Serum albumin-adjusted glycated albumin as a better indicator of glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with short duration of hemodialysis.

Takahiro Yajima,Kumiko Yajima,M. Hayashi,Hiroshi Takahashi,K. Yasuda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.05.020

IF: 8.18

2017-08-01

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Evaluating quality, understandability, and actionability of YouTube content for gender affirming surgery

Alexandra E. Hunter,Reade A. Otto-Moudry,Cynthia T. Yusuf,Rena D. Malik,Rachel A. Moses

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8872

2024-08-30

Canadian Urological Association Journal

Abstract:Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate YouTube content about metoidioplasty on completeness of perioperative information, actionability, understandability, degree of misinformation, quality, and presence of commercial bias. Methods: A YouTube search for “Metoidioplasty” was conducted and the first 100 video results were watched by five independent reviewers. Videos in English <30 minutes in length were included and videos primarily showing surgical footage were excluded. Videos were evaluated between January 2022 and June 2022. Each video was evaluated for presenter demographics, channel/video statistics, and whether it covered topics including anatomy, treatment options, outcomes, procedure risks, and misinformation, and whether it had a clickbait title. Calculated scores for validated DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) metrics were the primary outcome variables used to quantify quality, actionability, and understandability. For PEMAT, a cutoff of 75% was used to differentiate between “poor” versus “good/sufficient.” Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were performed to assess correlations among primary outcome variables and other variables. Results: Of the 79 videos analyzed, 24% (n=19) were of high quality; 99% (n=78) had poor understandability and 100% (n=79%) had poor actionability. Patients/consumers were the most common publisher type (n=71, 90%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates metoidioplasty content available on YouTube is not comprehensive and is of poor quality, and poor actionability and understandability, demonstrating a clear need for more relevant, accessible, comprehensible, and accurate content.

urology & nephrology
Gynecomastia Surgery Patient Education

Praneet S. Paidisetty,Leonard K. Wang,Ashley Shin,Jacob Urbina,David Mitchell,Amy Quan,Chioma G. Obinero,Wendy Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000003813

2024-02-26

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Abstract:Background YouTube is a platform for many topics, including plastic surgery. Previous studies have shown poor educational value in YouTube videos of plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and accuracy of YouTube videos concerning gynecomastia surgery (GS). Methods The phrases “gynecomastia surgery” (GS) and “man boobs surgery” (MB) were queried on YouTube. The first 50 videos for each search term were examined. The videos were rated using our novel Gynecomastia Surgery Specific Score to measure gynecomastia-specific information, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) to measure understandability and actionability, and the Global Quality Scale to measure general quality. Results The most common upload source was a board-certified plastic surgeon (35%), and content category was surgery techniques and consultations (51%). Average scores for the Global Quality Scale (x̄ = 2.25), Gynecomastia Surgery Specific Score (x̄ = 3.50), and PEMAT Actionability (x̄ = 44.8%) were low, whereas PEMAT Understandability (x̄ = 77.4%) was moderate to high. There was no difference in all scoring modalities between the GS and MB groups. Internationally uploaded MB videos tended to originate from Asian countries, whereas GS videos tended to originate from non-US Western countries. Patient uploaders had higher PEMAT Actionability scores than plastic surgeon uploaders. Conclusions The quality and amount of gynecomastia-specific information in GS videos on YouTube are low and contain few practical, take-home points for patients. However, understandability is adequate. Plastic surgeons and professional societies should strive to create high-quality medical media on platforms such as YouTube.

surgery
Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading

Patrick Betschart,Manolis Pratsinis,Gautier Müllhaupt,Roman Rechner,Thomas RW Herrmann,Christian Gratzke,Hans–Peter Schmid,Valentin Zumstein,Dominik Abt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14971

2020-04-01

BJU International

Abstract:ObjectivesTo assess the quality of videos on surgical treatment on YouTube, since video sharing platforms are used very frequently as sources of patient information and the therapeutic landscape of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) substantially evolved during the last years. Materials and MethodsA systematic search for videos on YouTube addressing treatment options of LUTS/BPH was performed in May 2019. Assessed parameters included basic data (e.g., number of views), grade of misinformation and reporting of conflicts of interest. Quality of content was analyzed using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. ResultsA total of 159 videos with median 8'570 views (648 – 2'384'391) were included to the analysis. Only 21 videos (13.2%) were rated to contain no misinformation, 26 (16.4%) were free of commercial bias, and two (1.3%) disclosed potential conflicts of interest. According to DISCERN, the median overall quality of the videos was low (2 out of 5 points for question 16). Only four out of the 15 assessed categories (i.e., bipolar and Holmium laser enucleation, transurethral resection and patient based search terms) reached a moderate median overall quality (3 points). ConclusionMost videos about surgical treatment of LUTS/BPH on YouTube have a low quality of content, provide misinformation, are subject to commercial bias and do not report on conflicts of interest. These findings emphasize the importance of thorough doctor‐patient communication and active recommendation of unbiased patient education materials.

urology & nephrology
Mid-urethral slings on YouTube: quality information on the internet?

Maryse Larouche,Roxana Geoffrion,Darren Lazare,Aisling Clancy,Terry Lee,Nicole A. Koenig,Geoffrey W. Cundiff,Lynn Stothers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2908-1

2015-12-09

International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesisScant literature exists about the quality of urogynecological content on social media. Our objective was to measure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of YouTube videos related to mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures.MethodsYouTube was searched using the terms “mid-urethral sling,” “vaginal tape,” “TVT,” “TOT,” “TVT surgery,” and “TOT surgery.” Duplicates and videos with less than 1,000 views were excluded. We developed a standardized questionnaire for this project, assessing each video’s target audience, main purpose, relevance, informed consent elements, surgical steps, and bias. The primary outcome was the presence of all elements of informed consent. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was calculated using the Fleiss’ kappa statistic. Descriptive statistics were also obtained.ResultsFive reviewers each rated 56 videos. Mean IRR was moderate (Fleiss’ kappa 0.58 ± 0.24). Video content was classified as physician educational material (67.9 %), patient information (16.1 %), advertisement (10.7 %), lawsuit recruitment (1.8 %), and unclear (3.6 %). MUS was the primary topic for 82.1 % of the videos. The remainder discussed other types of anti-incontinence procedures or prolapse surgery. None of the videos mentioned all four elements of informed consent. Of 32 videos demonstrating surgical technique, none showed the complete list of pre-determined surgical steps. The mean number of listed steps was 7.6/16. Only four videos mentioned at least one post-operative patient instruction. A marketing element was shown in 26.8 % of videos.ConclusionsPatient information about MUS on YouTube is lacking and often biased. Physicians and students viewing YouTube videos for educational purposes should be cognizant of the variability in the surgical steps demonstrated.

urology & nephrology,obstetrics & gynecology
Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Penis Enlargement Surgery

Perçin Karakol,Tuncay Tas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33425/2689-1093.1039

2022-06-30

Surgical Research

Abstract:Background: An increasing number of patients and their aesthetic curiosity are causing the online questioning of penis enlargement surgery (PES). Although there is a wealth of healthcare information about PES on the internet, the quality of PES-related information on YouTube, the most visited online video streaming service, has not fully known. It is aimed to evaluate the quality of information about PES in YouTube videos. Materials and Methods: In January 2021, we cross-sectionally performed YouTube search using the keywords "penis enlargement surgery", "penis lengthening surgery", or "penis thickening surgery". We sorted the videos as reliability in terms of containing scientifically proven information by 1 urologist and 1 plastic surgeon. Irrelevant, non-Turkish, and silent videos were not included. Video demographics were analyzed based on the quality and source of the video. A 5-point global quality scale, a 5-point reliability (DISCERN) tool, kappa statistic, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and descriptive statistics in the form of proportions and percentages were used. Results: A total of one-hundred PES videos published on YouTube between 2015-2021 were searched. Thirty-nine of these videos were removed due to duplicate, irrelevant, lack of sound or misleading information. Deceptive videos had a significantly higher number of likes than useful videos. On the other hand, useful videos had significantly more views than misleading videos. Useful videos had a higher DISCERN score compared to misleading videos. The fact that the uploader was sourced by professionals and doctors working at universities significantly contributed to the usefulness of the videos. Conclusion: As searching for information about PES on YouTube, patients are exposed to low-quality and confusing videos. Complexity in the number of views and likes could make accessing the informative PES video difficult. It may be recommended that patients prefer PES videos created by professionals.
[WHO activities in the epidemiology of dental caries (author's transl)].

J. Sardo-Infirri,D. Barmes

1980-04-30

Abstract:The WHO program on the epidemiology of dental caries is presented: the activities undertaken in this program include the elaboration of appropriate methodology, the collection and classification of data to be used for planning services, and assistance to countries in planning and executing surveys of dental and oral health. Information available in the WHO Data Bank on the worldwide pattern of oral and dental diseases in developing and technically developed countries are studied, as well as the trends in the prevalence of caries. The WHO program of oral and dental disease prevention, started because of the increase in prevalence of caries in developing countries, is described briefly.
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube

Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu,Abdulcabbar Kartal,Ugur Ekici,Alp Gurkan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2

2019-02-01

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:BackgroundThe internet is a widely used source for obtaining medical information both by patients and physicians. YouTube® is a valuable information resource which can improve the learning experience of both public and medical professionals if appropriately used. In this study, we want to evaluate quality and accuracy of videos about sleeve gastrectomy procedure.MethodsWe included the first 100 videos returned by YouTube® search engine in response to “sleeve gastrectomy” keyword query to the study. The popularity of the videos was evaluated with an index called the video power index (VPI). Educational quality of videos was measured using the DISCERN score (DISCERN), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMAS) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Scores (GQS). The technical quality was measured by Sleeve Gastrectomy Scoring System (SGSS) which was utilized by three bariatric surgeons.ResultsThe source in 31% of the videos was a patient. The content in 53% of the videos was surgical technique. According to sources, videos uploaded by a university-affiliated physician had significantly higher DISCERN, JAMAS, GQS, and SGSS scores. Videos uploaded by a university-affiliated physician also had lower video power index than videos uploaded by patients. Surgical technique videos had significantly higher DISCERN, JAMAS, GQS, and SGSS scores. Patient experiences and advertisement videos had higher VPI scores. Also, negative correlations were found between video power index and JAMAS, GQS, and SGSS scores.ConclusionsOnline information on sleeve gastrectomy is of low quality, and its contents are of unknown source and accuracy. However, educational potential of YouTube® cannot be ignored.

surgery
Trauma in pregnancy: uterine rupture.

L. Manley,S. Santanello

IF: 2.303

1991-10-01

Journal of Emergency Nursing

Abstract:Trauma during pregnancy is a unique situation. Understanding injury patterns, anatomic and physiologic changes, and the initial approach to resuscitation is essential for all emergency nurses. Maternal resuscitation is the only means of fetal resuscitation. Meticulous attention must be given to the ABC's, with some minor modifications. Cervical spine immobilization is done in conjunction with positioning on the left side. Oxygen is used liberally, but may not benefit the fetus if hypovolemia exists. IV access and aggressive fluid resuscitation should proceed quickly. Diagnostic testing, including radiologic evaluation, is performed as necessary--the mother's life must not be jeopardized on the basis of fetal risk. Continuous fetal monitoring should be instituted, even with seemingly minor injuries. In the rare event of maternal arrest, a postmortem cesarean section may be lifesaving for the infant. Policies should be formulated jointly by ED, obstetric, and neonatal staffs in advance to speed this difficult decision-making process. The keys to survival, for both mother and infant, are an organized approach to resuscitation and teamwork among all professionals.
An Analysis of Male Plastic Surgery Content on TikTok

Evan Rothchild,Daniel Chernovolenko,Fei Wang,Joseph A Ricci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad350

