[Percutaneous cordotomy].

N. Ferreira,N. Azambuja

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_123282

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Ramp Lesion during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)

Mohamed Hassan Sobhy,Wessam Eldin Fakhery Ebied,Mohamed Hesham Abd Elhakeem Ismail

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.400

2024-06-01

Abstract:Abstract Background Ramp lesion is defined as a vertical longitudinal detatchment of PHMM due to meniscocapsular ligament tears that is not greater than 2 cm in medio-lateral length resulting in separation of meniscocapsular or meniscotibial ligament. Aim of the Work The study aims to perform a systemic review and meta analysis concerning outcomes of ramp lesion repair during ACL reconstruction. Methodology Systematic review and Meta-analysis on Patients with ramp lesion undergoing ACL reconstruction and ramp lesion treatment with total of 387 studies matched our search terms. After exclusion of duplicates, 37 studies were initially included based on their Abstract. 27 studies were finally included. The average MINORS score of all non-randomised studies was 8.7/16 for non- comparative studies and 16.9/24 for comparative studies, respectively. Results Our results suggest that medial meniscus repair associated with ACL reconstruction may restore meniscal function by adjusting the anteroposterior length of the torn medial meniscus. Our data demonstrate that more than 75% of medial meniscal tears in the ACL-deficient knee occur in the peripheral posterior horn. If we assume that the anatomy as described by Hughston and Eilers is correct, then care should be taken when addressing these tears, because a strong repair is needed to preserve the stability of the knee. Conclusion MRI demonstrated moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity in the diagnosis of ramp lesion in patients with ACL tear. According to the current systematic review, ramp lesions are common in ACL-deficient knees and are often missed through standard anterior portals. Exploration of the meniscocapsular complex via an additional posteromedial portal is recommended, if MRI suggests a lesion in this area or if instability is present at probing. If the posteromedial view still does not reveal any lesion despite significant instability, soft-tissue debridement might uncover hidden lesions (meniscotibial ligament disruptions). Ramp lesion repair leads to a significant improvement of subjective knee scores, regardless of the specific fixation technique. For stable ramp lesions, trephination and abrasion might be equivalent to ramp lesion repair in terms of postoperative stability.
Influence of Graft Type and Meniscal Involvement on Short-Term Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Casey Moler,Kevin M. Cross,Mandeep Kaur,Amelia Bruce Leicht,Joe Hart,David Diduch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2023-0205

2024-02-01

Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Abstract:Context : The purpose of this study was to compare short-term clinical outcomes between meniscus procedures performed with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), ACLR (ACLR-only), ACLR with meniscectomy/resection (ACLR-resect), and ACLR with meniscal repair (ACLR-repair) for bone patellar tendon bone grafts (BPTB) and hamstring tendon grafts, separately. Design : This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a controlled laboratory setting as part of a large point-of-care collaborative research program. Methods : This study included 314 participants (168 females; mean [SD]: age, 19.7 [4.8]) with primary unilateral ACLR with a BPTB or hamstring tendon. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on meniscal procedure (ACLR-only, ACLR-resect, and ACLR-repair). Postsurgical testing included: isokinetic assessment of knee extension and flexion, single-leg hop tests, and patient-reported outcomes. Multivariate analysis of covariance compared differences between meniscal procedures on the battery of tests, and for each statistically significant variable an analysis of covariance assessed the effect of meniscal procedure within each graft type. Chi-square analysis assessed the influence of meniscal procedure on tests’ pass rates defined as 90% of limb symmetry index. Results : BPTB: ACLR-only had greater hamstring strength than ACLR-resect ( P = .05) and ACLR-repair ( P = .005). ACLR-only had the highest proportion of participants to pass the hamstring strength test ( P = .02). Hamstring tendon: ACLR-only ( P = .03) and ACLR-resect ( P = .003) had higher International Knee Documentation Committee scale scores than ACLR-repair. There was a significant difference in the proportion of participants who scored >90% limb symmetry index on the timed hop test ( P = .05). Conclusions : The influence of meniscal repair on clinical outcomes is dependent on the graft choice. Following an ACLR with BPTB and a meniscal procedure, hamstring function should be more closely monitored for optimal short-term recovery.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
Recombinant protein polymers in biomaterials.

