Abstract:<p>Collective cooperation is essential to human society, and it exists in many social dilemmas. In the scenario of a collective-risk social dilemma, a group of players have to collectively contribute to a public fund to prevent the tragedy of the commons, such as dangerous climate change, because everybody will lose all their remaining money when the damage happens with a certain probability if the group fails to reach a fixed fundraising target. Yet, it remains largely unclear how the group size affects the probability of reaching the collective target and the mechanism that drives different outcomes of the collective cooperation. Here, we contribute to the literature by exploring the role of group size in the collective-risk social dilemma and the potential underlying mechanism using both model simulations and human experiments. Through simulations we found that the rate of failure for collective cooperation increases for larger groups, along with the arising of bystander effect and a decrease in average contributions, which are confirmed by our experimental observations. We further analyze the patterns of investment behaviors in the experiment setting by categorizing players into cooperators, altruists, and free riders using both a clustering method and a golden standard. We found that altruists who tend to contribute more, rather than cooperators who prefer contributing a fair-share investment, play a crucial role in groups with success outcome in early and/or middle stages of the game. Our results indicate that bystanders are dynamic and their amount depends on the contribution of others. When others contribute less, bystanders also contribute less. If the collective goal is unlikely to achieve, more players choose to be bystanders who strategically contribute less, intriguing the failure of the collective goal. Our findings suggest a potentially effective way to solve the collective-risk social dilemma by reducing the bystander effect through the mechanism design of forming small groups.</p>

Characterization of heparin binding of human extracellular superoxide dismutase.

Assessing the impact of costly punishment and group size in collective-risk climate dilemmas

Calculated Punishment

Increasing returns to scale: The solution to the second-order social dilemma

Escaping the Tragedy of the Commons through Targeted Punishment

Punishing Just in Time: Public Cooperation and Economies of Scale

The effect of distribution of fines on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

Differentiated Responsibilities and Prosocial Behavior in Climate Change Mitigation: Behavioral Evidence from the United States and China

Probabilistic sharing solves the problem of costly punishment

The Coordination of Collective and Individual Solutions in Risk-Resistant Scenarios

Rare but Severe Concerted Punishment That Favors Cooperation.

The regulation of good and evi promotes cooperation in public goods game

[Computerized protocol for functional exploration of the stomatognathic system].

Emergence of Punishment in Social Dilemma with Environmental Feedback

Conditional punishment is a double-edged sword in promoting cooperation.

The relationship of the source of punishment and personality traits with investment and punishment in a public goods game

The cost of noise: stochastic punishment falls short of sustaining cooperation in social dilemma experiments

Reducing the bystander effect via decreasing group size to solve the collective-risk social dilemma

Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game

Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game