Feasibility of Surveillance for Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of 328 Patients by the Japanese Pancreatic Society
Yuto Hozaka,Takao Ohtsuka,Masafumi Nakamura,Susumu Hijioka,Michiaki Unno,Yasuhiro Shimizu,Minoru Tanabe,Yuichi Nagakawa,Etsuro Hatano,Manabu Kawai,Tsuyoshi Sano,Shinsuke Koshita,Akio Katanuma,Emiri Kita,Keiji Hanada,Yousuke Nakai,Takeshi Aoki,Masahiro Serikawa,Kojun Okamoto,Yoshifumi Takeyama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002254
2023-05-01
Pancreas
Abstract:Objective: We aimed to elucidate the feasibility of surveillance of patients with mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN). Methods: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 328 patients who underwent surgery for MCN at 18 Japanese institutions. Patients with MCN were divided into an immediate surgery group and a surveillance group, which underwent surgery after surveillance. Results: The median surveillance period until surgery in the surveillance group was 27 months (range, 7-165 months). Compared with the immediate surgery group, the surveillance group showed smaller tumor diameter (46 vs 50 mm, P = 0.01), more frequent laparoscopic approach (58% vs 37%, P < 0.01), and less frequent malignancy (7% vs 15%, P = 0.03). The new appearance of mural nodules and elevation of serum tumor markers were associated with malignancy in the surveillance group. Two patients in the surveillance group experienced postoperative recurrence, although there was no significant difference in recurrence or disease-free survival between the two groups. In the surveillance group, the 1-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidence rates of malignant MCN were 0.8%, 5.6%, and 36.5%, respectively. Conclusion: As the risk of progression to malignant MCNs increases over the long term, MCNs should be resected rather than subjected to unnecessary surveillance.