Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

Connectome and regulatory hubs of CAGE highly active enhancers

Identification of H3K4me1-associated Proteins at Mammalian Enhancers

Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub

Genome-wide identification and characterization of functional neuronal activity-dependent enhancers

Single-cell chromatin interactions reveal regulatory hubs in dynamic compartmentalized domains

Single-allele chromatin interactions identify regulatory hubs in dynamic compartmentalized domains

A genome-wide nucleosome-resolution map of promoter-centered interactions in human cells corroborates the enhancer-promoter looping model

The long-range gene regulatory landscape of cerebellar granule neuron progenitors

Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations

A unified model of gene expression control by cohesin and CTCF

CTCF-mediated chromatin loops enclose inducible gene regulatory domains

Interactome Maps of Mouse Gene Regulatory Domains Reveal Basic Principles of Transcriptional Regulation.

Histone Modifications at Human Enhancers Reflect Global Cell-Type-specific Gene Expression

Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome

Systematic dissection of regulatory motifs in 2000 predicted human enhancers using a massively parallel reporter assay.

Enhancer connectome in primary human cells identifies target genes of disease-associated DNA elements

Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation

Genomic context sensitizes regulatory elements to genetic disruption

Long-Range Enhancer Networks Gradually Emerge as Key Regulators During Human Cortical Neurogenesis

Bystander activation across a TAD boundary supports a cohesin-dependent hub-model for enhancer function