Human immunodeficiency virus infects human seminal vesicles in vitro and in vivo.

C. Deleage,Marina Moreau,N. Rioux-Leclercq,A. Ruffault,B. Jégou,N. Dejucq-Rainsford

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.08.005

IF: 5.77

2011-11-01

American Journal Of Pathology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Factors influencing first-time mothers' introduction of complementary foods: a qualitative exploration

Anne Walsh,Lauren Kearney,Nicole Dennis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2250-z

IF: 4.5

2015-09-22

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: Optimal infant nutrition comprises exclusive breastfeeding, with complementary foods introduced from six months of age. How parents make decisions regarding this is poorly studied. This study begins to address the dearth of research into the decision-making processes used by first-time mothers relating to the introduction of complementary foods. Methods: This qualitative explorative study was conducted using interviews (13) and focus groups (3). A semi-structured interview guide based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). The TPB, a well-validated decision-making model, identifies the key determinants of a behaviour through behavioural beliefs, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control over the behaviour. It is purported that these beliefs predict behavioural intention to perform the behaviour, and performing the behaviour. A purposive, convenience, sample of 21 metropolitan parents recruited through advertising at local playgroups and childcare centres, and electronically through the University community email list self-selected to participate. Data were analysed thematically within the theoretical constructs: behavioural beliefs, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. Data relating to sources of information about the introduction of complementary foods were also collected. Results: Overall, first-time mothers found that waiting until six months was challenging despite knowledge of the WHO recommendations and an initial desire to comply with this guideline. Beliefs that complementary foods would assist the infants' weight gain, sleeping patterns and enjoyment at meal times were identified. Barriers preventing parents complying with the recommendations included subjective and group norms, peer influences, infant cues indicating early readiness and food labelling inconsistencies. The most valued information source was from peers who had recently introduced complementary foods. Conclusions: First-time mothers in this study did not demonstrate a good understanding of the rationale behind the WHO recommendations, nor did they understand fully the signs of readiness of infants to commence solid foods. Factors that assisted waiting until six months were a trusting relationship with a health professional whose practice and advice was consistent with the recommendations and/or when their infant was developmentally ready for complementary foods at six months and accepted them with ease and enthusiasm. Barriers preventing parents complying with the recommendations included subjective and group norms, peer influences, infant cues indicating early readiness and food labelling inconsistencies.
Complementary Feeding: Tradition, Innovation and Pitfalls

Maria Elena Capra,Nicola Mattia Decarolis,Delia Monopoli,Serena Rosa Laudisio,Antonella Giudice,Brigida Stanyevic,Susanna Esposito,Giacomo Biasucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050737

IF: 5.9

2024-03-05

Nutrients

Abstract:According to WHO, "complementary feeding (CF) is the process starting when breast milk alone or infant formula alone is no longer sufficient to meet the nutritional requirements of infants, and therefore, other foods and liquids are needed, along with breast human milk or a breastmilk substitute". CF is one of the most important "critical and sensitive periods" in human life: indeed, timing and approaches to solid foods introduction in an infant's nutrition are of utmost importance as potential epigenetic factors from infancy to adulthood. CF is also deeply influenced by each country and single-family traditions, culture, and beliefs. The aim of our narrative review is to analyze traditional CF practices, including innovative and alternative ones that emerged in the last decades, such as baby-led weaning or plant-based weaning, and to evaluate their effects on the risk of developing non-communicable diseases. Moreover, we will discuss pitfalls and misunderstandings that pediatricians frequently have to face when dealing with complementary feeding. Health care professionals must not have prejudices against parents' wishes or traditions about CF; rather, they should support and educate them in case of any alternative CF choice, always pursuing the infant's adequate growth, neuro- and taste development, and the achievement of correct eating behavior as the primary goal.

nutrition & dietetics
Complementary feeding challenges: Insights from Swiss parents' perspectives

Alenica Hässig-Wegmann,Sergio Román,Luisma Sánchez-Siles,Michael Siegrist

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107638

IF: 5.016

2024-08-20

Appetite

Abstract:Parents play a crucial role in deciding what foods to introduce to their infants during the transition from milk to solids. This study examined the challenges they face, including adherence to official complementary feeding recommendations and the struggles and concerns across different stages of feeding. Specifically, this study focused on the initial stage (transition from breastmilk/formula to mashed foods), middle stage (consumption of mashed foods and some fingerfoods, transitioning towards family foods) and late stage (complete transition to family diet). Findings from 22 semi-structured interviews with Swiss parents reveal that, despite being well-informed, practical obstacles such as returning to work, limited time for preparing homemade foods, managing multiple children, and food preferences often hinder adherence. Safety concerns like allergies and choking were prominent early on but decreased as infants grew older and parents gained confidence. In the middle phase, concerns shifted towards pesticides, indicating a growing awareness of food quality. Maintaining a healthy diet was a constant concern, with early reassurance from breastfeeding or formula feeding giving way to worries about balanced nutrition as solids became more prominent. Time constraints were particularly significant in the first two stages, due to the effort of preparing small amounts of mash and later cooking separate meals. Tailored support and clear communication can help parents navigate these challenges and promote healthier feeding practices.
Author's response to reviews Title:Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores Authors:

Wei Pan,Haiyan Bai

Abstract:
Parental Contextual Factors and Decision-Making Related to Periviable Birth: An Integrative Review

Amy L. Wright,Elizabeth Mens,Gausiha Rathitharan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5565

2022-01-18

The Qualitative Report

Abstract:Parents facing a periviable birth, or birth before 25 weeks of gestation, commonly engage in antenatal consultation with healthcare providers to determine a plan of care. Parents’ pre-existing contextual factors, beliefs, and values influence their decisions regarding birth and the care of their infant. This study aims to understand the role of parental contextual factors and best-practices to their integration during antenatal consultation The Whittemore and Knafl (2005) approach to conducting an integrative review along with thematic analysis was employed to determine and present the findings. Results describe three themes related to how contextual factors influence parental decision-making: personal values and hope, religion, and cultural and racial contexts. Parental contextual factors are important to integrate during antenatal consultation, yet how to do this is relatively understudied. A more thorough understanding will facilitate more individualized and effective counselling approaches for parents facing periviable birth.
Practices for introducing complementary foods in Taiwan: A nationwide survey from 2013 to 2016

Jia-Jia Tsai,Yi-Yu Su,Hsi Chang,Hsiu-Chen Lin,Jung-Tzu Ku,Mu-Ming Chien

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2024.09.026

2024-09-25

Abstract:Background/purpose: Introducing complementary foods to infants is a critical stage in their healthy growth and development process. In this study, we analyzed the feeding habits and choices of caregivers in Taiwan during this essential transition period. Methods: Data from the 2013-2016 Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan were analyzed. Using a multistage stratified sampling technique, we collected data through questionnaires on the feeding practices, challenges, and information sources associated with complementary feeding. We also investigated the timing of introducing various foods. Certain feeding indicators recommended by the World Health Organization were modified and used for analysis. Results: Among 439 caregivers of infants aged 2-24 months, complementary feeding typically began at 5 months, and it primarily began with cereals and pureed foods. At 6-8 months of age, 98.29% of the infants received these foods. Only 48.39% of infants aged 6-24 months consumed eggs or flesh foods. Among the primary challenges for caregivers were concerns regarding infants' adaptation to new foods (38.2%), refusal of foods by infants (37.1%), and uncertainty regarding which foods to introduce (11.4%). The main sources of information were friends and family (46.9%), the Internet (46.5%), and baby care books (35.6%). Notably, approximately 51% of the respondents used commercial baby foods. Conclusion: In Taiwan, although the majority of infants begin complementary feeding on time, the introduction of eggs and flesh foods is typically delayed. Given the growing reliance on the Internet in the modern age, accurate feeding information should be disseminated online.
Complementary Feeding in the Clinical Practice: An Exploratory Survey among Italian Primary Care Pediatricians

