed methods study utilizing an embedded REDCap survey and six virtual semistructured focus groups. It took place during a Hospital Medicine ReEngineering Network Zoom meeting on October 13, 2023. Rapid qualitative methods were used to define major themes. Results: There were 28 hospitalists and one patient representative across 24 separate academic institutions. There was a 71% survey completion rate (N = 20). SM was felt to be an effective and efficient communication modality but was associated with a large amount of multitasking and interruptions. Perspectives around SM clustered around three main themes: SM has been widely but variably adopted; there is a lack of institutional guidance about how to best engage with SM; and SM is changing the landscape of hospitalist work by increasing ease but decreasing depth of communication, increasing cognitive load, and changing interpersonal relationships. Recommendations for SM improvements included the need for institutions to work with frontline workers to develop and implement clear usage guidelines. Conclusion: SM is likely contributing to both positive and negative effects for clinicians and patients. Understanding hospitalist perspectives on SM will help guide future research and quality improvement initiatives.
Clinician Needs for EHR Pediatric and Adolescent Weight Management Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study

Amy S Braddock,Taylor Bosworth,Parijat Ghosh,Rachel Proffitt,Lauren Flowers,Emma Montgomery,Gwendolyn Wilson,Aneesh Tosh,Richelle J Koopman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2283-9036

IF: 2.762

2024-03-08

Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract:Background: Clinicians play an important role in addressing pediatric and adolescent obesity, but their effectiveness is restricted by time constraints, competing clinical demands, and the lack of effective electronic health record (EHR) tools. EHR tools are rarely developed with provider input. Objectives: We conducted a mixed method study of clinicians who provide weight management care to children and adolescents to determine current barriers for effective care and explore the role of EHR weight management tools to overcome these barriers. Methods: In this mixed-methods study, we conducted three 1-hour long virtual focus groups at one medium-sized academic health center in Missouri and analyzed the focus group scripts using thematic analysis. We sequentially conducted descriptive statistical analysis of a survey emailed to pediatric and family medicine primary care clinicians (n=52) at two private and two academic health centers in Missouri. Results: Surveyed clinicians reported they effectively provided health behavior lifestyle counseling at well child visits (mean of 60 on a scale of 1-100) and child obesity visits (63); however, most felt the current healthcare system (27) and EHR tools (41) do not adequately support pediatric weight management. Major themes from the clinician focus groups were that EHR weight management tools should display data in a way that (1) improves clinical efficiency, (2) supports patient-centered communication, (3) improves patient continuity between visits, and (4) reduces documentation burdens. An additional theme was (5) clinicians trust patient data entered in real-time over patient recalled data. Conclusions: Study participants report that the health care system status quo and currently available EHR tools do not sufficiently support clinicians working to manage pediatric or adolescent obesity and provide health behavior counseling. Clinician input in the development and testing of EHR weight management tools provides opportunities to address barriers, inform content and improve efficiencies of EHR use.

medical informatics
The Impact of Collaborative Documentation on Person-Centered Care: Textual Analysis of Clinical Notes

Victoria Stanhope,Nari Yoo,Elizabeth Matthews,Daniel Baslock,Yuanyuan Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/52678

