Patient- and cycle-specific factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfers

Verena Holschbach,Hannah Kordes,Jens Erik Dietrich,Thomas Bruckner,Thomas Strowitzki,Ariane Germeyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07019-3
Abstract:Purpose: This study attempted at identifying the main parameters influencing the outcome of frozen embryo transfers. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of 830 frozen-embryo-transfer cycles performed at a German university hospital from January 2012 to December 2016. Main outcome parameters were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rate. Twelve patient- and cycle-dependent factors were analyzed in terms of their influence on the outcome of frozen embryo transfers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for the modelling of the dependency of the different parameters on outcomes. Results: The clinical pregnancy rate in our study was 25.5%, the live birth rate was 16.1% with an average maternal age of 34.2 years at the time of the oocyte retrieval. In the univariate analysis age, number of transferred embryos, blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer, embryo quality and mode of endometrial preparation affected the birth rate significantly. The birth rate after artificial endometrial preparation was significantly lower than the birth rate after transfers in modified natural cycles (12.8 versus 20.6% with p = 0.031). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant independent influence of age, number of transferred embryos, culture duration and mode of endometrial preparation on the frozen embryo transfer success rates. Body mass index, nicotine abuse, a history of PCO syndrome or endometriosis and the co-transfer of a second poor-quality embryo to a good-quality embryo appeared to be irrelevant for the outcome in our collective. Conclusion: Age, number of transferred embryos, embryo culture duration and the mode of endometrial preparation are independent predictive factors of frozen embryo transfer outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?