Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads
Amanda Sierra,Beth Stevens,Marie-Eve Tremblay,Adriano Aguzzi,Bahareh Ajami,Ido Amit,Etienne Audinat,Ingo Bechmann,Mariko Bennett,Frederick Bennett,Alain Bessis,Knut Biber,Staci Bilbo,Mathew Blurton-Jones,Erik Boddeke,Dora Brites,Bert Brône,Oleg Butovsky,Bernardo Castellano,Marco Colonna,Colm Cunningham,Dimitrios Davalos,Bart de Strooper,Adam Denes,Ukpong Eyo,Elena Galea,Sonia Garel,Florent Ginhoux,Ozgun Gokce,Diego Gomez-Nicola,Berta González,Siamon Gordon,Pierre Gressens,Melanie Greter,Christian Haass,Soyon Hong,Steffen Jung,Helmut Kettenmann,Jonathan Kipnis,Ryuta Koyama,Greg Lemke,Marina Lynch,Ania Majewska,Marzia Malcangio,Tarja Malm,Renzo Mancuso,Takahiro Masuda,Michela Matteoli,Anna Victoria Molofsky,Michelle Monje,Eva Mracsko,Agnes Nadjar,Urte Neniskyte,Harald Neumann,Mami Noda,Bo Peng,Francesca Peri,Clare Pridans,Josef Priller,Marco Prinz,Davide Ragozzino,Anne Schaefer,Michal Schwartz,Mikael Simons,Tuan Leng Tay,Li-Huei Tsai,Alexei Verkhratsky,Rommy von Bernhardi,Hiroaki Wake,Valérie Wittamer,Long-Jun Wu,Tony Wyss-Coray,Rosa C. Paolicelli,Guy C. Brown,Monica J. Carson,Sally A. Cowley,Philip L. De Jager,Bart J.L. Eggen,Christopher K. Glass,Manuel B. Graeber,Andrew D. Greenhalgh,David H. Gutmann,Michael T. Heneka,Frank L. Heppner,David A. Hume,Barry W. McColl,Veronique E. Miron,Jonas J. Neher,V. Hugh Perry,Phillip G. Popovich,Richard M. Ransohoff,Michael W. Salter,Dorothy P. Schafer,Cody J. Smith,Wolfgang J. Streit,Susanne A. Wolf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020
IF: 16.2
2022-11-03
Neuron
Abstract:Microglial research has advanced considerably in recent decades yet has been constrained by a rolling series of dichotomies such as "resting versus activated" and "M1 versus M2." This dualistic classification of good or bad microglia is inconsistent with the wide repertoire of microglial states and functions in development, plasticity, aging, and diseases that were elucidated in recent years. New designations continuously arising in an attempt to describe the different microglial states, notably defined using transcriptomics and proteomics, may easily lead to a misleading, although unintentional, coupling of categories and functions. To address these issues, we assembled a group of multidisciplinary experts to discuss our current understanding of microglial states as a dynamic concept and the importance of addressing microglial function. Here, we provide a conceptual framework and recommendations on the use of microglial nomenclature for researchers, reviewers, and editors, which will serve as the foundations for a future white paper. Names, names, names If the names are unknown, knowledge of the things also perishes. 1 Stafleu F.A. Linnaeus and the Linnaeans: The Spreading of their Ideas in Systematic Botany, 1735-1789. A. Oosthoek's Uitgeversmaatschappij , 1971 Google Scholar —Carolus Linnaeus And yet, we humans instinctively tend to name things and use that name to define their properties. Biologists are no exception: from the time of 18 th century father of taxonomy Carolus Linnaeus, the main purpose of biology has been categorizing the natural world as a way of understanding it. Naming species and grouping them together into taxa served to define evolutionary relationships; even today taxonomy and phylogeny are closely interrelated. But we must never forget that nomenclatures and categories are artificial constructs and that biology is seldom black and white but rather an extended continuum of greys. While giving names is natural and useful, we need to be aware that categorization constrains our thinking by forcing us to fit our observations into established classes. As sociologists say, "categorization spawns expectations." 2 Charmaz K. The power of names. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 2006; 35 : 396-399 https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286983 Crossref Scopus (75) Google Scholar This semantic issue has already been acknowledged by immunologists because, in fact, the given names have connotations that often imply a specific function. 3 Guilliams M. Ginhoux F. Jakubzick C. Naik S.H. Onai N. Schraml B.U. Segura E. Tussiwand R. Yona S. Dendritic cells, monocytes and macrophages: a unified nomenclature based on ontogeny. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014; 14 : 571-578 https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3712 Crossref PubMed Scopus (1101) Google Scholar In this paper, we extend similar initiatives on macrophages, 4 Murray P.J. Allen J. Biswas S. Fisher E. Gilroy D. Goerdt S. Gordon S. Hamilton J. Ivashkiv L. Lawrence T. et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014; 41 : 14-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008 Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed</li -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences