Genetics of Natural Populations. Xiii. Recombination and Variability in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

T. Dobzhansky

IF: 4.402

1946-05-01

Genetics

Abstract:PECIES of Drosophila show little variability as insect species go. Apart S from a size variation which is mostly environmental, individuals that compose natural populations are as a rule uniform in appearance. Notwithstanding this external uniformity, natural populations of Drosophila contain a great store of genetic variants. The principal components of this store are recessive autosomal genes which, when homozygous, modify the viability, development rate, fertility, and other properties of their carriers. These genes are present in the populations mostly concealed in heterozygous condition (for further reference see DOBZHANSKY 1941; DOBZHANSKY and SPASSKY 1944; DUBININ 1946; IVES 1945; SPENCER 1944). The concealed recessive variants are detected with the aid of experimental procedures, the essential part of which is obtaining individuals homozygous for chromosomes or chromosome sections which were carried in wild individuals in heterozygous state. Homozygotes display in their phenotype the effects of the recessives that were hidden in heterozygotes. The most frequently used version of this technique consists in crossing wild flies to laboratory strains which have some chromosomes marked by appropriate mutant genes and inverted sections. Flies are eventually obtained which carry a certain wild chromosome in duplicate, while the sibs of these flies carry the same chromosome only once. Comparison of the homozygotes and heterozygotes for the chromosome permits the detection of any recessive factors which this chromosome may carry. I t is evident that the above technique reveals only the net effects of homozygosis for whole chromosomes. How many genes may be involved in the production of these effects is not immediately apparent. Suppose, for example, that the homozygotes for a certain wild chromosome have a lower viability, a slower development rate, and some visible morphological peculiarity not present in their heterozygous sibs (such diversified effects of homozygosis for wild chromosomes are frequently met with in the actual experiments). What is the genetic basis of these changes? It is possible that the chromosome in question contains a gene for the low viability, another gene for the slow development, and still another for the morphological change. It is likewise possible that this chromosome carries a single gene with manifold effects responsible for the whole complex of characters. Finally, several or many genes may be involved in the production of each character, some of these genes having manifold effects and others apparently restricted fields of action. Experiments described in the present article have been devised to discriminate