A group study of diabetes and the eye.

I. Givner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(52)92163-6

1952-10-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

From Operating Room to Courtroom: Analyzing Malpractice Trajectories in Cranial Neurosurgery

Jakob V E Gerstl,Saksham Gupta,Carl E Stenberg,Jeremy Chabros,Leo F Nonnenbroich,Rebecca Lindberg,Marcelle S Altshuler,David Seaver,Michael A Mooney,Kai U Frerichs,Timothy R Smith,Omar Arnaout

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003052

IF: 5.315

2024-06-25

Neurosurgery

Abstract:Background and objectives: Nearly all neurosurgeons in the United States will be named defendants in a malpractice claim before retirement. We perform an assessment of national malpractice trends in cranial neurosurgery to inform neurosurgeons on current outcomes, trends over time, benchmarks for malpractice coverage needs, and ways to mitigate lawsuits. Methods: The Westlaw Edge and LexisNexis databases were searched to identify medical malpractice cases relating to open cranial surgery between 1987 and 2023. Extracted data included date of verdict, jurisdiction, outcome, details of sustained injuries, and any associated award/settlement figures. Results: Of 1550 cases analyzed, 252 were identified as malpractice claims arising from open cranial surgery. The median settlement amount was $950 000 and the average plaintiff ruling was $2 750 000. The highest plaintiff ruling resulted in an award of $28.1 million. Linear regression revealed no significant relationship between year and defendant win (P-value = .43). After adjusting for inflation, award value increased with time (P-value = .01). The most common cranial subspecialties were tumor (67 cases, 26.6%), vascular (54 cases, 21.4%), infection (23 cases, 9.1%), and trauma (23 cases, 9.1%). Perioperative complications was the most common litigation category (96 cases, 38.1%), followed by delayed treatment (40 cases, 15.9%), failure to diagnose (38 cases, 15.1%), and incorrect choice of procedure (29 cases, 11.5%). The states with most claims were New York (40 cases, 15.9%), California (24 cases, 9.5%), Florida (21 cases, 8.3%), and Pennsylvania (20 cases, 7.9%). Conclusion: Although a stable number of cases were won by neurosurgeons, an increase in award sizes was observed in the 37-year period assessed. Perioperative complications and delayed treatment/diagnosis were key drivers of malpractice claims.
Medical malpractice: managing the risk

R B Vukmir

Abstract:Study objective: This is an attempt to present an analysis of the literature examining objective information concerning the likelihood of medicolegal errors as it applies to current medical practice. Hopefully this information will be synthesized to generate a cogent approach to manage risk in emergency medicine. Methods: Articles were obtained by an English language search of MEDLINE from January 1976 to July 2003. This computerized search was supplemented with literature from the author's personal medicolegal collection of peer review articles. This information was presented in a qualitative fashion. Results: There was a steady increase in both the incidence and the recovery amount of verdicts involving general malpractice litigation. There are clearly high-risk emergency medicine categories responsible for most malpractice events, involving such commonly encountered conditions such as chest pain, abdominal pain, pediatric fever, central nervous system (CNS) bleeding, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Interestingly, there is a second peak of more minor emergencies, specifically wounds with neglected foreign bodies and missed fractures. Clearly, the largest dollar amount recovery still involves chest pain with subsequent missed transmural myocardial infarction (MI). Interestingly, there does not appear to be a strong correlation between adverse events, outcome and medicolegal risk. Likewise, there does not appear to be a strong correlation between socioeconomic status and a propensity to sue, but there were some defined links with physician profiles involving past malpractice history, as well as prior adverse relationships or communication skills to subsequent claims. Interestingly, a significant association appears to be advertising placed by local law offices seeking to provide services. Lastly in the emergency medical services (EMS) realm, the single strongest correlate to malpractice was the likelihood of an ambulance accident and not related to care delivered itself. Conclusion: The current emergency medicine medicolegal dilemmas are a complex interaction of both patient and physician factors specifically targeting several disease categories and damage claims. Awareness of these issues can help to minimize subsequent medicolegal risk and improve patient care.
Malpractice Cases in Breast Surgery: An Assessment of Litigation Involving Surgeons

Betty Fan,Jaime Pardo,C Winnie Yu-Moe,Margaret Janes,Bianca Falcone,Monica G Valero,Stephanie K Serres,Isha Emhoff,Ted A James

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10236-2

Abstract:Introduction: Improving patient safety and quality are priorities in health care. The study of malpractice cases provides an opportunity to identify areas for quality improvement. While the issues surrounding malpractice cases in breast cancer are often multifactorial, there are few studies providing insight into malpractice cases specifically related to common breast cancer surgical procedures. We sought to characterize the factors in liability cases involving breast cancer surgery. Methods: Closed cases from 2008 to 2019 involving a breast cancer diagnosis, a primary responsible service of general surgery, surgical oncology, or plastic surgery, and a breast cancer procedure were reviewed using data from the Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO) Strategies Comparative Benchmarking System database, a national repository of professional liability data. Results: A total of 174 malpractice cases were reviewed, of which 41 cases were closed with payment. Plastic surgeons were most commonly named (64%, 111/174), followed by general surgeons (30%, 53/174), and surgical oncologists (6%, 10/174). The most common allegation was error in surgical treatment (87%, 152/174), and infection, cosmetic injury, emotional trauma, foreign body, and nosocomial infections represented the top five injury descriptions. On average, indemnity payments were larger for high clinical severity cases. Technical skills, followed by clinical judgment, were the most commonly named contributing factors. The average payment per case was $130,422. Conclusion: Malpractice cases predominantly involve technical complications related to plastic surgery procedures. Better understanding of the malpractice environment involving surgical procedures performed for breast cancer may provide practical insight to guide initiatives aimed at improving patient outcomes.
Medical Malpractice in Otolaryngology within the United States: A LexisNexis-Based Demographic Analysis

Shiven Sharma,Shaun Edalati,Tony Chung,Nathan Wallace,Jean A Eloy,Li-Xing Man,Eric M Genden,Satish Govindaraj

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.943

2024-09-15

Abstract:Objective: Otolaryngologists are at a significantly greater risk of being sued than most other physicians. To date, there is a lack of studies characterizing trends in otolaryngology malpractice claims. To assess these trends and risk variables, this study examined malpractice claims against otolaryngologists. Study design: Retrospective database review. Setting: LexisNexis Jury Verdicts and Settlements. Methods: The LexisNexis legal database was used to locate jury verdicts and settlements related to medical malpractice in otolaryngology, from 2018 to 2024. The study did not include any claims covered by the Social Security Disability Insurance, Workers' Compensation, Healthcare Law, or Criminal Law and Procedure categories. Temporal trends were evaluated, and logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors. Results: Out of 903 items, 79 reported malpractice cases were included (mean age 44.5; 60.3% female). The most sued subspecialty was head and neck oncology (32.5%). Negligence (93.7%) was the primary cause of action. Of cases sent to the jury, 87.7% of them resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant. The mean plaintiff verdict payout was $7,432,508.06 and the mean identified settlement amount was $1,562,500.00. Physical injury (62.0%) was the highest type of harm. Regional analysis indicated a higher percentage of cases from New York favored the defendant (21.1% vs 13.6%; P = .034). Conclusion: This study highlights key trends in otolaryngology malpractice claims, emphasizing the prevalence in cases of head and neck surgery, primarily attributed to negligence. By identifying trends and risk factors, otolaryngologists can get a better understanding of the dynamics surrounding malpractice.
Qlti-15. Medical Malpractice And Glioma

Rose Fluss,Celina Crisman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1029

2024-11-29

Neuro-Oncology

Abstract:BACKGROUNDMedical malpractice affects the practice of medicine in every field and specialty. It is a particular concern in high risk specialties including neurological surgery, which has the greatest risk of malpractice litigation. Treatment of glioma patients is complex and requires diagnosis based on presentation and imaging, followed by the decision of resection versus biopsy to confirm diagnosis and potentially improve prognosis. The possibility of a complication accompanies every procedure and patients generally also go on to receive chemotherapy and radiation. Interdisciplinary care is a hallmark. We explored medical malpractice litigation pertaining to gliomas with a focus on outcomes and the role of the defendants as well as the liabilities prompting litigation. METHODSWestLaw Precision, an established legal database, was queried for all cases relevant to "glioma" occurring since 2000. Cases and settlements, in particular, were considered. Keywords included "glioma" and "medical malpractice" with the date range including all cases after January 1, 2000. Cases were identified and analyzed for variables of interest. RESULTSFourteen relevant cases were identified and reviewed. There were three plaintiff verdicts, one settlement and ten defense verdicts in favor of the defense. Two cases involved minors, while all others concerned adults. Both cases pertaining to the care of minors with gliomas resulted in findings for the defense. The majority of cases centered on failure to diagnose occurring before surgery or treatment. Defendants included neurosurgeons, pathologists, radiologists, nurses and hospital systems. Although the number of cases considered here is small, jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs resulted in far higher payouts compared with settlements. CONCLUSIONSMedical malpractice allegations relating to glioma treatment are shown to be rare and infrequent. The majority of cases alleged a failure to appropriately diagnose, before surgery or treatment took place. The great majority of cases reported within WestLaw Precision resulted in jury verdicts for the defense.

oncology,clinical neurology
Medical Malpractice in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review of US Case Law

Scott A Galey,Adam Margalit,Michael C Ain,Jaysson T Brooks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001348

Abstract:Background: Compared with other orthopaedic subspecialties, pediatric orthopaedic surgeons are thought to be at greater risk for malpractice claims; however, there is scant research on this topic. The purpose of our study was to characterize publicly available malpractice cases pertaining to pediatric orthopaedics to determine the (1) most common specialties of the physicians implicated, (2) most common diagnoses involved, (3) rate of verdicts in favor of the plaintiff, (4) amount of indemnity payments resulting from all verdicts versus verdicts in which only an orthopaedic surgeon was involved, and (5) outcomes of cases that were appealed. Methods: The Westlaw legal database was queried for jury verdicts, settlements, and appellate cases using the search terms "pediatric" AND "orthopaedic" from December 31, 1984, to January 1, 2016, yielding 176 appellate court cases and 189 jury reports/settlements. After excluding duplicate cases and those involving patients aged 21 years or older, 36 appellate and 84 jury reports/settlement cases remained for analysis. Results: Lawsuits against orthopaedic surgeons and pediatricians were most common, in cases involving fracture diagnosis and misdiagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip, respectively. Of the 84 cases, 43 rulings favored the plaintiffs. The median (interquartile range) indemnity payment was $900,000 ($1.9 million), and for cases in which only the orthopaedic surgeon was named as the defendant, the median (interquartile range) indemnity payment was $675,000 ($827,000). Of the 34 appellate cases, 16 cases initially ruled in favor of the defendant were upheld and 13 were reversed/remanded. Five cases initially ruled in favor of the plaintiff were upheld, and none was reversed/remanded. Conclusions: Malpractice lawsuits named orthopaedic surgeons and pediatricians more often than physicians in other specialties. Orthopaedic surgeons were sued most often for management of fractures and pediatricians for mismanagement of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Nearly 51% of malpractice cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiff, with high indemnity payments. However, when cases that were ruled in favor of the physician were appealed, most verdicts were upheld. Level of evidence: Level IV.
Allegations of Failure to Obtain Informed Consent in Spinal Surgery Medical Malpractice Claims

Jennifer Grauberger,Panagiotis Kerezoudis,Asad J. Choudhry,Mohammed Ali Alvi,Ahmad Nassr,Bradford Currier,Mohamad Bydon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0544

2017-06-21

JAMA Surgery

Abstract:Importance: Predictive factors associated with increased risk of medical malpractice litigation have been identified, including severity of injury, physician sex, and error in diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating informed consent in spinal surgery malpractice.Objective: To investigate the failure to obtain informed consent as an allegation in medical malpractice claims for patients undergoing a spinal procedure.Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, a national medicolegal database was searched for malpractice claim cases related to spinal surgery for all years available (ie, January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2015).Main Outcomes and Measures: Failure to obtain informed consent and associated medical malpractice case verdict.Results: A total of 233 patients (117 [50.4%] male and 116 [49.8%] female; 80 with no informed consent allegation and 153 who cited lack of informed consent) who underwent spinal surgery and filed a malpractice claim were studied (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [13.1] years in the total group, 45.8 [12.9] years in the control group, and 47.9 [13.3] years in the informed consent group). Median interval between year of surgery and year of verdict was 5.4 years (interquartile range, 4-7 years). The most common informed consent allegations were failure to explain risks and adverse effects of surgery (52 [30.4%]) and failure to explain alternative treatment options (17 [9.9%]). In bivariate analysis, patients in the control group were more likely to require additional surgery (45 [56.3%] vs 53 [34.6%], P = .002) and have more permanent injuries compared with the informed consent group (46 [57.5%] vs 63 [42.0%], P = .03). On multivariable regression analysis, permanent injuries were more often associated with indemnity payment after a plaintiff verdict (odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% CI, 1.46-6.65; P = .003) or a settlement (OR, 6.26; 95% CI, 1.06-36.70; P = .04). Informed consent allegations were significantly associated with less severe (temporary or emotional) injury (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97; P = .04). In addition, allegations of informed consent were found to be predictive of a defense verdict vs a plaintiff ruling (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = .046) or settlement (OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.15; P < .001).Conclusions and Relevance: Lack of informed consent is an important cause of medical malpractice litigation. Although associated with a lower rate of indemnity payments, malpractice lawsuits, including informed consent allegations, still present a time, money, and reputation toll for physicians. The findings of this study can therefore help to improve preoperative discussions to protect spinal surgeons from malpractice claims and ensure that patients are better informed.

medicine, general & internal
Retrospective Analysis of US Litigations Involving Dermatologists From 2011 to 2022

Young H. Lim,Shahin A. Saberi,Kanika Kamal,H. Ray Jalian,Mathew Avram

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000004142

2024-02-28

Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract:BACKGROUND Physician malpractice lawsuits are climbing, and the reasons underlying litigation against dermatologists are unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine the reasons patients pursue litigation against dermatologists or dermatology practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of all state and federal cases between 2011 and 2022 was performed after a query using “Dermatology” and “dermatologist” as search terms on 2 national legal data repositories. RESULTS The authors identified a total of 48 (37 state and 11 federal) lawsuits in which a practicing dermatologist or dermatology group practice was the defendant. The most common reason for litigation was unexpected harm (26 cases, 54.2%), followed by diagnostic error (e.g. incorrect or delayed diagnoses) (16 cases, 33.3%). Six cases resulted from the dermatologist failing to communicate important information, such as medication side effects or obtaining informed consent. Male dermatologists were sued at a rate 3.1 times higher than female dermatologists. CONCLUSION Although lawsuits from patients against dermatologists largely involve injury from elective procedures, clinicians should practice caution regarding missed diagnoses and ensure critical information is shared with patients to safeguard against easily avoidable litigation.

dermatology,surgery
Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: An Analysis of Claims in the Netherlands

Wouter J Dronkers,Dennis R Buis,Quirine J M A Amelink,Gert-Joan Bouma,Wilco C Peul,W Peter Vandertop,Marike L D Broekman,Aart C Hendriks,Clemens M F Dirven,Jochem K H Spoor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003117

IF: 5.315

2024-07-26

Neurosurgery

Abstract:Background and objectives: Studying malpractice claims is important to improve quality of health care and patient safety and to educate the individual healthcare providers. The objective of this study was to describe characteristics of neurosurgical claims in the Netherlands. Methods: A nationwide retrospective observational study of neurosurgery-related claims closed by Centramed and MediRisk, 2 major insurance companies in the Netherlands, was performed. Relevant data, including type of neurosurgical pathology, theme and category of the claim, type and severity of injury, outcome, and financial burden, were extracted from anonymized claim files. The estimated annual risk was used to determine the risk for claims by adjusting for the number of annually practicing neurosurgeons in the Netherlands. Results: A total of 388 claims against neurosurgeons were closed between 2007 and 2021. Liability was denied in a slight majority of claims (n = 230; 59%). The total burden during this period was €6 165 000 (amount paid out to patients: €5 497 000). The estimated annual risk per Dutch neurosurgeon for a claim was 15.5%, meaning 1 claim per 6.5 years. The case-level analysis of 238 available anonymized claims revealed that most claims were related to spinal pathology (81.5%), followed by cranial pathology (10.9%) and peripheral nerve (7.6%). The motivations for filing claims were mostly related to alleged surgical (56.3%) or diagnostic errors (22.3%). Most of these claims were denied (151/238; 63.4%), and fewer were settled (42/238; 17.6%), sustained (31/238; 13.0%), or closed without final decision (14/238; 5.9%). Conclusion: Neurosurgery-related malpractice claims primarily involved spinal pathology and were mostly related to alleged treatment errors. Most claims did not result in compensation because there seemed to be no liability or culpable injury. However, the annual risk for a claim for Dutch neurosurgeons is considerable.
Cost effectiveness of teicoplanin and ceftriaxone: a once-daily antibiotic regimen.

G. Schaison

Abstract:There is a high incidence of staphylococcal infection in febrile neutropenic children with a central venous line. These patients are usually initially treated with empiric antimicrobial therapy that provides broad spectrum coverage. In a study evaluating a conventional regimen of vancomycin 40 mg/kg/d plus ceftazidime 100 mg/kg/d given in three divided doses to 41 febrile children with leukemia or lymphoma, the response rate was 87% after a mean treatment duration of 16 days. A once-daily regimen of an investigational antibiotic, teicoplanin, 10 mg/kg/d and ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg/d evaluated in 47 febrile children with leukemia was found to produce an equivalent rate of success and require the same mean duration of therapy. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the economic impact of replacing the conventional regimen with once-daily teicoplanin-ceftriaxone revealed that a 16-day course of the latter treatment would produce cost savings in terms of the cost of the antibiotics and other nonreusable materials, as well as in nursing time. Using French drug pricing data, the savings calculated for drugs and materials were 478 FF ($80 US). The teicoplanin-ceftriaxone regimen saved approximately 14 hours in nursing time per patient. Extrapolations based on estimates of hospital occupancy and the ratio of days a patient receives antibiotic therapy to the total duration of hospital stay suggest that an average hospital ward could achieve monthly costsavings of 7,641 FF ($1,273 US) for antibiotics and materials.
Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Spine Surgery in Beijing: The Past 6 Years.

Dong Hu,Suxi Gu,Huawei Liu,Huadong Yang,Fei Song,Songhua Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-118136/v1

2020-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background: Spine surgeons in particular face the most hostile liability environment among the surgical specialties. Systemic studies related to spine surgery litigation in China is absent. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of medical malpractice litigation involving spine surgery in Beijing for the past 6 years.Methods: Two online legal databases, Wusong and Weike, were queried for court verdicts involving spine surgery from Jan 2013 to Dec 2018 in Beijing. For all included cases, data pertaining to defendants, plaintiffs, case outcomes, allegations, and verdicts were abstracted, and descriptive analyses were performed. Results: A total of 186 legal cases were examined, 122 cases were excluded due to irrelevance or insufficient information. Of the 64 cases included in this investigation, 40.6% of them were male. The mean age of the plaintiffs was 53.2 ± 18.6 years. The most common complaint addressed in this study is dissatisfaction with consent (53.1%, n=34), followed by additional surgery required (40.2%, n=26), unsatisfactory outcome to surgery (17.6%, n=11), postoperative paralysis (15.6%, n=10) and postoperative infection (15.6%, n=10). The most common primary disease among all the cases is lumbar spinal stenosis (28.1%, n=18), followed by spinal tumor (18.8%, n=12), cervical spondylosis (17.2%, n=11), vertebral fracture (14.1%, n=9), deformity (12.5%, n=8) and others (9.3%, n=6). Spine surgeons successfully defended themselves in 13 cases (20.3%), which resulted in no indemnity payment. The rest 51 cases (79.7%) were closed with an average verdict payout of 155,562 Yuan, which was significant lower than the average compensation claimed by the plaintiff (783,172 Yuan) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Identifying the most common reasons for litigation and summarizing their characteristics may help decrease litigation rate and improve the patient experience. Further investigations with larger sample size and more complete database are needed.
Nature of Medical Malpractice Claims Against Radiation Oncologists

Deborah Marshall,Kathryn Tringale,Michael Connor,Rinaa Punglia,Abram Recht,Jona Hattangadi-Gluth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.022

2017-05-01

Abstract:Purpose: To examine characteristics of medical malpractice claims involving radiation oncologists closed during a 10-year period. Methods and materials: Malpractice claims filed against radiation oncologists from 2003 to 2012 collected by a nationwide liability insurance trade association were analyzed. Outcomes included the nature of claims and indemnity payments, including associated presenting diagnoses, procedures, alleged medical errors, and injury severity. We compared the likelihood of a claim resulting in payment in relation to injury severity categories (death as referent) using binomial logistic regression. Results: There were 362 closed claims involving radiation oncology, 102 (28%) of which were paid, resulting in $38 million in indemnity payments. The most common alleged errors included "improper performance" (38% of closed claims, 18% were paid; 29% [$11 million] of total indemnity), "errors in diagnosis" (25% of closed claims, 46% were paid; 44% [$17 million] of total indemnity), and "no medical misadventure" (14% of closed claims, 8% were paid; less than 1% [$148,000] of total indemnity). Another physician was named in 32% of claims, and consent issues/breach of contract were cited in 18%. Claims for injury resulting in death represented 39% of closed claims and 25% of total indemnity. "Improper performance" was the primary alleged error associated with injury resulting in death. Compared with claims involving death, major temporary injury (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-5.85, P=.009), significant permanent injury (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.48-6.46, P=.003), and major permanent injury (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.89-16.15, P=.002) had a higher likelihood of a claim resulting in indemnity payment. Conclusions: Improper performance was the most common alleged malpractice error. Claims involving significant or major injury were more likely to be paid than those involving death. Insights into the nature of liability claims against radiation oncologists may help direct efforts to improve quality of care and minimize the risk of being sued.
A look inside the courtroom: an analysis of 292 cosmetic breast surgery medical malpractice cases

Angie M Paik,Leila J Mady,Aditya Sood,Jean Anderson Eloy,Edward S Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13515702

2014-01-01

Abstract:Background: Malpractice claims affect the cost and quality of health care. Objective: The authors examine litigation in cosmetic breast surgery and identify factors influencing malpractice litigation outcomes. Methods: The Westlaw database was searched for jury verdict and settlement reports related to medical malpractice and cosmetic breast surgeries. Cases included for analysis were examined for year, geographic location, patient demographics, procedure performed, alleged injury, causes of action, verdict, and indemnity payments. Results: Of 292 cases, the most common injury sustained was disfigurement (53.1%). Negligent misrepresentation had a 98% greater chance of resolution in favor of the plaintiff (relative risk [RR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-2.79), and fraud had a 92% greater chance of disposition in favor of the plaintiff (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.32-2.80). The most common causes of action cited were negligence (88.7%) and lack of informed consent (43.8%). One hundred sixty-nine (58.3%) cases resulted in favor of the defendant and 121 (41.7%) cases were disposed in favor of the plaintiff; 97 (33.4%) cases resulted in damages awarded and 24 (8.3%) cases resulted in settlement. No significant difference was found between the medians of indemnity payments awarded to plaintiffs ($245 000) and settlements ($300 000). Conclusions: Based on this study, negligent or intentional misrepresentation strongly favors plaintiffs in either awarded damages or settlements in cases of cosmetic breast surgery litigation. This study emphasizes that transparency and adequate communication are at the crux of the physician-patient relationship and are tools by which plastic surgeons may reduce the frequency of litigations, thereby containing health care costs at a minimum.
(339) Malpractice Litigation Related to Management of Varicocele: A Legal Database Review

E Zhou,N Sellke,H Sun,K Tay,S Mortach,R Abou Ghayda,A Loeb,N Thirumavalavan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.324

2024-02-07

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Varicocele may be associated with pain and subfertility which comes with a range of treatment options, from observation to pain management to surgical correction. Urologists are defendants in more malpractice suits than the average physician and litigation may be a concern when determining their management strategy. Objective The purpose of the study was to investigate the factors associated with malpractice litigation surrounding the management of varicoceles. Methods Using the Casetext online legal database, we searched for cases with the query "(Malpractice and (Varicocele or Varicocelectomy))." Cases were only included if they were related to varicocele management. We documented the following variables: date of case, whether the plaintiff was incarcerated, alleged breaches of duty, alleged damages, and legal outcome. Data were analyzed using descriptive characteristics. Results Our database search yielded a total of 26 cases. Of these, 10 were related to the management of varicocele and included in our analysis. The cases occurred between the years 1931 and 2022, with 60% (6/10) having happened since 2013. 60% (6/10) of the cases involved an inmate as the plaintiff. The alleged breaches of duty included violation of the 8th Amendment (50%, 5/10), with all those cases involving inmates; negligence (40%, 4/10); and disability discrimination (10%, 1/10). The most common alleged damages included pain (80%, 8/10), infertility (30%, 3/10), and loss of testicle (30%, 3/10). A urologist was included among the defendants in half the cases. Other defendants included prison wardens, healthcare institutions, prison complexes, and other physicians. The verdict in 90% (9/10) of these cases favored the defendant. The lone case which favored the plaintiff occurred in 1951, included a urologist in the defense, and involved a retained drain inside the scrotum which led to infection and ultimately orchiectomy. 100% (6/6) of the cases involving inmates favored the defendant. Conclusions There have been relatively few legal cases on varicoceles, and most of them involved inmates. This may reflect differences in approach or treatment of urologic issues in inmates amongst medical care facilities. Violation of the 8th Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, was a common breach of duty alleged by incarcerated plaintiffs. However, all those cases favored the defense, with the explanation of these decisions often stating that the act of treating the varicocele, even if not successful, was proof that sufficient efforts were made. Most of the alleged damages involved pain because of insufficient or negligent treatment. Infertility as well as loss of testicle were less common claims. A major limitation of this study is that it does not capture cases which settled prior to trial. Nonetheless, providers should be reassured that malpractice claims regarding varicoceles are uncommon and that most cases are ruled in favor of the defense. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
Medical Malpractice and Rhinology

Douglas E. Dawson,Eric M. Kraus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3076

2007-09-01

American Journal of Rhinology

Abstract:Background Physicians facing malpractice litigation are in uncharted territory. The language, concepts, rules, and strategies of the legal system are foreign to science-based physicians. Understanding the statistics of rhinology malpractice litigation may aid the physician to cope with the assault of a claim. Methods Information from the 2006 Physician Insurers Association of America (PIAA) and the 2006 PIAA Risk Management Report (RMR)–Otorhinolaryngology were searched for claims data referable to the nose, nasal chamber, and paranasal sinuses. The PIAA data sharing report (DSR) is the largest single resource of malpractice claims data containing both settlement and trial judgment information. Results The nose, nasal cavity, and paranasal sinuses represent nearly two-thirds of the total indemnity paid for improper performance from otolaryngology head and neck surgery (Oto-HNS) medical malpractice claims between 1985 and 2005 based on claims information. Improper performance accounts for 50.3% of total monies paid ($107.6 million of $213.6 million) to resolve Oto-HNS claims in this period. Of nearly 2400 operative claims closed in the period of 1985–2005, 34.1% involved procedures on the nose and sinuses. In the past 6 years, $103.5 million indemnity has been added to the otolaryngology total. Conclusion The area of endoscopic sinus surgery has substantially contributed to Oto-HNS claims in the PIAA DSR. Despite malpractice being a cost of medical practice, every claim is perceived as an assault on the surgeon's competence. Ensuring informed consent and complete documentation may assist the provider in defending their care.
Design optimization of a dedicated breast PET scanner using TOF imaging in a partial ring geometry

Eunsin Lee,M. Werner,J. Karp,S. Surti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6153822

2011-10-01

Abstract:A dedicated breast PET scanner with a partial ring design can provide geometric flexibility in detector placement as well as the ability to combine with other modalities. A major challenge of a stationary partial ring scanner design with limited angle coverage is to maintain image quality and quantitative information in the tomographic image by incorporating TOF information in image reconstruction. Our aim is to optimize the scanner design for high spatial resolution and sensitivity followed by an evaluation of the timing resolution necessary to achieve high contrast in small lesions as a function of ring coverage. System design simulations were performed using a GATE Monte Carlo method for modeling TOF scanners with as good as 300 ps timing resolution. Point sources in air as well as in a water cylinder were simulated to benchmark the degradation in spatial resolution due to parallax error. For a realistic imaging situation we also simulated a lesion phantom containing spheres with two different uptakes relative to the background and CRC was measured for each hot sphere. We find that using TOF information leads to reduce artifacts in a partial ring detector design and helps to achieve more accurate image reconstruction. Our results also show that using a spatially variant PSF model or incorporating DOI capable detector leads to improved and more uniform spatial resolution and CRC over the whole FOV. Additional work is ongoing to study the impact of the PSF modeling or/and DOI capable detector design in a partial ring scanner for reduced parallax error.
Risk factor analysis of medical litigation outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology: A retrospective cohort study of 344 claims in Japan

Kyosuke Kamijo,Ayako Shibata,Norio Yamamoto,Jun Watanabe,Takashi Watari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102752

Abstract:Aim: Medical errors are critical in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) and contribute to high litigation risks. However, few studies have examined system and diagnostic errors as potential preventable problems. This study aimed to enhance medical safety and reduce litigation by identifying and addressing key contributory factors. Methods: We retrospectively searched the national Japanese malpractice claims database for OB/GYN cases between 1961 and 2017. We evaluated provider characteristics and background information of the patients (plaintiffs). The main outcome was litigation (acceptance or rejection) in the final judgment. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we assessed the associations between medical malpractice variables (system and diagnostic errors, facility size, situation, place, time, and clinical outcomes) and litigation outcomes (acceptance). Results: Overall, 344 malpractice claims were analyzed. Among these, 277 (80.5 %) were obstetric, and 67 (19.5 %) were gynecological. Of the obstetric cases, 193 were perinatal, and 84 were maternal. Malpractice claims were accepted (OB-GYN losses) in 185 cases (53.8 %). In multivariable analyses, system errors (odds ratio 97.4, 95 % confidence interval 35.2-270.0), diagnostic errors (odds ratio 4.5, 95 % confidence interval 1.8-11.3), and clinic (odds ratio 2.7, 95 % confidence interval 1.2-4.8) had a significant statistical association with accepted claims. Conclusion: System errors, diagnostic errors, and clinics were significantly associated with acceptance claims. These findings underscore the necessity of addressing modifiable factors at the physician level and within the healthcare management system to enhance patient safety and reduce litigation risks, thereby ensuring a safer and more reliable healthcare environment for patients and medical professionals.
Hidden Otolaryngology Malpractice Claims: An Internal Review From 2000 to 2020

Mark A Fadel,Jennifer L McCoy,Richard Kidwell,Robert Voinchet,Jonas T Johnson,Jeffrey P Simons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.311

Abstract:Objective: To report key characteristics and patterns of captive insurance claims not publicly reported in otolaryngology across a large tertiary-level academic health system over the previous 2 decades. Study design: Case series. Setting: The tertiary care health system. Methods: The internal captive insurance database at a tertiary level healthcare system was queried to identify otolaryngology-related malpractice claims regardless of final disposition (settled or dismissed) filed from 2000 to 2020. The date of the incident, date of claim, error type, patient outcome, provider subspecialty, total expenses, disposition, and final reward amount were recorded. Results: Twenty-eight claims were identified. There were 11 (39.3%) claims from 2000 to 2010 and 17 (60.7%) claims from 2011 to 2020. Head and neck surgery was the most frequently implicated subspecialty (n = 9, 32.1% of all cases), followed by general otolaryngology (n = 7, 25.0%), pediatrics (n = 5, 17.9%), skull base/rhinology (n = 4, 14.3%), and laryngology (n = 1, 3.6%). Improper surgical performance was cited in 35.7% of cases (n = 10), followed by failure to diagnose (n = 8, 28.6%), to treat (n = 4, 14.3%), and to obtain informed consent (n = 3, 10.7%). While 2 cases are ongoing, a total of 17/26 (65.4%) cases were settled and 20/26 (76.9%) dismissed some or all parties. Dismissed claims had significantly higher expenses (p = .022) and duration from incident to disposition (p = .013) compared to settled claims. Conclusion: This study expands the malpractice landscape in otolaryngology by including data not readily available through public sources and compares it to national trends. These findings encourage otolaryngologists to better gauge current quality and safety measures that best protect patients from harm.
Even A Worm Will Turn: Appendicitis Malpractice Litigation Since 2020

Rahma Menshawey,Esraa Menshawey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310287

