Acclimation capacity to global warming of amphibians and freshwater fishes: Drivers, patterns, and data limitations
Katharina Ruthsatz,Flemming Dahlke,Katharina Alter,Sylke Wohlrab,Paula C. Eterovick,Mariana L. Lyra,Sven Gippner,Steven J. Cooke,Myron A. Peck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17318
IF: 11.6
2024-05-22
Global Change Biology
Abstract:Amphibians and freshwater fishes are particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change due to the limited thermal buffer of freshwater systems and their constrained habitat dispersal capabilities. Therefore, understanding their physiological sensitivity across life stages is paramount for predicting climate change impacts in freshwater systems. Our systematic review and quantitative synthesis revealed consistent global patterns in upper thermal tolerance (CTmax) and acclimation capacity. Phylogeny, methodology, climatic origin, and life stage emerged as significant determinants. We address methodological concerns and propose research strategies to improve our ability to predict species' climate vulnerability, thereby promoting better‐informed conservation efforts. Amphibians and fishes play a central role in shaping the structure and function of freshwater environments. These organisms have a limited capacity to disperse across different habitats and the thermal buffer offered by freshwater systems is small. Understanding determinants and patterns of their physiological sensitivity across life history is, therefore, imperative to predicting the impacts of climate change in freshwater systems. Based on a systematic literature review including 345 experiments with 998 estimates on 96 amphibian (Anura/Caudata) and 93 freshwater fish species (Teleostei), we conducted a quantitative synthesis to explore phylogenetic, ontogenetic, and biogeographic (thermal adaptation) patterns in upper thermal tolerance (CTmax) and thermal acclimation capacity (acclimation response ratio, ARR) as well as the influence of the methodology used to assess these thermal traits using a conditional inference tree analysis. We found globally consistent patterns in CTmax and ARR, with phylogeny (taxa/order), experimental methodology, climatic origin, and life stage as significant determinants of thermal traits. The analysis demonstrated that CTmax does not primarily depend on the climatic origin but on experimental acclimation temperature and duration, and life stage. Higher acclimation temperatures and longer acclimation times led to higher CTmax values, whereby Anuran larvae revealed a higher CTmax than older life stages. The ARR of freshwater fishes was more than twice that of amphibians. Differences in ARR between life stages were not significant. In addition to phylogenetic differences, we found that ARR also depended on acclimation duration, ramping rate, and adaptation to local temperature variability. However, the amount of data on early life stages is too small, methodologically inconsistent, and phylogenetically unbalanced to identify potential life cycle bottlenecks in thermal traits. We, therefore, propose methods to improve the robustness and comparability of CTmax/ARR data across species and life stages, which is crucial for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity under climate change.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology