Abstract:Background: Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer worldwide. In recent years, the frequency to use minimally invasive surgical methods for esophagectomy has been increased, but its real advantages over conventional surgery is still remains. The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy with those who underwent minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy (MIO) to ascertain the feasibility, safety, and clinical advantages of the MIO. Methods: We did a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial in six study centres between April 1st, 2014, and April 30th, 2018. Patients aged 18–75 years with resectable middle and upper esophageal cancer were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive either open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy (Group A) or MIO (Group B). The perioperative outcomes were to compare operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total expenses in hospital, hospital stay, the number and location of lymph nodes harvested and respiratory complications within 30 days. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02355249. Results: We randomly assigned 339 patients to the Group A and 156 to the Group B. No differences emerged in terms of age (year) [(61.52±8.52) vs. (60.25±6.28), P=0.67], the median lengths of hospital stay (day) [(16.28±8.02) vs. (17.15±11.74), P=0.08]. Group A has less intraoperative blood loss (mL) [(241.1±165.8) vs. (274.0±169.8), P<0.05] and total expenses in hospital (Ұ) [(92,076±27,889) vs. (107,669±32,655), P<0.05], shorter operative time (min) [(267±92.2) vs. (364.3±99.43), P<0.05]. While Group B has palpable advantage in the number [(18.30±11.44) vs. (23.08±12.45), P<0.05] and location [(4.30±2.16) vs. (5.44±2.37), P<0.05] of lymph nodes harvested. The proportion of respiratory complications within 30 days was no statistical difference in the Group B [21/156 (13.5%)] compared to the Group A [45/339 (13.3%)] (Chi-square sig =0.934, P>0.05). Meanwhile, the study makes clear that tumour size has no correlation to operative time (Spearman r =−0.014, P>0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (Spearman r =0.078, P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared to open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy, MIO has prominent representation in lymph nodes harvested which is fatal to estimate prognosis and plan sequential treatment plan, although, MIO has some disadvantage such as longer operative time, more intraoperative blood loss and total expenses in hospital which is conflicting to previous observational studies conclusion. There is no statistical difference in respiratory complications within 30 days between the two surgical approaches. Next step, survival rate after 2 years will be analyzed and published after the follow-up work is finished.

Managers ’ Trading Intention and the Performance of Newly Listed Firms

Controlled pilot study of rapid amphotericn B infusions

Surgical Outcomes in Adults with Acute Small Bowel Perforation and Risk Factors for Mortality: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

Mediastinal Transposition of the Omentum Reduces Infection Severity and Pharmacy Cost for Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy.

Initial management and outcomes of nonmalignant esophageal perforations: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis

Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer-the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT)

AB001. Open Three-Stage Transthoracic Oesophagectomy Versus Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial

Laparoscopic Versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

A rigorous re-definition of the plasmal reaction.

Short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in minimally invasive oesophagectomy: A prospective study

Impact of Modified System of Objectified Judgement Analysis (SOJA) Methodology on Prescribing Costs of ACE Inhibitors

Treatment of esophageal perforation in octogenarians: a multicenter study

A rice bran polyphenol, cycloartenyl ferulate, elicits apoptosis in human colorectal adenocarcinoma SW480 and sensitizes metastatic SW620 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - study protocol

Analysis of risk factors for perioperative mortality in adults with small bowel perforation:a case controlled study

Gastrointestinal Surgical Outcomes Study (GISOS): a 30-day monocentric prospective cohort study in Ethiopia

The impact of minimally-invasive esophagectomy operative duration on post-operative outcomes

Complications related to peri‐operative transoesophageal echocardiography – a one‐year prospective national audit by the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care

Surgical management and prognostic factors in esophageal perforation caused by foreign body

Impact of introduction of an acute surgical unit on management and outcomes of small bowel obstruction