The EORTC 22922/10925 trial investigating regional nodal irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer: Outcomes according to locoregional and systemic therapies
Orit Kaidar-Person,Liesbeth Boersma,Peter De Brouwer,Caroline Weltens,Carine Kirkove,Karine Peignaux-Casasnovas,Volker Budach,Femke van der Leij,Max Peters,Nicola Weidner,Sofia Rivera,Geertjan van Tienhoven,Alain Fourquet,Georges Noel,Mariacarla Valli,Matthias Guckenberger,Eveline Koiter,Severine Racadot,Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak,Harry Bartelink,Henk Struikmans,Catherine Fortpied,Philip M. Poortmans
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110563
IF: 6.901
2024-09-28
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:The EORTC 22922/10925 trial aimed to investigate the impact on overall survival (OS) of elective internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer stage I–III. Surgery for the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes, chest wall RT, boost RT after whole breast RT in breast conserving therapy (BCT), RT to operated axilla, and systemic therapy were per physician's preference. The aim of the current analysis is to assess breast cancer outcomes according to different locoregional and systemic therapy used in the trial. Material/Methods Data with a median follow-up of 15.7 years were extracted from the trial's case report forms. Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free and overall survival and cumulative incidence curves of breast cancer events were produced. An exploratory analysis of the effect of the type of locoregional and systemic therapy on breast cancer outcomes was conducted using the Cox model or the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks, both models being adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics and treatment. The significance level was set at 5 %, 2-sided. Results Of the 4,004 patients included, 625 (16%) did not receive any postoperative systemic therapy, 1,185 (30%) received endocrine therapy only, 994 (25%) chemotherapy only, and 1,200 (30%) both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, without differences between the randomisation arms.Administration and type of therapy was associated with age, menopausal status, clinical T- and N-stage and ER status (p < 0.0001). Local control was better with mastectomy (with/without postmastectomy RT) as compared to BCT, but mastectomy was associated with more distant metastasis (DM) as first event. Similarly, DM as first event occurred more in the BCT group that received a boost as compared to no boost and in those who received RT to the lower axillary level. IM-MS RT reduced significantly regional recurrences and improved disease-free survival in a sensitivity stratified analysis. Overall survival was worse with mastectomy as compared to BCT and with irradiation of the axilla but better with sentinel node dissection and adjuvant combined chemo and hormonal therapy. Conclusion Different components of therapy influenced the site of first event. IM-MS RT improved outcomes in different breast cancer outcomes were most probably related that the group were balanced due to the trial arms and stratification methods.
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging