Lateral Bone Augmentation Using a Three-Dimensional-Printed Polymeric Chamber to Compare Biomaterials

Bart van Oirschot,Jeroen J J P van den Beucken,Antonios G Mikos,John A Jansen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0025
Abstract:The aim of this study was to test the suitability of calcium phosphate cement mixed with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (CPC-PLGA) microparticles into a ring-shaped polymeric space-maintaining device as bone graft material for lateral bone augmentation. Therefore, the bone chambers were installed on the lateral portion of the anterior region of the mandibular body of mini-pigs. Chambers were filled with either CPC-PLGA or BioOss® particles for comparison and left for 4 and 12 weeks. Histology and histomorphometry were used to obtain temporal insight in material degradation and bone formation. Results indicated that between 4 and 12 weeks of implantation, a significant degradation of the CPC-PLGA (from 75.1% to 23.1%), as well as BioOss material, occurred (from 40.6% to 14.4%). Degradation of both materials was associated with the presence of macrophage-like and osteoclast-like cells. Furthermore, a significant increase in bone formation occurred between 4 and 12 weeks for the CPC-PLGA (from 0.1% to 7.2%), as well as BioOss material (from 8.3% to 23.3%). Statistical analysis showed that bone formation had progressed significantly better using BioOss compared to CPC-PLGA (p < 0.05). In conclusion, this mini-pig study showed that CPC-PLGA does not stimulate lateral bone augmentation using a bone chamber device. Both treatments failed to achieve "clinically" meaningful alveolar ridge augmentation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?