Comparing the effects of time-restricted eating on glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes with standard dietetic practices: A randomised controlled trial

Evelyn B. Parr,Bridget E. Radford,Rebecca C. Hall,Nikolai Steventon-Lorenzen,Steve A. Flint,Zoe Siviour,Connie Plessas,Shona L. Halson,Leah Brennan,Imre W.K. Kouw,Rich D. Johnston,Brooke L. Devlin,John A. Hawley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111893
IF: 8.18
2024-10-17
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Abstract:Aims To test the efficacy of time-restricted eating (TRE) in comparison to dietitian-led individualised dietary guidance to improve HbA1c in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods In a parallel groups design, 51 adults (35–65 y) with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and overweight/obesity (HbA1c ≥6.5 % (48 mmol/mol), BMI ≥25-≤40 kg/m 2 ) commenced a six-month intervention. Following baseline, participants were randomised to TRE (1000–1900 h) or DIET (individualised dietetic guidance) with four consultations over four months. Changes in HbA1c (primary), body composition, and self-reported adherence (secondary) were analysed using linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 0.3 % (4 mmol/mol) HbA1c was set a priori . Results Forty-three participants (56 ± 8 y, BMI: 33 ± 5 kg/m 2 , HbA1c: 7.6 ± 0.8 %) completed the intervention. HbA1c was reduced (P = 0.002; TRE: −0.4 % (−5 mmol/mol), DIET: −0.3 % (−4 mmol/mol)) with no group or interaction effects; TRE was non-inferior to DIET (−0.11 %, 95 %CI: −0.50 % to 0.28 %). Body mass reduced in both groups (TRE: −1.7 kg; DIET: −1.2 kg) via ∼900 kJ/d spontaneous energy reduction (P < 0.001). Self-reported adherence was higher in TRE versus DIET (P < 0.001). Conclusions When individualised dietary guidance is not available, effective, and/or suitable, TRE may be an alternative dietary strategy to improve glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?