Maria Elena Capra,Nicola Mattia Decarolis,Brigida Stanyevic,Antonella Giudice,Delia Monopoli,Cosimo Neglia,Greta Ramundo,Susanna Esposito,Giacomo Biasucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16183127

IF: 5.9

2024-09-16

Nutrients

Abstract:Introduction: Complementary feeding (CF) is the process of introducing solid or liquid foods (complementary foods, CFs) other than human breast milk (HBM) or infant formula into infants' diet when HBM or infant formula is no longer sufficient to meet infants' nutritional needs. Primary care pediatricians (PCPs) are paramount in guiding and educating infants' families during CF. Materials and Methods: Our exploratory survey aimed to investigate PCPs' current clinical approach to managing CF. From 1 March 2024 to 30 April 2024, a digital questionnaire composed of 32 multiple-choice questions investigating PCPs' attitudes toward CF in healthy, full-term infants was proposed to 1620 PCPs contacted through scientific societies. Results: The questionnaire was completed voluntarily; 707 PCPs (79.5% female, 66.1% aged over 50 years) fully responded to the survey in the proposed timeframe (participation rate 43.6%). Among the responders, 47.5% recommended traditional CF; 42.1% declared to know the baby-led weaning (BLW) approach and on-demand CF (ODCF), but only 32.8% and 12.5% of them recommended these types of CF, respectively. The vast majority (95%) of participants recommended that CF start between 4 to 6 completed months of age. CF routinely based on vegetarian or plant-based diets was supported by 45/707 (6.1%), only if planned by a specialist by 253/707 (35.8%), and only upon request by caregivers by 257/707 (36.3%). Egg and fish introduction was mostly advised in the first year of life, although in case of a positive family history of food allergy, 13.3% of participants recommended the introduction of egg and fish after 12 months. Conclusions: In conclusion, PCPs did not display a homogenous approach to CF; further studies and educational programs are needed to achieve more flexibility and knowledge on this important nutritional issue.

nutrition & dietetics
Improving feeding practices: current patterns, common constraints, and the design of interventions

Gretel H Pelto,Emily Levitt,Lucy Thairu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650302400104

Abstract:We propose a set of "best-practice complementary feeding behaviors," which were derived by combining principles of psychosocial care with current knowledge in nutritional sciences. We provide a theoretical rationale for assessing and describing complementary feeding practices in terms of what is fed, how food is prepared and given, who feeds the child, when food is fed (frequency and scheduling), and the feeding environment (where). We also discuss the significance of selected sociocultural determinants of these practices for the design of interventions. We then review 18 case studies in relation to these practices and their determinants. The exercise, in which we abstracted data from ethnographic reports, revealed areas of congruence and deviations from best-practice behaviors. The data on feeding practices are described with a common framework to facilitate comparison across sites. Key themes emerging from the studies include the significance of the larger family, the effects of competing maternal time demands, and the importance of parental perceptions and cultural constructs in affecting complementary feeding practices. Finally, we discuss the implications of the findings for future interventions.
Environmental Scan of Online Government Complementary Feeding Resources in the United States

Kelsey L Thompson,Michelle D Graf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001033

2024-06-11

Abstract:Background: Parents commonly seek online sources of information on the important complementary feeding period, but the accuracy of these sources varies. The 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA) states federal government resources should be accurate and user-friendly; however, the quantity, quality, and accuracy of federal resources on complementary feeding is unknown. Methods: An environmental scan of online federal, parent-facing resources about complementary feeding was conducted. The authors reviewed federal resources for concordance of information with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). Quality was evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Results: A total of 112 resources across 2 federal government departments. Overall quality was high as was concordance with recommendations from the DGA for age of complementary food introduction, foods to introduce, and foods to avoid. Allergenic food introduction and textured food progression recommendations were less consistent. Recommendations for improvements to federal resources are made. Clinical implications: This environmental scan only included federal resources for CF. Parents may be accessing other, non-federal resources online. However, given the enactment of IDEA, it is expected that these federal resources will be up-to-date and user-friendly, which was not always the case. Nurses should review the DGA guidelines for complementary feeding and provide evidence-based anticipatory guidance to families, focusing especially on allergenic food introduction and textured food progression. Future complementary feeding interventions may benefit from directing families to online exemplars from federal sources.
Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Complementary Feeding in Preterm Infants

Jun Li,Xiyao Liu,Lin Zeng,Qianling Zhou,Tongyan Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2168528/v1

2022-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background: It has been reported that preterm infants may experience feeding difficulties in complementary food introduction. There is a lack of a comprehensive summary of the current evidence of the difficulties in complementary food introduction of preterm infants and how to intervene or solve these difficulties. So the purpose of this review is to systematically analyze the difficulties and solutions in the existing literature on it. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Scopus databases for the studies about complementary feeding in preterm infants. The time range of the search was from January 2012 to December 2021. Included studies were summarized and organized into two perspectives: (1) the difficulties of complementary feeding in preterm infants; (2) related factors influencing feeding difficulties and possible interventions. Results: A total of 6 articles were included in the systematic review ultimately. Three studies were cross-sectional study and the other three were longitudinal study. The current evidence demonstrated that feeding problems such as vomiting, gagging, food refusal, and chewing and swallowing difficulty might occur in complementary foods introduction in preterm infants. And preterm infants were more likely to experience these difficulties than full-term infants. Possible causes of these feeding difficulties include endotracheal intubation, gastric tube feeding, formula feeding, neonatal surgery, parenteral nutrition, etc. However, the available literatures do not provide specific intervention methods or guidelines to facilitate the complementary feeding in preterm infants. Conclusions: More experiments are needed to explore appropriate interventions to solve the problems and facilitate complementary feeding in preterm infants during infancy, and promote catch-up growth and develop good eating habits for preterm infants.
Early development of dietary patterns: transitions in the contribution of food groups to total energy—Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study, 2008

Kathleen C. Reidy,Denise M. Deming,Ronette R. Briefel,Mary Kay Fox,Jose M. Saavedra,Alison L. Eldridge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0124-0

2017-01-10

BMC Nutrition

Abstract:BackgroundEarly dietary patterns are critical to growth and development and play an important role in development of food preferences and habits. The objective of this paper is to describe when different foods enter the diet and how food consumption changes over the period of complementary feeding.MethodsWe analyzed cross-sectional 24-h dietary recall data from the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (FITS) 2008, a nationally representative sample of young children. Data are presented for 7 age groups: 6–8.9 months (n = 249), 9–11.9 months (n = 256), 12–14.9 months (n = 243), 15–17.9 months (n = 251), 18–20.9 months (n = 219), 21–23.9 months (n = 212) and 24–47.9 months (n = 1461). Per capita energy was calculated from major food groups and specific types of food within each food group.ResultsThe predominant source of energy in the infant diet was milk (breast milk and infant formula), contributing 98% of energy at 0–3 months, and 91% at 4–5 months. At 6–8 months, when complementary feeding had begun for most infants, 69% of daily energy was coming from milk, 11% from grains, 6% from fruits, 5% from vegetables and 4% from mixed dishes. The diet then quickly transitioned until at 21–23.9 months, 26% of energy came from milk, with other key sources of energy being grains (17%), mixed dishes (14%), meats (12%) and sweets (12%). The period from 4 to 14 months was the most dynamic period of change regarding the introduction of complementary foods for all food groups, with a slower rate of change between 15 and 24 months. After 24 months, the diet stabilized and included less energy from milk (20%) and vegetables (4%) and more energy from mixed dishes (18%), grains (16%), and sweets (17%), and began to resemble adult diets.ConclusionsFeeding in the first 24 months shapes dietary patterns, and thus provides a critical window of opportunity to shape subsequent dietary patterns and eating habits. Findings from FITS identified high sweet and low vegetable consumption as key issues. Education is needed for health care professionals and parents on feeding during this important period. These findings can be used to support the development of specific and actionable feeding guidance for parents.
Current Evidence on Nutrient Intakes and Infant Growth: A Narrative Review of Baby-Led Weaning vs. Conventional Weaning