2024-04-04

Abstract:Background: TikTok is a powerful and popular source of patient education. However, the lack of content regulation raises concerns about the spread of medical misinformation. Objectives: We aimed to analyze the source, content, quality, and reliability of TikTok posts focusing on surgical and nonsurgical cosmetic treatments for men. Methods: A search was conducted on TikTok with 16 popular hashtags related to male cosmetic procedures. The top 25 male-focused videos from each hashtag were chosen for analysis. Videos were categorized by content creator, video type, and descriptive metrics. Educational videos were evaluated for quality with the validated modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) score and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) scale. Statistical analysis was performed with univariate and linear regression models. Results: The included 399 videos totaled 389 million views, 16.4 million likes, 174,594 comments, and 586,743 shares. Most videos were uploaded by plastic and reconstructive surgeons (38.3%). A significant number (38%) of videos by physicians were posted by international physicians, with videos by United States physicians receiving fewer views, comments, and shares than videos posted by international physicians. Patient experience was the most common video category (48.9%). Educational videos had low overall quality, with physician-created videos demonstrating higher DISCERN and PEMAT scores but lower engagement compared to nonphysician videos. Conclusions: The quality of TikTok videos on male cosmetic surgery was generally low, emphasizing the importance of accurate information dissemination by physicians on social media. The strong presence of international physicians highlights the potential implications of social media on medical tourism.
Consulting "Dr. YouTube": an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website

Amr Salama,Janet Panoch,Elhaam Bandali,Aaron Carroll,Sarah Wiehe,Stephen Downs,Mark P Cain,Richard Frankel,Katherine H Chan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.11.011

Abstract:Introduction: Parents who make decisions about hypospadias repair for their child may seek information from online platforms such as YouTube. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the health literacy demand of hypospadias videos on YouTube using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). Study design: We performed a YouTube search using the term "hypospadias," limiting results to the first 100 videos. We excluded videos that were <1 min or >20 min and videos that were not in English or did not include subtitles. Two evaluators independently examined videos and determined PEMAT-A/V scores for understandability and actionability (i.e., ability to identify actions the viewer can take). Videos with scores >70% are understandable or actionable. The inter-rater reliability (kappa) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of PEMAT scores were calculated. Bivariate and multivariable linear regression models assessed the association of video characteristics with respective scores. Results: Of the 100 videos that were identified on YouTube, 47 (47%) were excluded leaving 53 for analysis: 14 were >20 min, 14 were <1 min, 9 had no audio or subtitles, 7 were not in English, 1 was a duplicate, 1 was unrelated to hypospadias, and 1 was deleted at the time of data analysis. Three (5.6%) were understandable (mean score 54.5%, standard deviation (SD) 14.9) and eight (15.1%) were actionable (mean score 21.8%, SD 16.6) (Extended Summary Figure). Kappa values ranged from 0.4 to 1. The ICC's were 0.55 and 0.33 for understandability and actionability, respectively. In the bivariate analysis, mean understandability scores were significantly higher for English language videos (p = 0.04), videos with animation (p = 0.002), and those produced by industry (p = 0.02). In the multivariable analysis, mean understandability scores were significantly higher for "expert testimonial" or "other" video types after adjusting for graphics type and overall tone (p = 0.04). Mean understandability scores were also significantly higher for videos with animation after adjusting for video type and overall tone (p = 0.01). Mean actionability scores were significantly higher for videos with a negative tone (p = 0.01). Discussion: The vast majority of hypospadias-related YouTube content is not appropriate for users with low health literacy although certain types of videos, such those with animation and expert testimonials, scored higher on understandability than other types. Conclusion: Due to the lack of sufficient online informational content regarding hypospadias, we plan to engage parents of sons with hypospadias in the development of high-quality patient educational materials about hypospadias.
Assessment of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Content on YouTube

Mohammed D Akbar,Abdul K Taufique,Daniyaal A Kamran,Abdul R Harris,James Lyons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63857

