Abstract:Genomic complexity is a growing field of evolution, with case studies for comparative evolutionary analyses in model and emerging non-model systems. Understanding complexity and the functional components of the genome is an untapped wealth of knowledge ripe for exploration. With the "remarkable lack of correspondence" between genome size and complexity, there needs to be a way to quantify complexity across organisms. In this study we use a set of complexity metrics that allow for evaluation of changes in complexity using TranD. We ascertain if complexity is increasing or decreasing across transcriptomes and at what structural level, as complexity is varied. We define three metrics -- TpG, EpT, and EpG in this study to quantify the complexity of the transcriptome that encapsulate the dynamics of alternative splicing. Here we compare complexity metrics across 1) whole genome annotations, 2) a filtered subset of orthologs, and 3) novel genes to elucidate the impacts of ortholog and novel genes in transcriptome analysis. We also derive a metric from Hong et al., 2006, Effective Exon Number (EEN), to compare the distribution of exon sizes within transcripts against random expectations of uniform exon placement. EEN accounts for differences in exon size, which is important because novel genes differences in complexity for orthologs and whole transcriptome analyses are biased towards low complexity genes with few exons and few alternative transcripts. With our metric analyses, we are able to implement changes in complexity across diverse lineages with greater precision and accuracy than previous cross-species comparisons under ortholog conditioning. These analyses represent a step forward toward whole transcriptome analysis in the emerging field of non-model evolutionary genomics, with key insights for evolutionary inference of complexity changes on deep timescales across the tree of life. We suggest a means to quantify biases generated in ortholog calling and correct complexity analysis for lineage-specific effects. With these metrics, we directly assay the quantitative properties of newly formed lineage-specific genes as they lower complexity in transcriptomes.

Estimating transcriptome complexities across eukaryotes

Transcriptome Complexities Across Eukaryotes

Nucleotide-level distance metrics to quantify alternative splicing implemented in TranD

Increasing biological complexity is positively correlated with the relative genome-wide expansion of non-protein-coding DNA sequences

Splicing Complexity As a Pivotal Feature of Alternative Exons in Mammalian Species

Transcriptomics in the RNA-seq era

Exon Nomenclature and Classification of Transcripts (ENACT): Systematic framework to annotate exon attributes

Capturing changes to animal complexity from quantifiable patterns in genomic data

Investigating the evolution and development of biological complexity under the framework of epigenetics

The evolution of controlled multitasked gene networks: the role of introns and other noncoding RNAs in the development of complex organisms.

Differential analysis of combinatorial protein complexes with CompleXChange

Uncovering the translatome impact of transcriptome induced diversity in eukaryotes: framework and innovative insights

Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome Across Distant Species.

Methods to Estimate Cryptic Sequence Complexity

Quantifying transcriptome turnover on phylogenies by modeling gene expression as a binary trait

Information Theory of Genomes

Dissecting the transcription networks of a cell using computational genomics.

Understanding Distal Transcriptional Regulation from Sequence Motif, Network Inference and Interactome Perspectives

The conserved landscape of RNA modifications and transcript diversity across mammalian evolution

Integrated entropy-based approach for analyzing exons and introns in DNA sequences.

Diversity and dynamics of the Drosophila transcriptome