Abstract:We conducted a simulation study using realistic boreal caribou demographic rates and population sizes to assess how population size and the proportion of the population surveyed impact the accuracy and precision of single‐survey CKMR‐based abundance estimates. Our results indicated that abundance estimates were biased and highly imprecise when very small proportions of the population were sampled, regardless of the population size; however, the larger the population size, the smaller the required proportion of the population surveyed to generate both accurate and reasonably precise estimates. We also present a case study in which we used the CKMR framework to generate annual female abundance estimates for a small caribou population in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada, from 2006 to 2015 and compared them to existing published capture–mark–recapture‐based estimates. Abundance estimation is frequently an objective of conservation and monitoring initiatives for threatened and other managed populations. While abundance estimation via capture–mark–recapture or spatially explicit capture–recapture is now common, such approaches are logistically challenging and expensive for species such as boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus), which inhabit remote regions, are widely dispersed, and exist at low densities. Fortunately, the recently developed 'close‐kin mark–recapture' (CKMR) framework, which uses the number of kin pairs obtained within a sample to generate an abundance estimate, eliminates the need for multiple sampling events. As a result, some caribou managers are interested in using this method to generate an abundance estimate from a single, non‐invasive sampling event for caribou populations. We conducted a simulation study using realistic boreal caribou demographic rates and population sizes to assess how population size and the proportion of the population surveyed impact the accuracy and precision of single‐survey CKMR‐based abundance estimates. Our results indicated that abundance estimates were biased and highly imprecise when very small proportions of the population were sampled, regardless of the population size. However, the larger the population size, the smaller the required proportion of the population surveyed to generate both accurate and reasonably precise estimates. Additionally, we also present a case study in which we used the CKMR framework to generate annual female abundance estimates for a small caribou population in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada, from 2006 to 2015 and compared them to existing published capture–mark–recapture‐based estimates. Both the accuracy and precision of the annual CKMR‐based abundance estimates varied across years and were sensitive to the proportion of pairwise kinship comparisons which yielded a mother–offspring pair. Taken together, our study demonstrates that it is possible to generate CKMR‐based abundance estimates from a single sampling event for small caribou populations, so long as a sufficient sampling intensity can be achieved.

A simulation-based evaluation of methods for estimating census population size of terrestrial game species from genetically-identified parent-offspring pairs

Sources of bias in applying close‐kin mark–recapture to terrestrial game species with different life histories

A statistical population reconstruction model for wildlife populations: A case study with white‐tailed deer and fisher

Simulation-based inference for close-kin mark-recapture: implications for small populations and nonrandom mating

Estimating effective population size using close‐kin mark–recapture

A hierarchical model for jointly assessing ecological and anthropogenic impacts on animal demography

Assessing the suitability of a one‐time sampling event for close‐kin mark‐recapture: A caribou case study

Use of Integrated Modeling to Enhance Estimates of Population Dynamics Obtained from Limited Data

Accounting for Age Structure and Spatial Structure in Eco-Evolutionary Analyses of a Large, Mobile Vertebrate

Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close‐kin mark‐recapture assessments

Avoiding bias in estimates of population size for translocation management

Improving population size estimation at western capercaillie leks: lek counts versus genetic methods

A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations

Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus)

Age-at-harvest models as monitoring and harvest management tools for Wisconsin carnivores

An inbreeding perspective on the effectiveness of wildlife population defragmentation measures – a case study on wild boar (Sus scrofa) of Veluwe, The Netherlands

A Bayesian Model to Estimate Abundance Based on Scarce Animal Vestige Data

Estimating population size with repeated observations of non-invasive sampling in presence of misidentification

Simulation-Based Evaluation of Methods, Data Types, and Temporal Sampling Schemes for Detecting Recent Population Declines

Pedigree‐free quantitative genetic approach provides evidence for heritability of movement tactics in wild roe deer

Age is not just a number: How incorrect ageing impacts close‐kin mark‐recapture estimates of population size