Design of a Non-Interventional Study to Assess Neurologists' Perspectives and Pharmacological Treatment Decisions in Early Alzheimer's Disease

Gustavo Saposnik,Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavidez,Elena García-Arcelay,Emilio Franco-Macías,Catalina Bensi,Sebastián Carmelingo,Ricardo F Allegri,David A Pérez-Martínez,Jorge Maurino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00466-9
Abstract:Introduction: The current therapeutic landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is evolving rapidly. Our treatment options include new anti-amyloid-β protein disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that decrease cognitive decline in patients with early AD (prodromal and mild AD dementia). Despite these advances, we have limited information on how neurologists would apply the results of recent DMT trials to make treatment decisions. Our goal is to identify factors associated with the use of new AD DMTs among neurologists applying concepts from behavioral economics. Methods: This non-interventional, cross-sectional, web-based study will assess 400 neurologists with expertise in AD from across Spain. Participants will start by completing demographic information, practice settings, and a behavioral battery to address their tolerance to uncertainty and risk preferences. Participants will then be presented with 10 simulated case scenarios or vignettes of common encounters in patients with early AD to evaluate treatment initiation with anti-amyloid-β DMTs (e.g., aducanumab, lecanemab, etc.). The primary outcomes will be therapeutic inertia and suboptimal decisions. Discrete choice experiments will be used to determine the weight of factors influencing treatment choices. Results: The results of this study will provide new insights into a better understanding of the most relevant factors associated with therapeutic decisions on the use of DMTs, assessing how neurologists handle uncertainty when making treatment choices, and identifying the prevalence of therapeutic inertia in the management of early AD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?