Wookhyun Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2741/4100

Frontiers in Bioscience

Abstract:Naturally occurring protein-based materials have been found that function as critical components in biomechanical response, fibers and adhesives. A relatively small but growing number of recombinant protein-based materials that mimic the desired features of their natural sources, such as collagens, elastins and silks, are considered as an alternative to conventional synthetic polymers. Advances in genetic engineering have facilitated the synthesis of repetitive protein polymers with precise control of molecular weights which are designed by using synthetic genes encoding tandem repeats of oligopeptide originating from a modular domain of natural proteins. Many repeat sequences as protein polymer building blocks adopt a well-defined secondary structure and undergo self-assembly to result in physically cross-linked networks or with chemical cross-linking so that further form three-dimensional architectures similar to natural counterparts. In this review, recombinant protein polymers currently developed will be presented that have emerged as promising class of next generation biomaterials.
Efficacy of Physical Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Non-Randomized Trial

I. I. Radysh,L. S. Kruglova,V. V. Boyarintsev,N. V. Vasilchenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-2-35-43

2023-02-27

Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin

Abstract:Background. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture is the most common knee joint injury, especially in young people with a healthy and active lifestyle. The concept of quality of life has been dynamically developing. The scope of its application is expanding in various fields of medicine to provide a comprehensive assessment of treatment and rehabilitation efficacy. Objective — to assess the feasibility of complex individual physical rehabilitation of patients after early and delayed arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods. Open simple non-randomized trial enrolled 834 patients with the anterior cruciate ligament rupture of the knee joint. In the first group (431 patients), ACL plastic surgery was performed in the early stages — between weeks 2 and 6. In the second group (403 patients), ACL reconstruction was performed in the later stages — from week 7 to 1 year, inclusive. Each group was divided into two subgroups — the main one, in which restorative treatment and comprehensive individual rehabilitation were carried out, and the control group, with rehabilitation treatment in accordance with the standards of postoperative treatment. The study was conducted in Traumatology, Orthopedics and Medical Rehabilitation Unit of Clinical Hospital No. 1. Patients were included in the trial from 2016 to 2021. The follow-up period for each patient was one year. Statistical data processing was performed by means of Statistica 12.0 (StatSoft, Inc., USA). Independent samples were compared using non-parametric criteria: Mann — Whitney U- test and Wilcoxon T-test. Results. No statistical differences were found in the distribution according to gender, age and body mass index. A comparative analysis of scale medians of Medical Outcomes Study 36Item Short-Form Health Survey (MOSSF-36), conducted in patients before surgery, revealed no statistically significant differences ( p >0.05) between the main and control subgroups in both groups. Analyzing medians before ACL reconstruction showed a significant decrease in comparison with population studies ( p < 0.0001, Mann — Whitney U- test). The analysis of physical and mental component summaries via MOSSF-36 revealed statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of treatment of patients in 1 year after ACL plastic surgery and complex individual rehabilitation. Thus, in the main subgroups, the values of treatment efficacy medians were significantly higher than in the control ones, regardless of the timing of ACL plastic surgery ( p < 0.001, Mann — Whitney U- test). The results testify to higher median efficacy values in patients of the main subgroup of group 1 than in other subgroups ( p < 0.001, Mann — Whitney U- test). The study of correlative relationships demonstrated a stronger relationship between the medians of physical and mental component summaries in the main subgroup of the first group (correlation coefficient = 0.76), if compared to the main subgroup of the second group (coefficient = 0.67). Conclusion. The study testified to the treatment efficacy proved using the scales of physical and mental component summaries. They demonstrated more significant treatment efficacy one year after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and individual rehabilitation in the main subgroup of group 1 than in the other subgroups.
Short-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort

Ashraf T Hantouly,Abdulaziz F Ahmed,Theodorakys Marin Fermin,Luca Macchiarola,Vasileios Sideris,Emmanouil Papakostas,Pieter D' Hooghe,Khalid Al-Khelaifi,Bruno Olory,Bashir Zikria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05931-6

Abstract:Purpose: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) alone, ACLR with lateral tenodesis, and ACL and ALL reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort of prospectively collected data on all ACL procedures was performed at Aspetar Specialized Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital between January 2020 and January 2021. Patients were treated with ACLR alone, ACLR with lateral tenodesis, or ACLR with ALL reconstruction. The primary outcome was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (sIKDC) score. The secondary outcomes were the ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores, pivot shift grade, subjective knee stability, and subjective pain on activity. Results: A total of 100 cases were included. The most common technique was ACLR with lateral tenodesis (42%), followed by ACLR alone (38%) and ACL with ALL reconstruction (20%). The mean age was 28.15 years (15-60), and 94% of the patients were males. Meniscal procedures were more frequent in the ACLR alone group (65.8%). There was no association between subjective stability, sIKDC, ACL-RSI, and pivot shift grade and the three ACLR techniques while adjusting for age, sex, and concomitant meniscus procedures at six weeks, 12 weeks, six months, and nine months. However, there was a significant decrease in postoperative flexion in the ACL and ALL reconstruction group by a mean of 22° (95% CI - 40.7 - 3.4; P = 0.02) at 6 weeks compared to ACLR alone, which was not evident on later follow-ups. Conclusion: ACLR with/without lateral augmentation procedures yields similar subjective IKDC, ACL-RSI, pivot shift grade, and subjective knee instability at short-term follow-up. Therefore, lateral extra-articular augmentation procedures are safe to be performed.
Outcomes of Lateral Meniscal Oblique Radial Tear Repair Compared With Intact Meniscus After ACL Reconstruction: A Cohort Study

Erik Therrien,Mark T. Langhans,Abhinav Lamba,Adam V. Daniel,Michael J. Stuart,Bruce A. Levy,Patrick A. Smith,Aaron J. Krych

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231216102

IF: 2.6

2023-12-16

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 12, December 2023. Background:Recently, the posterior horn lateral meniscal oblique radial tear (LMORT) was identified in 12% of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, patient-reported outcomes for repair of this relatively common tear have not been reported.Purpose:To determine the minimum 2-year functional outcomes after LMORT repair at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) compared to a matched cohort of patients who underwent isolated ACLR (iACLR).Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Included were 100 patients (mean age at surgery, 21 years; range, 13-45 years) who underwent primary ACLR between 2010 and 2018. The mean follow-up period was 4.1 ± 2.0 years (range, 2.0-9.2 years). A total of 50 patients with surgically repaired LMORT type 3 or type 4 lesions, defined as partial or complete tears >10 mm from the root (LMORT group) were matched 1:1 based on age, date of surgery, and graft choice with 50 patients who underwent iACLR (iACLR group). The postoperative outcomes were compared between groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score (sIKDC) and the Tegner activity scale. An updated medical history was obtained via the electronic medical record to determine any subsequent complications and reoperations.Results:There was 1 ACL graft failure in each group as well as 5 (10%) reoperations per group. None of the patients in the LMORT group necessitated a lateral meniscal revision repair or partial meniscectomy. The LMORT and iACLR groups reported comparable sIKDC scores (92.5 ± 6.8 vs 91.9 ± 8.2, respectively; P = .712) as well as Tegner scores (6.7 ± 1.8 vs 6.6 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .910) at final follow-up. No failures of the LMORT repairs were reported.Conclusion:The study findings demonstrated that reoperations, graft failure rates, patient-reported outcomes, and patient activity levels at ≥2 years after type 3 and 4 LMORT repairs at the time of ACLR compared favorably with those of a matched cohort of patients who underwent iACLR with intact meniscus.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Effect of Meniscal Repair on Joint Loading in Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 3 Months Following Surgery

Joseph Hannon,J Craig Garrison,Sharon Wang-Price,Shiho Goto,Angellyn Grondin,James Bothwell,Curtis Bush

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2019-0374

2020-03-04

Abstract:Context: Joint loading following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is thought to influence long-term outcomes. However, our understanding of the role of meniscus repair at the time of ACL-R on early joint loading is limited. Objective: To assess if differences in total energy absorption and energy absorption contribution of the hip, knee, and ankle exist in the early stages of rehabilitation between patients who received an isolated ACL-R and those with concomitant meniscal repairs. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Fifty-nine human subjects, including 27 who underwent ACL-R and 32 who underwent ACL-R with concomitant meniscal repairs. Main outcome measure: The total energy absorption and the energy absorption contribution of each joint of both the involved and uninvolved limbs during a double-limb squat task. Results: There were significant differences in energy absorption contribution between groups at the knee joint (P = .01) and the hip joint (P = .04), but not at the ankle joint (P = .48) of the involved limb. Post hoc analysis indicates that preoperative hip and knee loading differences exist and when you control for preoperative loading (analysis of covariance), the postsurgery difference was not significant. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that the additional surgical procedure of MR may not have had negative effects on joint loading during squatting at 12 weeks.
Open book assessment in medical school

N. Sharma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.940877

IF: 4.277

2015-02-01

Medical Teacher

Abstract:used manikins and videos with small group teaching. However, this simulation may not effectively introduce students to the real-life challenges of interacting with children and the non-cooperative child. Therefore, we piloted an interactive ‘live’ induction session during August 2013. Fourteen 5th year medical students received small group teaching on examination and communication skills using well-children volunteers (aged 2–5 years). The sessions were facilitated by consultants and lasted for 2 hours. Questionnaires were distributed to collect both quantitative and qualitative evaluation data using Likert rating scales and free text comments. All students agreed or strongly agreed that the practical session was helpful. All students agreed or strongly agreed that they felt more confident in starting their attachment after the induction session. This creative approach to paediatric induction offers a realistic, yet practical way for students to gain confidence when starting their paediatric placements. It is being adopted across Imperial College Medical School, and further refinements are anticipated. The use of well-children in such training has potential benefits for students as well as familiarising children to the hospital environment.
Assessing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined with Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis or Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana,Dewa Gede Indra Pratama Putra,Dominicus Dimitri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967124s00417

IF: 2.6

2024-10-25

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10_suppl3, October 2024. BACKGROUND:The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of two primary ligaments responsible for providing stability to the knee joint. ACL rupture is a frequent occurrence in sports-related knee injuries. Persistent rotational instability following surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR) has presented a longstanding difficulty. Anterolateral extra-articular procedures (AEAP), including lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament (ALLR), have been employed to address this issue.METHODS:In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to August 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) studies were included. The CONSORT criteria were used to assess the risk of bias. Using Review Manager ver. 5.4. The effect sizes were estimated as log risk ratios and SMDs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS:Of the 17 screened studies, 9 RCTs met the eligibility criteria for qualitative analysis; 7 were included in the meta-analysis. It was found that [OR = -1.56 (-2.02 to -1.06), P < 0.001)] in favor of ACLR+AEAP, this indicates that the incorporation of AEAP in ACLR leads to significantly improved pivot shift test results, thereby enhancing rotational stability. The comparison of pivot-shift alone in LET [OR = 0.40 (0.19-0.81), P < 0.0001] and ALLR [OR = 0.23 (0.11-0.47), P < 0.0001]. The comparison of adverse event rates in LET [OR = 2.34 (1.53-3.58), P < 0.0001] and ALLR [OR = 0.59 (0.36-0.95), P = 0.03].CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis has found that use of either LET or ALLR in addition to ACLR enhances mechanical results. Patients who received both additional procedures along with ACLR exhibited better pivot-shift grades than those who only had ACLR. Moreover, both combined approaches resulted in lower rates of ACL re-rupture compared to ACLR alone. Notably, ALLR also led to lower rates of ACL re-rupture compared to LET.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Meniscus Repair Does Not Result in an Inferior Short-term Outcome Compared With Meniscus Resection: An Analysis of 5,378 Patients With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Riccardo Cristiani,Andreas Parling,Magnus Forssblad,Gunnar Edman,Björn Engström,Anders Stålman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.124

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the preoperative and 1- and 2-year postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores between isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and ACLR with additional medial meniscus (MM) and/or lateral meniscus (LM) resection or repair. Methods: A total of 5,378 patients who underwent primary ACLR, with no associated ligament injuries, at our institution from January 2005 to December 2015 were included. The KOOS subscale scores were used to evaluate patients preoperatively and at 1- and 2-year postoperative follow-up assessments. Patients who underwent isolated ACLR and those who underwent ACLR with additional MM resection, MM repair, LM resection, LM repair, MM plus LM resection, or MM plus LM repair were compared by use of an analysis of covariance, with age, sex, graft, and cartilage injury as covariates. Results: Postoperatively, at both 1- and 2-year follow-up assessments, no significant differences were found between the groups for any of the 5 KOOS subscales. Preoperatively, a significant difference between the groups was found for the KOOS Symptoms (P < .001), Pain (P < .001), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (P < .001), and Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) (P = .01) subscale scores. The lowest scores were found for the group undergoing ACLR and MM plus LM repair (Symptoms, 70.1 ± 17.3; Pain, 71.4 ± 18.5; ADL, 80.6 ± 20.5; and Sport/Rec, 35.7 ± 28.1), whereas the mean scores for the other groups ranged from 71.2 ± 18.7 to 76.5 ± 17.1 for Symptoms, from 76.1 ± 17.0 to 80.1 ± 15.5 for Pain, from 84.5 ± 16.8 to 88.1 ± 14.2 for ADL, and from 44.2 ± 28.3 to 49.1 ± 28.5 for Sport/Rec. Conclusions: Patients undergoing isolated ACLR and those undergoing ACLR with additional MM and/or LM resection or repair obtained equivalent results for each of the KOOS subscales at the 1- and 2-year postoperative follow-up assessments. Differences between the groups were only detectable preoperatively, with patients undergoing ACLR and MM plus LM repair showing the lowest scores for the KOOS Symptoms, Pain, ADL, and Sport/Rec subscales. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.
The Effect of Factors from Different Time Points on Psychological Readiness Following ACL Reconstruction