2024-07-12

Abstract:Background: Appendicitis is the inflammation of the vermiform appendix, and it is the most common abdominal surgical emergency in the world. Its diagnosis, however, has many pitfalls including lack of a pathognomonic sign or symptoms, and the low predictive value of laboratory testing. Appendicitis is a leading cause of malpractice concerns. Methods: Using Google Case Law, we used the search terms appendicitis, and malpractice to identify appendicitis litigation cases. We included cases published since 2020. We included any case where a confirmed diagnosis of appendicitis was made. We included cases filed for malpractice due to complications of appendicitis and its treatment. Outcomes of interest included: the state the case was published, the defendants, the date of when the patient first complained of abdominal pain to when they had had an appendectomy/treatment, diagnostics and consultations, medical and legal issues, and final verdict/opinion/decisions on the cases. Results: A total of 44 cases were identified, which were screened for inclusion. A total of 14 cases met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Most cases did not present in an atypical way, the majority of patients presented with clear statements of abdominal pain of varying severity. The majority of the defendants were MDs and hospitals. The average time from symptom to diagnosis was 2.4 +/- 2.1 days, while the longest time for diagnosis was 7 days. The leading medico-legal issues were failure to diagnose and delayed diagnosis, while among the cases, 35.7% had outcomes in favor of the plaintiff. Conclusions: Appendicitis remains an area of high risk of litigation. Malpractice suits are often due to failure to diagnose and failure to treat, but there maybe proactive measures to address the modern pitfalls to promote a decreased litigation risk and patient safety
Patterns and trends among physicians-in-training named in civil legal cases: a retrospective analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data from 1993 to 2017

Allan McDougall,Cathy Zhang,Qian Yang,Taryn Taylor,Heather K Neilson,Janet Nuth,Ellen Tsai,Shirley Lee,Guylaine Lefebvre,Lisa A Calder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220075

2022-09-13

CMAJ Open

Abstract:Background: Medico-legal data show opportunities to improve safe medical care; little is published on the experience of physicians-in-training with medical malpractice. The purpose of this study was to examine closed civil legal cases involving physicians-in-training over time and provide novel insights on case and physicians characteristics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of closed civil legal cases at the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA), a mutual medico-legal defence organization for more than 105 000 physicians, representing an estimated 95% of physicians in Canada. Eligible cases involved at least 1 physician-in-training and were closed between 1993 and 2017 (for time trends) or 2008 and 2017 (for descriptive analyses). We analyzed case rates over time using Poisson regression and the annualized change rate. Descriptive analyses addressed case duration, medico-legal outcome and patient harm. We explored physician specialties and practice characteristics in a subset of cases. Results: Over a 25-year period (1993-2017), 4921 physicians-in-training were named in 2951 closed civil legal cases, and case rates decreased significantly (β = -0.04, 95% confidence interval -0.05 to -0.03, where β was the 1-year difference in log case rates). The annualized change rate was -1.1% per year. Between 2008 and 2017, 1901 (4.1%) of 45 967 physicians-in-training were named in 1107 civil legal cases. Cases with physicians-in-training generally involved more severe patient harm than cases without physicians-in-training. In a subgroup with available information (n = 951), surgical specialties were named most often (n = 531, 55.8%). Interpretation: The rate of civil legal cases involving physicians-in-training has diminished over time, but more recent cases featured severe patient harm and death. Efforts to promote patient safety may enhance medical care and reduce the frequency and severity of malpractice issues for physicians-in-training.

A group study of diabetes and the eye.

From Operating Room to Courtroom: Analyzing Malpractice Trajectories in Cranial Neurosurgery

Medical malpractice: managing the risk

Malpractice Cases in Breast Surgery: An Assessment of Litigation Involving Surgeons

Medical Malpractice in Otolaryngology within the United States: A LexisNexis-Based Demographic Analysis

Qlti-15. Medical Malpractice And Glioma

Medical Malpractice in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review of US Case Law

Allegations of Failure to Obtain Informed Consent in Spinal Surgery Medical Malpractice Claims

Retrospective Analysis of US Litigations Involving Dermatologists From 2011 to 2022

Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: An Analysis of Claims in the Netherlands

Cost effectiveness of teicoplanin and ceftriaxone: a once-daily antibiotic regimen.

Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Spine Surgery in Beijing: The Past 6 Years.

Nature of Medical Malpractice Claims Against Radiation Oncologists

A look inside the courtroom: an analysis of 292 cosmetic breast surgery medical malpractice cases

(339) Malpractice Litigation Related to Management of Varicocele: A Legal Database Review

Medical Malpractice and Rhinology

Design optimization of a dedicated breast PET scanner using TOF imaging in a partial ring geometry

Risk factor analysis of medical litigation outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology: A retrospective cohort study of 344 claims in Japan

Hidden Otolaryngology Malpractice Claims: An Internal Review From 2000 to 2020

Even A Worm Will Turn: Appendicitis Malpractice Litigation Since 2020

Patterns and trends among physicians-in-training named in civil legal cases: a retrospective analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data from 1993 to 2017