randomised controlled trial women with previous caesarean section: Two decision aids for mode of delivery among
Roshni R. Patel,T. Peters,D. Murphy,Clare L Emmett,T. Fahey,Claire Jones,I. Ricketts
Abstract:Objectives To determine the effects of two computer based decision aids on decisional conflict and mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous caesarean section. Design Randomised trial, conducted from May 2004 to August 2006. Setting Four maternity units in south west England, and Scotland. Participants 742 pregnant women with one previous lower segment caesarean section and delivery expected at ≥37 weeks. Non-English speakers were excluded. InterventionsUsual care: standard care given by obstetric and midwifery staff. Information programme: women navigated through descriptions and probabilities of clinical outcomes for mother and baby associated with planned vaginal birth, elective caesarean section, and emergency caesarean section. Decision analysis:mode of delivery was recommended based on utility assessments performed by the woman combined with probabilities of clinical outcomes within a concealed decision tree. Both interventions were delivered via a laptop computer after brief instructions from a researcher. Main outcome measures Total score on decisional conflict scale, and mode of delivery. ResultsWomen in the information programme (adjusted difference −6.2, 95% confidence interval −8.7 to −3.7) and the decision analysis (−4.0, −6.5 to −1.5) groups had reduced decisional conflict compared with women in the usual care group. The rate of vaginal birth was higher for women in the decision analysis group compared with the usual care group (37% v 30%, adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 0.94 to 2.14), but the rates were similar in the information programme and usual care groups. ConclusionsDecision aids can help womenwho have had a previous caesarean section to decide on mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. The decision analysis approach might substantially affect national rates of caesarean section. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84367722. INTRODUCTION Caesarean section has become an increasingly common method of delivery. From 1980 to 2001 the rate in theUnitedKingdom increased from9% to21%of all births andwasmost recently reported as 23%. Similar increases have been reported in the United States and Australia. 4 An evaluation of caesarean sections by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists reported that first time mothers with term singleton cephalic pregnancies and women with a previous caesarean section account for the greatest increase in rates of caesarean section andmuchof the variationbetween institutions. Higher rates of caesarean delivery are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries are assumed to have been driven by obstetricians, reflecting medicolegal concerns about vaginal birth after previous caesarean section (VBAC), vaginal breech delivery, and fetal distress in labour. In contrast, over a similar time period there has been increased emphasis on involvement of patients in making medical decisions. The traditional paternalistic model of care is based on the premise that the obstetrician knows best and by taking the lead on decisions could reduce anxiety and risk for the mother and her baby. The shared model of medical decision making, in which clinician and patient exchange information, reveal preferences for treatment, and jointly come to a decision, is now promoted in preference to other models. Decision aids are designed to help people select between various treatment strategies by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to a person’s health. A Cochrane review has reported that decision aids can improve knowledge and realistic expectations, reduce decisional conflict, and increase active participation in decision making. A recent consensus process identified key aspects of quality of patients’ decision aids relating to content, development, and effectiveness. Determining the optimal mode of delivery for a womanwho has experienced a previous caesarean section requires consideration of the risks and benefits of Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2AA Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Mercer’s Medical Centre, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland, and Tayside Centre for General Practice, University of Dundee, Dundee School of Computing, University of Dundee, Queen Mother Building, Dundee Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bristol, St Michael’s Hospital, Bristol Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Coombe Women’s Hospital, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee Correspondence to: AMontgomery alan.a.montgomery@bristol.ac.uk doi: 10.1136/bmj.39217.671019.55 BMJ | ONLINE FIRST | bmj.com page 1 of 8 Cite this article as: BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.39217.67101955 (published 04 April 2007) Copyright 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd on 10 July 2007 bmj.com Downloaded from