Haleigh M. Hopper,Amelia S. Bruce Leicht,Xavier D. Thompson,F. Winston Gwathmey,Mark D. Miller,Brian C. Werner,Stephen F. Brockmeier,David R. Diduch,Joseph M. Hart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.05.002

IF: 2.92

2024-05-24

Physical Therapy in Sport

Abstract:Objective The purpose of this study was to examine factors correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity (RTA) after ACLR. Design cross sectional study Setting controlled laboratory Participants 164 patients (82M/82F, 22.5±8.9yr, 171.6±11.0cm, 77.4±18.6kg, 8.6±3.4 months post-ACLR) participated in this study after a primary, isolated, and uncomplicated ACLR. Main Outcome Measures ACL Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI). Results ACL-RSI scores demonstrated a weak positive correlation with activity level at the time of injury and a fair positive correlation with activity level at the time of post-operative testing ( p -values: 0.004, <0.001). ACL-RSI scores showed a statistically significant fair negative correlation with pain and a moderate negative correlation with kinesiophobia during rehabilitation ( p -values: <0.001, <0.001). There was no statistical significance between ACL-RSI and the surgical variables ( p -value range: 0.10-0.61). Conclusions Outcomes from testing during postoperative rehabilitation were most correlated with psychological readiness to RTA after ACLR. Increased pain and kinesiophobia were associated with a decreased psychological readiness. Increased activity level prior to injury and activity level at the time of testing during rehabilitation were both correlated with increased psychological readiness. Psychological readiness to RTA may need to be customized based on potentially modifiable patient-specific factors during the post-operative rehabilitation.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
The effect of meniscal repair on strength deficits 6 months after ACL reconstruction

M Wenning,A H Heitner,M Mauch,D Gehring,C Ramsenthaler,J Paul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03347-0

Abstract:Introduction: Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be accompanied by meniscal lesions. Generally, the rehabilitation protocols are altered by meniscal repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of meniscal repair on the early recovery of thigh muscle strength in ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Materials and methods: We performed a matched cohort analysis of n = 122 isolated ACLR (CON) compared to n = 61 ACLR with meniscal repair (ACLR + MR). The subgroups of meniscal repair consisted of 30 patients who had undergone medial meniscus repairs (MM), 19 lateral meniscus repairs (LM) and 12 repairs of medial and lateral meniscus (BM). Isokinetic strength measurement was performed pre-operatively and 6 months post-surgery to perform a cross-sectional and a longitudinal analysis. All injuries were unilateral, and the outcome measures were compared to the non-affected contralateral leg. Results: Six months postoperatively overall there is no significant difference between the groups (extension strength MR 82% vs. CON 85% and flexion strength 86% vs. 88%, resp.). Subgroup analysis showed that medial repairs exhibit a comparable leg symmetry while lateral repairs performed worse with leg symmetry being 76% in extension and 81% in flexion strength. Patients undergoing BM repair performed in between lateral and medial repairs (82% extension, 86% flexion). Conclusion: Generally, meniscal repair in conjunction with ACLR does not significantly alter the recovery of limb symmetry in strength at 6 months postoperatively. Interestingly, medial repairs seem to perform superior to lateral meniscal repair and repair of both menisci. Since the recovery of symmetric strength is a major factor in rehabilitation testing, these results will help to advise surgeons on appropriate rehabilitation protocols and setting realistic goals for the injured athlete. Level of evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.
Comparative Effectiveness of Supervised and Home-Based Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes

Rehan Iftikhar Bukhari Syed,Laszlo Rudolf Hangody,Gergely Frischmann,Petra Kós,Bence Kopper,István Berkes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082245

IF: 3.9

2024-04-12

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: After the increasingly common anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedure in competitive athletes, rehabilitation is crucial for facilitating a timely return to sports (RTS) and preventing re-injury. This pilot study investigates the patient-reported outcomes of postoperative rehabilitation in competitive athletes, comparing supervised rehabilitation (SVR) and home-based rehabilitation (HBR). Methods: After ACLR, 60 (out of 74 screened) athletes were recruited and equally divided into HBR and SVR groups using non-probability convenience sampling, with each group comprising 15 males and 15 females. The rehabilitation outcomes in the respective groups were evaluated at 8 months using measures (Tegner Activity Scale [TAS], International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form [IKDC-SKF], ACL Return to Sport after Injury [ACL-RSI]) and objective parameters (isometric muscle strength, hamstring/quadricep asymmetry). RTS was evaluated at 9 months, with ACL re-injury rates recorded approximately 6 months post-RTS. Results: Both groups exhibited decreased TAS scores (HBR: 8 to 6, SVR: 8 to 7), with the SVR group demonstrating superior postoperative IKDC-SKF scores (81.82 vs. 68.43) and lower ACL-RSI scores (49.46 vs. 55.25). Isometric and isokinetic muscle strength, along with asymmetry values, was higher in the SVR group 8 months post-ACLR (p < 0.05). The SVR group showed a higher RTS rate to the same level (76.6% vs. 53.3%), while the re-injury rate was the same in both the rehabilitation groups (3.3%). Conclusions: Although both rehabilitation approaches yielded comparable outcomes, SVR may demonstrate some superior biomechanical improvements in athletes, resulting in a higher RTS rate. However, the psychological outcomes and re-injury rates did not significantly differ between the groups, emphasizing the need to address individual psychological needs during rehabilitation. Further investigation is recommended with a larger sample size to address the differences of gender among competitive athletes.

medicine, general & internal
Comparative Study on Outcome of Early Aggressive and Standard Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

M. Johar

Abstract:Background: Anterior cruciate ligament rupture is one of the most common debilitating knee injuries that can result in significant functional impairment. Although ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) is a commonly practiced surgical intervention, controversy still lingers with regard to graft selection and rehabilitation protocol, both of which are largely influenced by surgeon preference. The post-operative restrictions are largely based on the theory of graft and fixation vulnerability, with concerns related to compromising the biological healing process of the reconstructed graft during the first 12 weeks postoperatively. To date, controversy still lingers in evaluating the effects that aggressive rehabilitation has on clinical outcomes with semitendinosus graft. The aim of this study was to investigate whether immediate full weight bearing combined with aggressive rehabilitation in ACL-R significantly altered postoperative outcome over one year, relative to a program that included partial weight bearing and standard rehabilitation protocol in the immediate post-operative period. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial, with all patients being recruited by a single senior orthopedic surgeon at our institute after a confirmed diagnosis of an isolated ACL rupture by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Seventy patients were enrolled in the study from June 2015 to August 2017. Informed consent was taken. Clearance from ethical committee of the institute was taken. Patients were evaluated pre operatively and post operatively at the end of 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year for outcomes. Results: In this prospective study conducted with seventy patients, we found better results in group 2 (full weight bearing) as compared to group 2 ( partial weight bearing) in terms of IKDC scoring, range of motion (ROM), ROM difference from opposite knee and fixed flexion deformity. The results were statistically significant. Conclusion: We conclude that aggressive rehabilitation to be superior to standard rehabilitation after isolated ACL-R using STG . .

