The interaction of aliphatic and aromatic dicarboxylic acids with aspartate aminotransferase.

H. Harris,T. Kalogerakos,A. Evangelopoulos,P. Bayley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ1260020P
IF: 3.766
1972-02-01
Biochemical Journal
Abstract:This phenomenon is not due to disaccharide interaction, because addition of osmotically equivalent amounts of other solutes (glucose, galactose, fructose, xylose, mannitol, urea, NaCl and KCI) also increased the lactosuria after a standard lactose load (40g/133 ml). The excretion of lactulose and raffinose, not hydrolysed in human small intestine (Dahlqvist & Gryboski, 1965; M. Udupihille, unpublished work), also increased when oral loads were made hyperosmotic by solute addition. Decrease in systemic catabolism is excluded, since recovery of these disaccharides from the urine after intravenous administration was almost quantitative (above 80% of 0.5g within 5h). There remains the probable explanation that gastrointestinal permeability to disaccharide and trisaccharide (raffinose) is increased after the ingestion of hyperosmotic solutions. Similar observations have been made on the permeability of frog skin and toad bladder (Ussing, 1966; Urakabe et al., 1970). Consecutive administration of raffinose and lactulose indicated that the permeability increase produced by hyperosmotic urea (21 g/lOOml) was temporary, returning to normal within 2jh (two normal adults). Lactulosuria after hyperosmotic loading (lactulose 5g/lOOml+sucrose 40g/lOOml) ranged from 14 to 39mg/5 h for ten normal adults, showing little increase above the response to iso-osmotic loading (sucrose omitted). In nine subjects with coeliac disease hyperosmotic loading produced greater lactulosuria (60-180mg/5h), although several showed normal responses after iso-osmotic loading. These results stress the relation of sugar-load osmolality to disacchariduria in normal and especially coeliac subjects, and suggest that raffinose and lactulose may be useful as indicators in vivo of gastrointestinal permeability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?