Effect of Acupuncture on Cognitive Function in Patients With Post‐Stroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Ziyan Luo,Wenxuan Li,Jieting Jiang,Jie Sun,Mingyue Zhang,Yaqing Zhang,Lu Dong,Kunpeng Li,Caiqin Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70075
IF: 3.1
2024-10-16
Brain and Behavior
Abstract:This study systematically reviewed and meta‐analyzed randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of acupuncture on post‐stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). The analysis included 29 trials with 2477 participants, indicating that acupuncture could significantly improve cognitive function as measured by Mini‐Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and enhance daily living abilities as shown by Barthel Index scores and P300 event‐related potential. Subgroup analysis suggested that acupuncture was particularly effective at 4 weeks post‐treatment. While promising, the study calls for future research with larger samples and longer treatment durations to solidify these findings. Aims and objective To investigate the impact of acupuncture on post‐stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). Background PSCI is a major barrier to stroke patients' rehabilitation, and acupuncture is one of the treatments. However, the benefit of acupuncture on PSCI is unclear. Design A meta‐analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Up to February 1, 2024, databases in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched. The risk of bias was investigated using the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of treatments. Random‐effect and fix‐effect models were used to report the effects. Results There were 29 randomized clinical trials with 2477 participants included. The findings demonstrated that the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were higher in the acupuncture group than medicine group (mean difference [MD] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) CI [1.26, 2.23], I2 = 59%, p
behavioral sciences,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?