Kinzie L. Matzeller,Nancy F. Krebs,Minghua Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172828

IF: 5.9

2024-08-26

Nutrients

Abstract:Throughout infancy, changes in growth and development are observed, including changes in nutritional requirements; at approximately 6 months of age, when complementary feeding begins, breastmilk and/or formula are no longer the sole source of energy and nutrients. Little is known about the impact of complementary feeding (CF) approaches used during this time on infant nutrition and growth. Baby-led weaning (BLW) has continued to gain popularity over the last two decades, emphasizing the importance of examining the adequacy of different CF methods. This narrative review of 19 studies from January 2010 to April 2024 aims to discuss the differences between BLW and conventional weaning (CW). The definition of BLW varied across studies, and no standard definition has been established. Though no differences in energy were reported, macronutrient and micronutrient intakes were variable between approaches, including for micronutrients such as iron and zinc. Of the few studies with growth data, results comparing BLW and CW were conflicting. Differences were seen in the demographics of parents who chose to follow BLW and breastfeeding prevalence and duration prior to complementary feeding. Additional research is needed to understand the impacts of BLW and CW on nutrient intakes and growth to inform recommendations for infant complementary feeding approaches.

nutrition & dietetics
Beliefs, Evaluations, and use of commercial infant Food: A survey among German parents

Alenica Hässig-Wegmann,Christina Hartmann,Sergio Roman,Luisma Sanchez-Siles,Michael Siegrist

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114933

Abstract:Complementary feeding is a critical milestone for parents, who must decide the extent to which they feed their infants with homemade foods (HMFs) or commercial infant foods (CIFs). The current study focused on how parents perceive and evaluate CIFs and what drives them to use these products. Understanding the wide variety of factors that influence parents' decisions to use CIFs as a food source is crucial to helping them make more balanced food choices for their infants. Data from an online survey with 858 German parents revealed their negative perceptions of CIFs, particularly in terms of nutritional quality and texture, and concerns that CIFs contain higher levels of pesticides and heavy metals compared to HMFs, despite acknowledging the expertise of the infant nutrition industry. These perceptions were likely to be driven by the 'natural-is-better' belief and parents' desire for control over the ingredients in their infants' meals, contributing to their skepticism towards CIFs. Additionally, our study found that while many parents know traditional nutrition guidelines, they are less familiar with recent updates. Parents' benefit beliefs about CIFs and parents' trust in the food industry strongly influenced the use of CIFs, while infant age and parent gender had a less strong, yet significant influence on CIFs consumption. Overall, the present study offers new quantitative insights into the factors that motivate parents to use CIFs. Furthermore, it underscores the need for health authorities to improve their communication strategies towards parents concerning new dietary guidelines.
Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence

Katherine N. Balantekin,Stephanie Anzman‐Frasca,Lori A. Francis,Alison K. Ventura,Jennifer O. Fisher,Susan L. Johnson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12722

2020-09-03

Pediatric Obesity

Abstract:<p>Parents play a critical role in the development of children's eating behaviours and weight status, serving as providers, models and regulators of the food environment. Many research reviews have focused on the robust body of evidence on coercive control in feeding: how parenting practices such as restriction and pressure to eat increase children's risk for developing undesirable eating behaviours and unhealthy weight outcomes. Fewer reviews adopt a strengths‐based perspective focusing on the ways that parents can actively support the development of healthy eating behaviours and weight trajectories. Emerging research on such positive parenting styles and practices offers solutions beyond the avoidance of coercive control, as well as opportunities to highlight parallels between research on food parenting and the broader, well‐established developmental literature on positive parenting. The focus of this review is to summarize what is known regarding benefits of positive parenting styles and practices for child eating and weight outcomes and discuss recommendations for future research. Current evidence supports starting with responsive feeding and parenting during infancy and incorporating structure and limit setting in early childhood, with monitoring and mealtime structure remaining important during middle childhood and adolescence. Areas for future research include: (1) further examination of the implications of identified food parenting practices and styles among diverse groups and caregivers; (2) increased consideration of child factors (eg, temperament) as moderators or mediators; and (3) further clarification of the relationship between general parenting and food parenting.</p>

pediatrics
Considering the Influence of Social Determinants of Health on Parent Feeding Practices

