Abstract:Introduction Intensive chemotherapy (IC) remains the main backbone therapy in fit, newly diagnosed, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of IC under-represent select subgroups of patients, such as those with certain comorbidities, unique characteristics, or rare genomic abnormalities. Real-world data provides additional insights into treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML receiving first-line IC. REAL-IDH is an international network that generates evidence to improve real-world understanding of AML, including patients with a mutation in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (m IDH1). This abstract presents data from the REAL-IDH study, specifically on treatment patterns and outcomes in newly diagnosed AML patients who were treated with IC, including those with or without m IDH1 disease. Methods This retrospective, longitudinal, observational study was conducted using databases from the USA (Cancer Outcomes Tracking and Analysis [COTA]), UK (Cancer Analysis System [CAS]), and France (DATAML registry). Data were collected on adult patients with newly diagnosed AML between 2013-2020 (USA and UK) and 2017-2021 (France).Similar inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied across countries. Here we report treatment patterns, efficacy and safety outcomes, including complete (CR) and partial response (PR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), minimal residual disease (MRD), morphological leukemia-free state (MLFS), time to treatment response (TTR), objective response rate (ORR; defined as rate of CR, CRi, PR and MLFS in the total treated population), mortality rate, and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving first-line IC. Results 13,013 patients with AML were included in the REAL-IDH study, with 7406 eligible patients receiving IC as first-line treatment (USA: n=1145; France: n=800; UK: n=5461). In the IC population, of those tested for the IDH mutation, m IDH1 was detected in 70 (6.1%), 84 (10.5%), and 15 (9.3%) patients in the USA, France, and UK, respectively. The most frequent first-line IC, in all three databases, was cytarabine + anthracycline (7+3 regimen) in the total populations and in the m IDH1 and wild-type subgroups. In France, lomustine was added to 7+3 in patients >60 years. The most frequent second-line therapy in the whole IC population was salvage chemotherapy with high-dose or intermediate-dose cytarabine or a combination of either of these with anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin, or amsacrine) in France and decitabine or the combination of cytarabine, etoposide and mitoxantrone in the USA. Azacitidine/venetoclax combination was used in second and third line in France and USA and it was the most frequent third-line therapy (35.8%) in France. Patients received IC in combination with targeted therapies (mainly midostaurin) in 18% of the IC population in France and 12.4% of the IC population in the USA. Rates of CR, MLFS, TTR and ORR were similar in the USA and France ( Table 1). Mortality rates were similar across all three countries ( Table 1). Adverse events (AE) were reported in 43.7% of patients (500; N=1145) in the USA and 76.3% (610; N=800) in France with a reported infection in 13% (149; N=1145; CTCAE coded infection AE) and 43.1% (345; N=800; fungal/bacterial at induction or during treatment; septic shock/pneumopathy at induction or during first 3 months of treatment leading to admission to an intensive care unit; or infection leading to death) of patients in the USA and France, respectively. Conclusion This large-scale population-based study provides insight into treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML who received first-line IC in the real-world setting, including patients with or without m IDH1 disease. Intensive treatment combinations have not significantly changed over the past decade with the exception of the addition of targeted therapies. Despite the lack of a common standard IC regimen and protocol across countries, and different healthcare systems, mortality rates were similar with IC across each country. In the REAL-IDH study we observed that treatment patterns in m IDH1 or wild type patients were similar. More specific data is needed regarding the sequencing of treatment regimens and overall outcomes in m IDH1 AML patients.

Efficacy and tolerability of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review of clinical trials

Epigenetic Priming with Decitabine Followed by Low-Dose Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine in AML Evolving from MDS or Higher Risk MDS: A Multicentre Phase 2 Single-Arm Trial

Ivosidenib in Chinese Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Registry Study

[Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Different Dose Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine Regimen As Induction Chemotherapy for Young Patients with De-Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia].

Clinical Implications of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations and Targeted Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors—Recent Advances, Challenges and Future Prospects

Decitabine combined with low dose idarubicin and cytarabine (D-IA) followed by allo-HSCT improves acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patient outcomes: results from a retrospective study

Prognostic Value of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: a Retrospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.

A review of the isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors in management of adult patients with AML and MDS

Epigenetic Priming with Decitabine Followed by Low Dose Idarubicin and Cytarabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Higher‐risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: a Prospective Multicenter Single‐arm Trial

IDH Inhibitors in AML—Promise and Pitfalls

Combinatory Therapy Targeting Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Improves Efficacy of IDH Mutant Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

IDH2 Inhibitor Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single Institution Experience

Poster: AML-295 AGILE: A Global, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of Ivosidenib + Azacitidine Versus Placebo + Azacitidine in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia with an IDH1 Mutation

A Review of Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Measurable residual mutated IDH2 before allogeneic transplant for acute myeloid leukemia

Ivosidenib and Azacitidine Inidh1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML: a phase 1 study

P430: MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF CLINICAL RESPONSE IN NEWLY-DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA PATIENTS TREATED WITH IVOSIDENIB + AZACITIDINE COMPARED TO PLACEBO + AZACITIDINE

Molecular Features Associated with Response to Enasidenib Plus Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed IDH2-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia with and without mIDH1 Treated with Intensive Chemotherapy from an International Real-World Database (REAL-IDH)

Systematic Review of Epigenetic Therapies for Treatment of IDH-mutant Glioma