2024-07-04

Cureus

Abstract:Background: Online video hosting websites such as YouTube have been increasingly used by medical institutions to spread information about new and exciting topics. However, due to the large number of videos uploaded daily and the lack of peer review, few attempts have been made to assess the quantity and quality of information that is uploaded on YouTube. For this study, our team assessed the available content on the transoral robotic surgery (TORS) procedure. Methods: A qualitative case study model was employed. Videos related to TORS were collected using a unified search protocol. Each video was then analyzed, and metrics of the following data points were collected: views, likes, comments, upload date, length of video, author type, author, and region of origin. Each dataset was analyzed by two distinct authors, and interrater reliability was calculated. Quantitative and qualitative statistics were curated. Results: A total of 124 videos were analyzed for this review. The breakdown of videos was as follows: 15.32% (19) in the educational for patients category, 16.94% (21) in the educational for trainees category, 30.65% (38) in the procedural overview category, 8.87% (11) in the patient experience (PE) category, 10.48% (13) in the promotional category, 12.10% (15) in the other category, and 5.65% (7) in the irrelevant (IR) category. The total number of views across all videos analyzed was 2,589,561. The total number of likes was 14,827, and the total number of comments was 2,606. The average video length was 8.63 minutes. The most viewed category was the PE category at 1,014,738 and the most liked at 1,714. The least viewed category was IR at 21,082. The PE category had the most engagement based on combined comments and likes. The most watched video, with 774,916 views, was in the PE category under the "TORS for Thyroidectomy" search term and was titled "Thyroid Surgery (Thyroidectomy)." Conclusion: As the prevalence of online videos regarding medical devices, procedures, and treatments increases, patients and trainees alike will look toward resources such as YouTube to augment their understanding. Patients, providers, and medical education platforms should take heed of the promise and pitfalls of medical content on YouTube.
Hepatotoxicity to sodium valproate: a review.

P. Powell‐Jackson,J. Tredger,R. Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.25.6.673

IF: 24.5

1984-06-01

Gut

Abstract:Since 1978 a number of reports have indicated a possible association between sodium valproate therapy and the occurrence of hepatitis. In this review we have analysed, with particular reference to the clinical presentation, course and coadministration of other drugs, the 42 cases with fatal hepatitis either known to the manufacturers or reported elsewhere,'11 and the more frequent cases with milder forms of hepatitis varying in severity from a transient rise in aminotransferase activities to symptomatic cases with reversible hepatic failure.12-30 We have also considered the three reported cases with a Reye's-like syndrome2 9 31 and 22 instances of hyperammonaemia32-38 which is usually found in the absence of clinical evidence of hepatic injury but can easily be confused with fulminant hepatic failure. Possible mechanisms for the hepatotoxicity in relation to recently reported experimental work and the value of liver function tests in monitoring valproate therapy are also considered.
Acute changes in osmolality and renin and respiratory control of arterial PCO2 and [H+].

J. Anderson,I. Sarda,D. B. Jennings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(90)90002-G

1990-04-01

Respiration Physiology

Abstract:
Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source

Bengisu Tufekci,Ozlem Basgut,Omer Bayrak,Aliye Bulut

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05932-y

2024-09-24

Abstract:Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study is to examine the quality and content characteristics of educational videos on the use of vaginal cones published on YouTube. Methods: Video searches were conducted on the YouTube website using the keyword "usage of vaginal cones". A total of 52 videos were included in the current study. Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scales were used to evaluate the reliability of the videos, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) was used for quality and usefulness. Results: As a result of the content analysis conducted, it was observed that 29 videos were classified as having "poor content" and 23 as "rich content." When we examined the sources of the videos (n = 52), it was found that the majority (58%, n = 30) were produced by nonhealth care sources (medical companies and nonhealth professionals). With statistical significance in mDISCERN and GQS (p = 0.014, p = 0.036), physiotherapists were found to have the highest average scores (4.11 ± 1.05, 3.44 ± 0.73) whereas doctors ranked second in the average standard deviation (3.09 ± 1.04, 2.82 ± 0.98). In JAMA, medical companies were found to have the highest average score with statistical significance (p = 0.015) at 3.4 ± 0.74, followed by doctors at 3 ± 1, and physiotherapists at 2.89 ± 0.78 when averages were analyzed. Conclusion: It is clearly evident that there is a need for higher quality and more reliable vaginal cone content database on YouTube. It is important for patients to be guided by health care professionals and informed about quality content criteria in order to access quality, reliable, and useful information.
Social Media Videos on Contraceptive Implants: An Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability

Bengü Mutlu Sütcüoğlu,Melike Güler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2023.08.004

Abstract:Study objective: There are many videos on contraception on YouTube and TikTok, and women around the world use video platforms extensively to seek health information from videos of uncertain reliability and quality. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the scientific reliability and quality of the most popular social media videos about contraceptive subdermal implants. Methods: TikTok and YouTube videos were assessed separately by two gynecologists. The video quality was evaluated according to the DISCERN score, modified DISCERN score, and Global Quality Scale (GQS) score. Results: The study included the 100 most popular videos, 44 of which were uploaded by health care professionals. The median DISCERN score for videos shared by health care professionals was 50 (range 15-75), whereas it was 22 (range 15-56) for videos shared by independent users (P < .001). The median modified DISCERN score was 4 (min-max 0-5), and the median GQS score was 4 (min-max 1-5) for the videos uploaded by health care professionals. The modified DISCERN and GQS scores of TikTok videos were lower than those of YouTube videos (both P < .001). Conclusion: Social media videos about contraceptive subdermal implants are popular and have been viewed tens of thousands of times, but the overall medical validity, which we evaluated according to the scoring systems, was poor. Despite the large number of videos, the content's quality and reliability are quite limited. There is a need to prioritize the education provided to patients by gynecologists, as well as to create high-quality content for YouTube and other similar platforms.
Radical Prostatectomy on YouTube: Education or Disinformation?

Fabian P Siegel,Timur H Kuru,Katharina Boehm,Marianne Leitsmann,Kai Alexander Probst,Julian P Struck,Johannes Huber,Hendrik Borgmann,Johannes Salem,Fabian P. Siegel,Timur H. Kuru,Julian P. Struck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237610.92

2023-01-01

Archivos Españoles de Urología

Abstract:BACKGROUND: YouTube is the second most popular website worldwide. It features numerous videos about radical prostatectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of these videos and screen their benefit for patients and doctors.METHODS: All videos on YouTube about radical prostatectomy were analysed using a specially developed software (python 2.7, numpy). According to a predefined selection process most relevant videos were analyzed for quality and reliability using Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM)-Score, Global Quality Score and others.RESULTS: Out of 3520 search results, 179 videos were selected and analysed. Videos were watched a median of 5836 times (interquartile range (IQR): 11945.5; 18-721546). The median duration was 7.2 minutes (min). 125 of the videos were about robotic prostatectomy. 69 videos each were directly addressed to patients and doctors. Medical content generally was of low quality, while technical quality and total quality were at a high level. Reliability was good.CONCLUSIONS: Videos on radical prostatectomy on YouTube allow for patient information. While technical quality and reliability are classified as acceptable, medical content was low and warranted preselection. In contrast to Loeb <i>et al.</i> we did not observe a negative correlation between number of views and scientific quality in different scores. Our findings support the need for preselection of videos on YouTube as the potential benefit may vary between videos with the significant risk of low medical quality.

urology & nephrology
YouTube as a resource for surgical education with a focus on plastic surgery – a systematic review

Inga S. Besmens,Semra Uyulmaz,Pietro Giovanoli,Nicole Lindenblatt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2021.1884084

2021-03-10

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

Abstract:Surgery trainees use videos as a means to learn about surgical procedures. YouTube is the biggest online video platform and used for educational content as well but the medical information provided does not undergo peer review or other forms of scientific screening and can thus be of poorer quality. We performed a systematic review that examined the quality of educational videos about surgery and plastic surgery in particular on YouTube. The focus was towards studies on the benefit of YouTube videos for surgical trainees. A literature review was performed to determine the educational quality of plastic surgery videos found on YouTube. Articles reviewing the educational quality of videos about surgical procedures, their accuracy, and their utility for surgical trainees were included. An additional review was performed evaluating the literature about the quality of educational plastic surgery videos. Eleven articles were selected reviewing the educational quality of videos about surgical procedures. Six studies were fully assessed and evaluated concerning the quality of educational plastic surgery videos. There currently seems to be a lack of comprehensive educational surgery and in particular plastic surgery-related information on YouTube. The popularity of YouTube among surgical trainees is high. The quality of available educational surgical video content varies widely. It is in the interest of plastic surgery teaching institutions to provide trainees with high-quality educational video material.

surgery,orthopedics
(145) Utilization of Crowdfunding for Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery

H Sun,E Pei,S Rhodes,K Mishra,S Gupta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.137

2024-02-01

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Though the incidence of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is increasing within the United States (US), many transgender and gender diverse individuals are denied insurance coverage for these procedures. Some turn to crowdfunding for financial assistance. Objective We aimed to determine characteristics of fundraisers for genital GAS within the US and factors associated with greater funding. Methods GoFundMe is the largest individual crowdfunding platform in the US and was queried in January 2023 using search terms related to genital GAS such as “bottom surgery”, “gender affirming surgery”, and “transgender surgery”. Duplicate, outside the US, non-English, and non-relevant campaigns were excluded. For each campaign, organizer’s state, fundraising goal, amount raised, number of donors, and campaign description were retrieved. Generalized additive models were created to determine the relationship of predictors with achieving full funding. An additional Bayesian estimation approach model was created to determine the relationship of predictors with overall campaign progress. Results From 4,921 viewable campaigns, 1,497 met inclusion criteria for analysis. All states were represented with the greatest number in California (n = 155, 10.4%). The median amount raised was $195 (IQR 0-2,270) of a goal of $12,000 (IQR 5,000-30,000); 87 (5.8%) campaigns were fully funded, while 555 (37.1%) had no funding. Three-quarters of campaigns were less than one-third funded. Of 1,315 campaigns where transition type was indicated, 76.6% (n = 1,007) were for FGS and 22.7% (n=298) were for MGS. Though the average marginal effect of increasing the goal was to decrease funding progress (FGS -0.329, 95% CI -0.445 to -0.0248, MGS -0.589, 95% CI -1.071 to -0.347), an increase in funding progress was seen with increasing the goal from $1,000 to $10,000 for FGS. The average marginal effect of increasing word count was +0.26 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.36) with the greatest effect between 100 to 500 words. The average marginal effect of increasing campaign age on progress was +0.35 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.47), with the greatest effect between 500 to 1000 days. Conclusions Crowdfunding is an attractive option for TGD individuals who need financial support for genital GAS and related expenses, but the majority of individual fundraisers on GoFundMe will only raise one-third or less of their goal. Specific windows of funding goal, word count, and campaign age are associated with greater odds of campaign progress. Such information can be used to counsel patients who are seeking financial assistance for genital GAS. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
Gender-Affirming Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Viraj Shah,Bashar Hassan,Rena Hassan,Malory Alexis,Myan Bhoopalam,Lorreen Agandi,Fan Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123580

2024-06-19

Abstract:Objectives: Fewer than one-fifth of all studies on gender-affirming care originate from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This is the first systematic review to examine surgical demographics and outcomes following gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in LMICs. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, five databases were systematically searched for original studies and case series on GAS within LMIC settings. Excluded reports included animal studies, non-English language studies, secondary studies including reviews, individual case reports and conference abstracts. Results: This review includes 34 studies involving n = 5064 TGNB individuals. Most studies (22, 64.7%) were from upper-middle-income countries, followed by lower-middle-income countries (12, 35.3%). A total of 31 studies (91.2%) reported on post-operative outcomes. Of n = 5013 patients who underwent GAS, 71.5% (n = 3584) underwent masculinizing and 29.5% (n = 1480) underwent feminizing procedures. The predominant procedures were metoidioplasty (n = 2270/3584, 63.3%) and vaginoplasty (n = 1103/1480, 74.5%). Mean follow-up was 47.7 months. In patients who underwent metoidioplasty, 6.8% (n = 155) of patients experienced a complication and 6.3% (n = 144) underwent revision surgery. In patients who underwent vaginoplasty, 11.5% (n = 127) of patients experienced a complication and 8.5% (n = 94) underwent revision surgery. Of the studies (25/34, 73.5%) that reported on quality of life and post-operative satisfaction, the majority showed marked improvements in psychosocial and functional outcomes. Notably, no post-surgical regret was reported among the surveyed patients. Conclusions: Existing literature on GAS in LMICs remains scarce and is concentrated in select institutions that drive specific procedures. Our review highlights the low reported volumes of GAS, variability in surgical outcomes and quality of life.
Reliability of YouTube content targeting Arabic-speaking patients with breast cancer regarding post-mastectomy reconstruction.