Stefanie LaManna,Brooke Hatfield,Eileen McCann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/anc.0000000000001138

2024-01-19

Advances in Neonatal Care

Abstract:Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the nonmedical factors that influence health outcomes. SDOH can be grouped into 5 domains: economic stability, education access and quality, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context. SDOH impact people's health and quality of life but may also contribute to disparities in access to food, education, and healthcare. SDOH uniquely influence parent feeding practices in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in a variety of ways, ranging from logistical considerations for parent visitation to cultural beliefs such as family perception of human milk feeding. Evidence Acquisition: A hypothetical case example of a preterm infant with a feeding disorder in the NICU is used to connect SDOH that influence prenatal health, parental lived experience, and postnatal medical care to maternal and infant outcomes with implications for feeding practices. Barriers and facilitators to successful feeding practices in the NICU and at discharge are considered for each SDOH domain. Results: This case example increases awareness of SDOH and how they influence parent feeding practices in the NICU, focusing on the intersection of SDOH, parent stress, and oral feeding outcomes. Examples were provided for how to support applying findings into practice. Implications for Practice and Research: By being creating a culture of SDOH awareness, NICU staff can assist families in overcoming barriers by putting supports in place to increase equitable participation in developmentally supportive feeding practices during the NICU stay.

nursing
Feeding Practices and Parenting: A Pathway to Child Health and Family Happiness

Lynne Allison Daniels

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000499145

2019-01-01

Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract:Feeding and parenting are inextricably linked. The complex bidirectional interactions between parent feeding practices and child eating behaviour shape the early feeding environment which in turn interacts with genetic predispositions to lay the foundation for life-long eating habits and health outcomes. Parent feeding and child (and parent) eating are central to the fabric of family life and are strongly rooted in culture and tradition. Yet, many parents experience stress and anxiety related to this ubiquitous parenting task and perceive their child as a “fussy eater” or a “difficult feeder.” Parents commonly misinterpret heritable and developmentally “normal” child eating behaviour, such as food refusal, as cause for concern. In an effort to get their child to “eat well” they respond with coercive feeding practices, such as pressure, reward and restriction. Emotional feeding that uses food to comfort, distract, calm or shape behaviour is also common. Although well intentioned, these non-responsive, parent- rather than child-centred feeding practices are ineffective, even counterproductive. They teach children to eat for reasons unrelated to appetite and, hence, more than they need and fail to support development of healthy food preferences and appetite regulation. Early feeding interventions are needed that assist parents to understand normal child eating behaviour and promote responsive feeding practices and effective food parenting. The aim of this chapter is to review (1) “normal” eating behaviour of young children, (2) the range of feeding practices and strategies that parents use to respond to and try to shape these behaviours, (3) evidence for approaches to feeding young children that have potential to reduce conflict related to child feeding and promote life-long healthy eating patterns that are a key determinant of long-term health and well-being and (4) to provide an overview of an early feeding intervention, NOURISH, which demonstrated a positive impact on maternal feeding practices and potentially reduced parent anxiety and stress related to feeding.

endocrinology & metabolism,nutrition & dietetics
Use of baby food products during the complementary feeding period: What factors drive parents' choice of products?

Grace Hollinrake,S. Komninou,Amy Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13689

2024-06-21

Maternal and Child Nutrition

Abstract:The top motivators for using Baby Food Products were convenience, time saving, and infant's perceived enjoyment of products. The most purchased puree was fruit based and the most purchased baby snack was vegetable puffs/sticks. Baby snack foods were seen to enhance self‐feeding skills, appetite regulation and motor development. It is recommended that infants are introduced to complementary foods from 6 months old, moving from a solely milk diet to eating a family diet by 12 months old. Although home cooking of family foods is recommended, a rapidly growing market producing baby food products (BFP) such as jars, pouches and snacks has developed. These are often accompanied by marketing claims around nutritional, health and developmental impacts despite research highlighting high sugar content. Although numerous studies have explored drivers of infant formula choice and use, little research has examined the drivers of BFP use. This study used an online survey for United Kingdom parents of infants aged 4–12 months to explore use of BFP alongside perceptions and drivers to purchase products. Overall, 271 parents participated (173 used BFP and 98 did not), with a descriptive analysis of closed items and a thematic analysis for open ended text conducted. The top motivators for using BFP were convenience, time saving, and baby's perceived enjoyment of products. The most purchased puree was fruit based and the most purchased baby snacks were vegetable puffs/sticks, with snack purchases being more common than purees in this sample. Aspects such as perceived healthiness drove choice, with snack foods being seen to enhance self‐feeding skills, appetite regulation and motor development. Those who did not use BFP did not trust them and preferred to feed their baby home cooked foods. The findings are important for professionals working with parents, to support them through the transition to solid foods, particularly around raising awareness of marketing techniques and how to check content of foods to make a more informed choice.

pediatrics,nutrition & dietetics
Dietary and Complementary Feeding Practices of US Infants, 6 to 12 Months: A Narrative Review of the Federal Nutrition Monitoring Data

Regan L Bailey,Jaime S Stang,Teresa A Davis,Timothy S Naimi,Barbara O Schneeman,Kathryn G Dewey,Sharon M Donovan,Rachel Novotny,Ronald E Kleinman,Elsie M Taveras,Lydia Bazzano,Linda G Snetselaar,Janet de Jesus,Kellie O Casavale,Eve E Stoody,Joseph D Goldman,Alanna J Moshfegh,Donna G Rhodes,Kirsten A Herrick,Kristin Koegel,Cria G Perrine,TusaRebecca Pannucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.10.017

Abstract:Complementary foods and beverages (CFBs) are key components of an infant's diet in the second 6 months of life. This article summarizes nutrition and feeding practices examined by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees during the CFB life stage. Breastfeeding initiation is high (84%), but exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (26%) is below the Healthy People 2030 goal (42%). Most infants (51%) are introduced to CFBs sometime before 6 months. The primary mode of feeding (ie, human milk fed [HMF]; infant formula or mixed formula and human milk fed [FMF]) at the initiation of CFBs is associated with the timing of introduction and types of CFBs reported. FMF infants (42%) are more likely to be introduced to CFBs before 4 months compared with HMF infants (19%). Different dietary patterns, such as higher prevalence of consumption and mean amounts, were observed, including fruit, grains, dairy, proteins, and solid fats. Compared with HMF infants of the same age, FMF infants consume more total energy (845 vs 631 kcal) and protein (22 vs 12 g) from all sources, and more energy (345 vs 204 kcal) and protein (11 vs 6 g) from CFBs alone. HMF infants have a higher prevalence of risk of inadequate intakes of iron (77% vs 7%), zinc (54% vs <3%), and protein (27% vs <3%). FMF infants are more likely to have an early introduction (<12 months) to fruit juice (45% vs 20%) and cow's milk (36% vs 24%). Registered dietitian nutritionists and nutritional professionals should consider tailoring their advice to caregivers on dietary and complementary feeding practices, taking into account the primary mode of milk feeding during this life stage to support infants' nutrient adequacy. National studies that address the limitations of this analysis, including small sample sizes and imputed breast milk volume, could refine findings from this analysis.
A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit

Sara A Rosenthal,Marie T Nolan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12222