2024-09-20

Abstract:Background: Collaborative documentation (CD) is a behavioral health practice involving shared writing of clinic visit notes by providers and consumers. Despite widespread dissemination of CD, research on its effectiveness or impact on person-centered care (PCC) has been limited. Principles of PCC planning, a recovery-based approach to service planning that operationalizes PCC, can inform the measurement of person-centeredness within clinical documentation. Objective: This study aims to use the clinical informatics approach of natural language processing (NLP) to examine the impact of CD on person-centeredness in clinic visit notes. Using a dictionary-based approach, this study conducts a textual analysis of clinic notes from a community mental health center before and after staff were trained in CD. Methods: This study used visit notes (n=1981) from 10 providers in a community mental health center 6 months before and after training in CD. LIWC-22 was used to assess all notes using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) dictionary, which categorizes over 5000 linguistic and psychological words. Twelve LIWC categories were selected and mapped onto PCC planning principles through the consensus of 3 domain experts. The LIWC-22 contextualizer was used to extract sentence fragments from notes corresponding to LIWC categories. Then, fixed-effects modeling was used to identify differences in notes before and after CD training while accounting for nesting within the provider. Results: Sentence fragments identified by the contextualizing process illustrated how visit notes demonstrated PCC. The fixed effects analysis found a significant positive shift toward person-centeredness; this was observed in 6 of the selected LIWC categories post CD. Specifically, there was a notable increase in words associated with achievement (β=.774, P<.001), power (β=.831, P<.001), money (β=.204, P<.001), physical health (β=.427, P=.03), while leisure words decreased (β=-.166, P=.002). Conclusions: By using a dictionary-based approach, the study identified how CD might influence the integration of PCC principles within clinical notes. Although the results were mixed, the findings highlight the potential effectiveness of CD in enhancing person-centeredness in clinic notes. By leveraging NLP techniques, this research illuminated the value of narrative clinical notes in assessing the quality of care in behavioral health contexts. These findings underscore the promise of NLP for quality assurance in health care settings and emphasize the need for refining algorithms to more accurately measure PCC.
Hypercholesterolaemia – practical information for non-specialists

H. Soran,Safwaan Adam,Jamal B. Mohammad,J. Ho,J. Schofield,S. Kwok,T. Siahmansur,Yifen Liu,A. Syed,S. Dhage,C. Stefanutti,R. Donn,R. Malik,M. Banach,P. Durrington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2018.72238

2017-12-19

Abstract:Hypercholesterolaemia is amongst the most common conditions encountered in the medical profession. It remains one of the key modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and there have been recent advances in the risk stratification methods and treatment options available. In this review, we provide a background into hypercholesterolaemia for non-specialists and consider the merits of the different risk assessment tools available. We also provide detailed considerations as to: i) when to start treatment, ii) what targets to aim for and iii) the role of low density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Abdominal trauma during thirty years: analysis of a large case series.

Toward Alleviating Clinician Documentation Burden: A Scoping Review of Burden Reduction Efforts

Prosthetic wrist. No. 2,457,316.

Understanding the perceived role of electronic health records and workflow fragmentation on clinician documentation burden in emergency departments

Enhancing Clinical Documentation Workflow with Ambient Artificial Intelligence: Clinician Perspectives on Work Burden, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction

Electronic documentation burden among outpatient rehabilitation therapists: a qualitative descriptive study and quality improvement initiative

Elimination of False-Positive Polymerase Chain Reaction Results Resulting from Hole Punch Carryover Contamination

The impact of responding to patient messages with large language model assistance

Categorising patient concerns using natural language processing techniques

What makes clinical documents helpful and engaging? An empirical investigation of experience sharing in an online medical community

Content Analysis of Serious Illness Conversation Documentation: Structured vs. Free-Text Information

Physician Note Composition Patterns and Time on the EHR Across Specialty Types: a National, Cross-sectional Study

Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review

Physician EHR Time and Visit Volume Following Adoption of Team-Based Documentation Support

Visualizing Nursing Narratives: An Evaluation of Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling for Care Reports

Exploring How Professionals Within Agile Health Care Informatics Perceive Visualizations of Log File Analyses: Observational Study Followed by a Focus Group Interview (Preprint)

A human centered design approach to define and measure documentation quality using an EHR virtual simulation

Academic hospitalist perspectives on the benefits and challenges of secure messaging: A mixed methods analysis

Clinician Needs for EHR Pediatric and Adolescent Weight Management Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study

The Impact of Collaborative Documentation on Person-Centered Care: Textual Analysis of Clinical Notes

Hypercholesterolaemia – practical information for non-specialists