Haifa Alotaibi,Marya Alsuhaibani,Abeer Alsulaimani,Eric Belzile,Nina Morena,Ari N. Meguerditchian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e13626

IF: 45.3

2024-05-31

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e13626 Background: The dynamic and easily accessible nature of social media platforms, particularly YouTube (YT), has revolutionized the way breast cancer (BC) patients seek and process information. This study aims to evaluate the quality of YT videos addressing post-mastectomy reconstruction (PMR) that target Arabic-speaking women (ASW), a heavily digitally connected segment of society that may experience challenges in accessing mainstream medical information in Arabic Language (AL). Methods: YT was searched incognito, using the terms: "post mastectomy reconstruction" in (AL) in July 2023. Upload date, video length, number of views, poster identity and other relevant information were compiled. Video understandability and actionability were assessed by physician-reviewers (PR) with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audiovisual materials (PEMAT A/V), while the DISCERN tool appraised quality. Sponsorship presence, patient vs health care professional narratives, and intended audience were documented. Thematic analysis of most discussed topics was performed. Additionally, cluster analysis was employed to categorize the videos based on their quality. Results: Of 109 videos (mean length: 7 mins.), 67% had sponsorship (of which 45% corporate); 92% were information-based (vs experience-based); 82% targeted general population over BC patients; 93.6% were in AL, and 5.5% had translation. Mean PEMAT scores were 61.3% (understandability) and 20% (actionability). Mean DISCERN score was 2.6/5. Only 21% of videos featured women. Predominant themes were awareness (82.6%), appearance, and body image (68.8%). Less prevalent: sexuality and fertility (4.6%). The likelihood that the PR would recommend the video to a patient was low at 43.1%. Cluster analysis showed that high-quality videos had a higher understandability (74%), actionability (40.5%) and greater likelihood of being recommended by a PR (90.5%). Conclusions: YT content on PMR for ASW is easily understandable but lacks actionability and has moderate overall quality. Videos are highly sponsored and questionably representative of patients’ and women’s perspective. Therefore, Improving YT content, especially in AL, is crucial for supporting BC patients exploring PMR. The identified themes and insights into gender representation provide valuable guidance for content creators aiming to improve digital resources for this digitally connected demographic.

oncology

Serum albumin-adjusted glycated albumin as a better indicator of glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with short duration of hemodialysis.

Evaluating quality, understandability, and actionability of YouTube content for gender affirming surgery

Gynecomastia Surgery Patient Education

Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading

Mid-urethral slings on YouTube: quality information on the internet?

Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Penis Enlargement Surgery

[WHO activities in the epidemiology of dental caries (author's transl)].

Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube

Trauma in pregnancy: uterine rupture.

An Analysis of Male Plastic Surgery Content on TikTok

Consulting "Dr. YouTube": an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website

Assessment of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Content on YouTube

Hepatotoxicity to sodium valproate: a review.

Acute changes in osmolality and renin and respiratory control of arterial PCO2 and [H+].

Evaluation of Videos Related to Vaginal Cone Usage on YouTube as an Online Information Source

Social Media Videos on Contraceptive Implants: An Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability

Radical Prostatectomy on YouTube: Education or Disinformation?

YouTube as a resource for surgical education with a focus on plastic surgery – a systematic review

(145) Utilization of Crowdfunding for Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery

Gender-Affirming Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Reliability of YouTube content targeting Arabic-speaking patients with breast cancer regarding post-mastectomy reconstruction.