Abstract:Objective: To synthesize the existing qualitative literature about parent ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and to investigate the potential impact of culture on parents' decision making experiences. Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL plus, and PsychInfo using the search terms parental decision making, culture, race, decision making, and parental decisions. Study selection: Qualitative research studies investigating decision making for infants in the NICU from the parents' perspective were included. Studies involving older pediatric populations were excluded. Data extraction: Ten primary qualitative research articles were included. The primary author read all manuscripts and tabulated themes related to parents' ethical decision making. Data synthesis: Study findings were synthesized using meta-ethnography involving translating concepts of separate studies into one another, exploring contradictions, and organizing these concepts into new theories. Key themes included parent involvement in decision making, parental role, necessity of good information, need for communication, desire for hope and compassion conveyed by providers, decision making satisfaction, and trust in caregiving team. A preliminary theoretical framework of ethical parent decision making was modeled based on the proposed relationships between the themes. Conclusions: Parent preferences for their involvement in decision making, their perceptions of communication with providers, and their relationships with providers are all important factors in the experience of making decisions for their infants. Needs of parents were the same regardless the ethnic or racial diversity of study participants.
A Scoping Review of the Complementary Feeding Practices and Early Eating Experiences of Children With Down Syndrome

Laura Hielscher,Karen Irvine,Amanda K Ludlow,Samantha Rogers,Silvana E Mengoni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsad060

2023-11-16

Abstract:Objective: Children with Down syndrome may experience more challenges in their early feeding and may be introduced to complementary foods comparatively later than typically developing (TD) children. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesize the existing literature that describes feeding problems and early eating experiences relating to the period of complementary feeding for children with Down syndrome. Methods: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were searched. Journal articles published between January 1991 and June 2022 that reported on the complementary feeding period with children with Down syndrome were included. Results: Eighteen journal articles met the inclusion criteria. Children with Down syndrome were introduced to complementary foods later than TD children and progressed to more challenging food textures at a slower rate. Gross and fine motor skill delays and sensory difficulties contributed to secondary feeding problems such as difficulties chewing, biting, and reduced awareness of food on lips and tongue. Parents of children with Down syndrome reported exercising more caution and employing more controlling feeding practices compared to TD and had higher levels of concern regarding their child's weight. Conclusions: Guidelines and early feeding support specific to children with Down syndrome should be available before the first complementary foods are introduced and throughout this period. Feeding support should aim to address parental concerns and provide assistance when feeding problems occur, to minimize delays and encourage the optimum development of eating abilities. Future research should address the development of feeding problems during this period and explore possible interventions.

Human immunodeficiency virus infects human seminal vesicles in vitro and in vivo.

Factors influencing first-time mothers' introduction of complementary foods: a qualitative exploration

Complementary Feeding: Tradition, Innovation and Pitfalls

Complementary feeding challenges: Insights from Swiss parents' perspectives

Author's response to reviews Title:Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores Authors:

Parental Contextual Factors and Decision-Making Related to Periviable Birth: An Integrative Review

Practices for introducing complementary foods in Taiwan: A nationwide survey from 2013 to 2016

Complementary Feeding in the Clinical Practice: An Exploratory Survey among Italian Primary Care Pediatricians

Improving feeding practices: current patterns, common constraints, and the design of interventions

Environmental Scan of Online Government Complementary Feeding Resources in the United States

Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Complementary Feeding in Preterm Infants

Early development of dietary patterns: transitions in the contribution of food groups to total energy—Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study, 2008

Current Evidence on Nutrient Intakes and Infant Growth: A Narrative Review of Baby-Led Weaning vs. Conventional Weaning

Beliefs, Evaluations, and use of commercial infant Food: A survey among German parents

Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence

Considering the Influence of Social Determinants of Health on Parent Feeding Practices

Feeding Practices and Parenting: A Pathway to Child Health and Family Happiness

Use of baby food products during the complementary feeding period: What factors drive parents' choice of products?

Dietary and Complementary Feeding Practices of US Infants, 6 to 12 Months: A Narrative Review of the Federal Nutrition Monitoring Data

A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit

A Scoping Review of the Complementary Feeding Practices and Early Eating Experiences of Children With Down Syndrome