Abstract:Statement of problem. Screening for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is important in research and clinical practice. The short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index (SFAI) was recently introduced but had only been validated for muscle disorders.Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the SFAI and its discrete and pooled items in relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) benchmark.Material and methods. A total of 866 consecutive participants with TMDs and 57 TMD-free controls (aged >18 years) were recruited. The participants (n=923; mean age 32.8 +/- 13.3 years; women 79.2%) answered the FAI, and TMD diagnoses were derived based on the DC/TMD protocol and algorithms. The 5-item SFAI, which comprised 2 pain-related and 3 function-related TMD questions, was subsequently acquired and assessed with reference to the DC/TMD diagnoses. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was used to verify accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) and the best cutoff points. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were also examined.Results. Pain-related (PT) and intra-articular (IT) TMDs were present in 48.3% (446/923) and 82.7% (763/923) of the participants, respectively. The SFAI demonstrated high accuracy for identifying all TMDs, PT, and IT (AUC of 0.97, 0.99, and 0.97, respectively). The best cutoff points were 12.5 for all TMDs/IT and 17.5 for PT. Sensitivity of the SFAI ranged from 90.7% to 97.5% while specificity varied from 93.0% to 96.5%, with the highest values for PT. As positive predictive values (99.4% to 99.5%) were greater than negative ones (41.7% to 83.3%), the SFAI was better at detecting the presence than the absence of TMDs. With reference to PT, the sensitivity, and specificity of the 2 discrete and pooled pain-related questions (questions 3 and 4), extended from 82.3% to 99.3% and 77.2% to 96.5% respectively. With regard to IT diagnoses, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 56.0% to 98.3% and 86.0% to 98.3% for the 3 discrete and pooled function-related items (questions 1, 2, and 5).Conclusions. The SFAI presented high degrees of diagnostic accuracy in relation to the DC/TMD and can be used for screening TMDs. SFAI scores between 15 and 50 points should be used to identify the presence of TMDs, with scores >20 points specifying possible pain-related TMDs. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:977-83)

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders-INfORM recommendations: Comprehensive and short-form adaptations for adolescents

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders-INfORM recommendations: Comprehensive and short-form adaptations for children

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for children and adolescents: An international Delphi study—Part 1‐Development of Axis I

Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: An international Delphi study-Part 2-Development of Axis II

Reliability and Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in Clinical and Research Settings: A Critical Appraisal

Development and Validation of the Epidemiological Diagnostic Instrument for Temporomandibular Disorders

Predictive model for temporomandibular disorder in adolescents: Decision tree

Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: a survey of dentists' attitudes, routine and experience

TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDER, BODY PAIN, AND OTOLOGIC AND PSYCHOLOGIC SYMPTOMS: THEIR INTERRELATIONSHIPS IN ASIAN YOUTHS

Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis – a Norwegian cross- sectional multicentre study

Pediatric Dentists' Practice Patterns in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Temporomandibular Disorders

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Fonseca anamnestic index for temporomandibular disorders

Temporomandibular Disorders Symptoms in Asian Adolescents and Their Association with Sleep Quality and Psychological Distress

Viability of the quintessential 5 temporomandibular disorder symptoms as a TMD screener

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Thai Oral Health Impact Profile for Temporomandibular Disorders

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in Relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

High prevalence of orofacial pain in juvenile fibromyalgia as detected by a novel tool specifically devised for children and adolescents

Cross Cultural Validation of Oral Health Index Profile for Temporomandibular Disorders in Spanish Speaking Population

Patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and evaluation

Age-related Differences in Diagnostic Categories, Psychological States and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Temporomandibular Disorder Patients

Implementing online learning of Diagnostic Criteria for the Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) protocol in undergraduate dental education