Abstract:Objective: Persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) poses a significant medical challenge, often leading to diminished quality of life for affected individuals. In response to this clinical dilemma, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising intervention aimed at improving the functional outcomes and overall well-being of patients suffering from this debilitating syndrome. In case a therapy with percutaneous lead fails (e.g., due to a dislocation), surgical lead can be used as a stable alternative. This results in a more invasive procedure and does not allow for intraoperative monitoring. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of the use of surgical leads, as there have been only a few case series published so far. Methods: We included PSPS patients that gave consent to a SCS therapy and were treated with surgical leads. Outcome scores concerning the quality of life (Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]), pain related disability (Oswestry disability index [ODI]), sleeping quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), and pain intensity (numeric rating scale [NRS]) were obtained prior to surgery and at outpatient visits after permanent implantation. Results: In this study, 36 patients were implanted with a surgical lead SCS system. One patient developed a new neurologic deficit characterized by left-sided leg paresis attributable to postoperative hemorrhage, and another patient experienced a wound infection. These complications contributed to an overall morbidity rate of 5.6%. In 5 patients (20.8%), the electrodes were explanted within the first month. Follow-up data of 24 patients with a median follow-up time of 21 (interquartile range [IQR] 15-47) months were available. The mean pain intensity at rest and in motion was reduced. Further pain depending disability improved from a median ODIpreop = 38% [IQR 30%-57%] to ODIfollow-up = 21% [IQR 9%-35%] (P < 0.01). Additionally, the Sleeping Quality and the Quality of Life improved concerning the physical (median PCS preop = 22.5 [IQR 20.4-30.4] vs. PCSfollow-up = 41.8 [IQR 35.2-47.0], P < 0.01) and mental (median MCSpreop = 45.4 [IQR 31.1-55.5] vs. MCSfollow-up = 58.1 [IQR 47.6-59.8], P = 0.018) component. Conclusions: SCS with surgical leads is a safe secondary technique to treat PSPS, where treatment with percutaneous leads fail. The results show a promising long-term effect concerning pain intensity and functional outcome.

Challenges in removing an aged spinal cord stimulator: A case study of complete fracture in a 9‐year‐old S‐series paddle lead

Delayed development of spinal stenosis at the spinal cord stimulator percutaneous lead entry point: case report and literature review

Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems

Rate of Complications Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Electrode Removal

Spinal Cord Compression Secondary to Epidural Fibrosis Associated with Percutaneously Placed Spinal Cord Stimulation Electrodes: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Device-Related Complications Associated with Cylindrical Lead Spinal Cord Stimulator Implants: A Comprehensive Review

Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Cylindrical Lead Placement for Managing Refractory Neuropathic Pain: A Case Series with an Endoscopic-Assisted Approach

Spinal Cord Stimulation with Surgical Lead Improves Pain and Gait in Parkinson's Disease after a Dislocation of Percutaneous Lead: A Case Report

Posterior Cord Syndrome After Spinal Cord Stimulation Electrode Lead Insertion: A Case Report

Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Patient With Extensive Vertebral Surgical History: A Case Report

Intrathecal placement of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation leads: illustrative cases

Retrospective Review of 707 Cases of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications and Complications

Spinal Cord Stimulation with Implantation of Surgical Leads is a Sufficient Salvage Therapy for Patients Suffering from Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-A Retrospective Single-center Experience

Comprehensive analysis of substernal lead removal: experience from EV ICD Pilot, Pivotal, and Continued Access Studies

Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Safe? A Review of Its Complications

Preventing technique-related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis

Placement of spinal cord stimulation paddle leads in the thoracic spine using en bloc laminoplasty: A technical note

Extraction and Reimplantation of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Two Cases and a Review of the Literature

Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life With Spinal Cord Stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

350 Surgical Treatment of Refractory Low Back Pain Using BurstDR Capable Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Without Options for Corrective Surgery; 12-month Results From a Paddle Lead Cohort

Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Lead Implantation: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Results