Abstract:Humans often cooperate with strangers, despite the costs involved. A long tradition of theoretical modeling has sought ultimate evolutionary explanations for this seemingly altruistic behavior. More recently, an entirely separate body of experimental work has begun to investigate cooperation's proximate cognitive underpinnings using a dual-process framework: Is deliberative self-control necessary to reign in selfish impulses, or does self-interested deliberation restrain an intuitive desire to cooperate? Integrating these ultimate and proximate approaches, we introduce dual-process cognition into a formal game-theoretic model of the evolution of cooperation. Agents play prisoner's dilemma games, some of which are one-shot and others of which involve reciprocity. They can either respond by using a generalized intuition, which is not sensitive to whether the game is one-shot or reciprocal, or pay a (stochastically varying) cost to deliberate and tailor their strategy to the type of game they are facing. We find that, depending on the level of reciprocity and assortment, selection favors one of two strategies: intuitive defectors who never deliberate, or dual-process agents who intuitively cooperate but sometimes use deliberation to defect in one-shot games. Critically, selection never favors agents who use deliberation to override selfish impulses: Deliberation only serves to undermine cooperation with strangers. Thus, by introducing a formal theoretical framework for exploring cooperation through a dual-process lens, we provide a clear answer regarding the role of deliberation in cooperation based on evolutionary modeling, help to organize a growing body of sometimes-conflicting empirical results, and shed light on the nature of human cognition and social decision making.

Strategic thinking in the shadow of self‐enhancement: Benefits and costs

Framing a Trust Game as a Power Game Greatly affects Interbrain Synchronicity between Trustor and Trustee.

What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?

COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR IN TWO-PERSON GUESSING GAMES: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY1

Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality

A strategic mindset: An orientation toward strategic behavior during goal pursuit

On being unpredictable and winning.

The Effects of Incentives on Choices and Beliefs in Games: An Experiment

Strategically revealing intentions in General Lotto Games

Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games

The ego is no fool: Absence of motivated belief formation in strategic interactions

Decision-making after Continuous Wins or Losses in a Randomized Guessing Task: Implications for How the Prior Selection Results Affect Subsequent Decision-Making

Learning and choosing in an uncertain world: An investigation of the explore-exploit dilemma in static and dynamic environments

Sunk cost effects for thee but not for me: Decisions and predictions involving others

Paranoia, self-deception and overconfidence

Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation

Optimal Strategy in "Guess Who?": Beyond Binary Search

Returning a Treasure: Revisiting the Asymmetric Matching Pennies Contradiction

People's thinking plans adapt to the problem they're trying to solve

Using a theory of mind to find best responses to memory-one strategies

Fast & slow decisions under risk: Intuition rather than deliberation drives advantageous choices