Premorbid adjustment and number of E.C.Ts administered.

C. G. Costello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674377001500111
1970-02-01
Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal
Abstract:It has been suggested (7, 2, 6) that the response to E .C.T . is directly related to the adequacy of the premorbid per­ sonality. A recent review of empirical data (4) resulted in the conclusion that an "inadequate adaptation to life . . ." is associated with a poor response to E . C . T . It seems likely that the essential difference between endogenous and reactive depres­ sions, a differentiation which has been related to response to treatment (3), lies in their premorbid adjustment. Good premorbid adjustment also appears to be related to a good prognosis among schizo­ phrenics (1), and schizophrenics have been divided into those suffering from 1) process schizophrenia (poor adjust­ ment) and 2) reactive schizophrenia (good adjustment). A number of scales have been developed to measure premor­ bid adjustment among schizophrenics, the most popular being the Phillips Scale (5). In order to determine the prog­ nostic significance of Phillips Scale scores among non-schizophrenic depressed patients treated with E .C.T . , a small retrospective study was conducted. The case histories of 85 patients admitted to an Alberta mental hospital during a fourmonth period in the summer of 1966 were examined by two psychology stu­ dents. No patient was included in the group for whom there was any evidence of schizophrenia, mental deficiency, al­ coholism, epilepsy or brain damage. The remaining patients were given a score on the Phillips Scale of premorbid adjust­ ment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?