Mechanical evaluation of unipolar hip spacer constructs.

F. Kummer,E. Strauss,K. Wright,Erik N. Kubiak,P. D. Di Cesare
2008-10-01
Abstract:The strengths of 3 hip spacer constructs--Steinmann pins, a short intramedullary nail (both cement-incorporated), and a Charnley prosthesis--were determined and compared with the strength of a commercially available hip spacer. The hip prosthesis construct was more than twice as strong as the other 2 constructs and was equivalent in strength to the commercial spacer. For spacer applications in which limited weight-bearing is anticipated, the hip prosthesis construct appears more efficacious, but its pros and cons should be compared with those of the commercial product.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?