Perceptions of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review

Patricia Ogba,Oluwaseun Badru,Bonny Ibhawoh,Norm Archer,Andrea Baumann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828460
2023-04-06
Abstract:Background: Malaria is a major global public health issue that disproportionately affects pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Health Organization recommends intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) for its control. Despite its proven efficacy, drug uptake remains low. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) safety concerns have been cited as one of several reasons for this low uptake. Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the health belief model to investigate perceptions of SP use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. We looked for peer-reviewed publications in five international databases. Results: The review included 19 articles out of a total of 246. It showed that pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa have a good understanding of malaria and its consequences, but this does not necessarily translate into increased IPTp-SP uptake. It is worrisome to know that some pregnant women (from 2 studies) did not believe that SP use is beneficial, and several participants (from 4 studies) were unsure or did not see the drug as an effective intervention. Many pregnant women believe SP harms them, their partners, or their unborn children. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals should continue prescribing and encouraging pregnant women to use SP for malaria prevention until a better substitute becomes available.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?