Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare visual function in pseudophakic patients with bilateral implantation of Tecnis multifocal aspheric and conventional monofocal spherical intraocular lenses (IOL).METHODS:A prospective study of 100 consecutive cases (200 eyes) was conducted. All cataract patients underwent phacoemulsification were randomized to receive multifocal aspheric IOL (Tecnis ZM900, AMO, multifocal aspheric group) or conventional spherical IOL (Akreos Adapt, Bausch & Lomb, monofocal spherical group). The following investigations were performed to assess the uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuity of distance, intermediate and near distances, accommodative amplitude, spherical aberrations of total eye, contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and near stereoacuity. Patients were surveyed for visual disturbances and lifestyle visual quality. The independent-samples t test was used to compare the measure data which met normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the measure data which didn't meet. The chi-square test was applied to compare categorical variables.RESULTS:The uncorrected and distance-corrected bilateral visual acuity of multifocal aspheric group at 30 cm and 40 cm were 0.24 ± 0.12 and 0.22 ± 0.11 (logMAR), better than monofocal spherical group (Z = -8.261, P = 0.000; Z = -5.508, P = 0.000), but the visual acuity at other distances had no statistical difference between two groups. Patients with multifocal aspheric IOL had significantly higher accommodative amplitude than those with monofocal spherical IOL, improved about 2.3 ∼ 2.8 D (Z = -10.655, P = 0.000; Z = -2.709, P = 0.007). Mean spherical aberration of multifocal aspheric group was (0.027 ± 0.160) µm and (0.006 ± 0.083) µm, significantly lower than that of monofocal spherical group (0.269 ± 0.161) µm, (0.037 ± 0.205) µm at 5 mm and 3 mm pupil diameter (Z = -8.815, P = 0.000; Z = -2.791, P = 0.005). The difference of contrast sensitivity was not significant, but glare sensitivity was higher for monofocal spherical group than for multifocal aspheric group. Multifocal aspheric group showed statistically better uncorrected stereoacuity (72.4 ± 29.9)″ than monofocal spherical group (92.8 ± 35.7)″ (Z = -3.089, P = 0.002).CONCLUSIONS:The present clinical results demonstrated that Tecnis multifocal aspheric group had better near visual acuity, accommodative amplitude and near stereoacuity as compared to conventional monofocal spherical group. The aspheric design reduced spherical aberration of total eye and improved contrast sensitivity in some way.

Clinical performance of a hybrid presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in patients undergoing cataract surgery in a multicenter trial

Visual outcomes and safety of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: results of a pivotal clinical trial

Clinical evaluation of a multifocal aspheric diffractive intraocular lens

Long-term clinical and patient reported outcomes of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens

Clinical performance after implantation of the Symfony extended depth of focus intraocular lens in the dominant eye and the Synergy presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in the non-dominant eye

Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison

Evolution of visual performance in 250 eyes implanted with the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal IOL

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Echelette Extended Range of Vision and Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lenses

[Binocular Clinical Comparison Study of Tecnis Multifocal Aspheric and Monofocal Spherical Intraocular Lenses].

Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Binocular Visual Outcomes Comparison of Two Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in High-Myopic Cataract Patients: A 1-Year Multicenter Study

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients implanted with Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 and 1-Piece ZCB00 monofocal intraocular lenses

Prospective Evaluation of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Contralateral Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) and Hybrid EDOF-Multifocal IOL

CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF A TORIC CONTINUOUS RANGE OF VISION PRESBYOPIA-CORRECTING INTRAOCULAR LENS

Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Worldwide Pooled Analysis of Prospective Clinical Investigations

Visual Performance with Accommodating and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Comparison of cataract patients with regular corneal astigmatism after implantation of extended range-of-vision and bifocal toric intraocular lenses

Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study

Real-world outcomes of cataract surgeries using a new type of enhanced monofocal toric intraocular lens