EXPERIMENTAL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION.

N. Taylor,C. B. Weld,G. K. Harrison

1933-09-01

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract:MANY theories have been advanced in attempts to give an explanation for the symptoms and death which follow acute obstruction of the bowel. The chance discovery of Stone, Bernheim and Whipple" that death followed the closure of both ends of an isolated segment of the bowel, even though the continuity of the intestine was re-established by an anastomosis of the sections above and below the resected loop, gave a fresh impetus to the experimental study of intestinal obstruction. This observation showed clearly that the mechanical barrier to the passage of food along the digestive tube when the bowel was obstructed in its continuity was not a primary factor in the produc-tion of the symptoms, nor could loss of the absorptive area of that portion of the bowel below the obstructed point be responsible. Within the past ten years or so an enormous amount of experimental work has been undertaken in efforts to solve the problem of acute obstruction, and it is impossible to make even a limited survey of the literaturehere. It will perhaps be of advantage however, if, in order that the aim of the experiments reported in this paper be clearer to the reader, a summary be made of the two main theories which may be said to have impelled the greater part of the researches into this baffling problem. Many workers have supported a bacterial theory in one or other of its modifications. The toxin of the Welch bacillus has been suspected by some2 to be the cause of the symptoms, though recent work gives little or no confirmation of this suspicion. Others have considered that a bacterial toxin itself was not responsible, but that a product of the bacterial decomposition of protein material within the intestinal lumen was the causative agent. Histamine was mentioned in this connection, and though this amine was on trial for years, its guilt has not been established. Indeed, the charge seems to have been a trumped-up one, unsupported by any serious evidence. It is difficult to see how intestinal obstruction can be of bacterial origin. The symptoms diminish in intensity and the survival time is lengthened the lower in the intestinal tract that the obstruction is produced. Bacterial growth, protein decomposition and histamine concentration, on the other hand, all are greater in the lower than in the higher reaches of the intestinal tract. No theory of obstruction can be accepted which ignores the fact that the severity of the symptoms is directly related to the height at which the obstruction is made. At the present time the dechlorination and dehydration theory is in the greatest favour. It was first pointed out by Hartwell and Hoguet3 that obstructed animals which survived for some days showed marked dehydration. Vomiting, it was claimed, was responsible for the disturbance in the body's water balance, and the symptoms of obstruction and death were believed to be the direct sequence of this. Haden and Orr4 were able to prolong the lives of their animals by the administration of sodium chloride intravenously. Unable to account for the loss of chloride by vomiting, these observers advanced the theory, which has not been substantiated, that chloride passed into the tissues to neutralize a hypothetical toxic substance. The following quotations from the recent literature will serve to illustrate the division of