Differentiation of Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarctions among HIV-infected patients requires adjudication due to overlap in risk factors.
Robin M. Nance,Heidi M. Crane,Corey Ritchings,Lisa Rosenblatt,Matthew Budoff,Susan R. Heckbert,Daniel R. Drozd,William C. Mathews,Elvin Geng,Peter W. Hunt,Matthew J. Feinstein,Richard D. Moore,Priscilla Hsue,Joseph J. Eron,Greer A. Burkholder,Benigno Rodriguez,Michael J. Mugavero,Michael S. Saag,Mari M. Kitahata,Joseph A.C. Delaney,Robin Nance,Matthew J Feinstein,Joseph J Eron,Daniel Drozd,Richard Moore,Priscilla Hseu,Joseph Ac Delaney,William C Matthews,Heidi Crane,Peter W Hunt,Greer A Burkholder,Michael J Mugavero,Mari M Kitahata,Susan R Heckbert,Lisa C Rosenblatt,Michael Saag
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/AID.2018.0053
2019-10-03
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Abstract:The Universal Myocardial infarction (MI) definition divides MIs into different types. Type 1 MIs (T1MI) result spontaneously from atherosclerotic plaque instability. Type 2 MIs (T2MI) are due to secondary causes of myocardial oxygen demand/supply mismatch such as occurs with sepsis. T2MI are much more common among those with HIV than in the general population. T1MI and T2MI have different mechanisms, risk factors and potential treatments suggesting that they should be distinguished to achieve a better scientific understanding of MIs in HIV. We sought to determine whether MI type could be accurately predicted by patient characteristics without adjudication in HIV-infected individuals.
immunology,infectious diseases,virology