Medicine,Engineering
Clinical Outcomes of Different Management Techniques for Medial Meniscal Type 3 Ramp Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis Between All-inside Repair, Suture Hook Repair, and Lesions Left In Situ

Adrien Saint-Etienne,Rayane Benhenneda,Thais Dutra Vieira,Jean-Marie Fayard,Mathieu Thaunat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241232088

IF: 4.8

2024-03-27

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:There is ongoing debate about the best way to manage ramp lesions at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Type 3 lesions are not visible by the transnotch approach without superior debridement, making the management debate even more problematic.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of secondary surgical interventions according to the management method of a type 3 ramp lesion concomitant with primary ACLR. The hypothesis was that the rate of secondary ACL or meniscal interventions would be higher in patients who underwent all-inside repair.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent primary ACLR with a type 3 ramp lesion between January 2012 and May 2020, regardless of the treatment method, was performed. The main criterion analyzed in this cohort was a secondary surgical intervention, defined as revision ACLR or a reintervention of the repaired meniscus. A survivorship analysis was performed to evaluate secondary surgical interventions in 3 groups: all-inside repair, suture hook repair, and left in situ. The following data were collected preoperatively and at the last follow-up: patient characteristics, time to surgery, side-to-side difference in laxity, pivot shift, Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner score, and meniscal repair failure rate.Results:A total of 113 patients who underwent type 3 ramp lesion repair concomitant with ACLR were included: 52 (46.0%) in the all-inside repair group, 23 (20.4%) in the suture hook repair group, and 38 (33.6%) in the lesion left in situ group. There were 17 patients (15.0%) who underwent a secondary intervention because of ACL graft failure (n = 6) or meniscal repair failure (n = 15 [4 of whom underwent a concomitant ACL reintervention]). Overall, 62 patients (54.9%) underwent combined ACLR and anterolateral ligament reconstruction, while 51 patients (45.1%) underwent isolated ACLR. In the adjusted Cox model, the type of meniscal repair was not statistically significantly associated with secondary surgical interventions. The only risk factor for secondary surgical interventions in this cohort was isolated ACLR (hazard ratio, 8.077; P = .007).Conclusion:The rates of secondary surgical interventions after medial meniscal type 3 ramp lesion repair concomitant with ACLR were similar regardless of the management method of the meniscal lesion. Despite not being associated with meniscal treatment, this rate was 8 times higher for patients who underwent isolated ACLR in this cohort; this is probably because of the protection that lateral extra-articular procedures provide to the ACL graft.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Clinical, Biomechanical, and Self-reported Health Status After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Repair in Soccer Players: Results at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up

Lorenzo Moretti,Ilaria Bortone,Michelangelo Delmedico,Danilo Giuseppe Cassano,Nuccio Caringella,Davide Bizzoca,Biagio Moretti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231177309

2023-08-02

Abstract:Background: Performing meniscal repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to contribute to the long-term preservation of knee health and gait biomechanics. Purpose: To evaluate the role of meniscal repair in the performance of semiprofessional soccer players who returned to sport after ACLR. Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study included 51 male soccer players (mean ± SD age, 28.82 ± 5.33 years) who underwent ACLR at a single institution between July 2018 and July 2019. The players were divided into 3 groups according to surgery type: ACLR only (n = 30), ACLR with lateral meniscal repair (n = 9), and ACLR with medial meniscal repair (n = 12). Outcomes were evaluated through clinical examination, self-reported health questionnaires (Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Tegner activity score, Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and ACL-Return to Sport After Injury), and biomechanical performance evaluations (balance, strength, coordination, and symmetry tests). Parametric and nonparametric tests were carried out for multiple comparisons. Results: The mean ± SD follow-up time was 20.75 ± 9.38 months. Although no significant differences emerged in clinical and self-reported health status, almost all the physical parameters tested resulted in lower performance in players treated with ACLR and meniscal repair. Moreover, patients with ACLR with lateral meniscal repair reported higher pain and fear of reinjury, with lower outcomes in terms of strength, symmetry, and coordination as compared with the other 2 groups. Balance abilities were significantly affected in players who underwent meniscal repair as compared with those who underwent ACLR only. Conclusion: The findings showed that biomechanical performance measures and fear of reinjury were significantly worse in soccer players with associated meniscal repair at a minimum 1-year follow-up, especially in those with a lateral meniscal tear.
Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Controlled Accelerated Rehabilitation

Ihsan Ozdamar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57761

2024-04-07

Cureus

Abstract:Background An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common sports injuries in the knee region. Currently, anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft and controlled accelerated rehabilitation is a frequently used treatment approach. This study aims to add to the literature the early and mid-term clinical results of the controlled accelerated rehabilitation program we implemented in our clinic to enable patients to return to their daily activities faster after ACL reconstruction. Methodology In this retrospective study, 51 patients (50 males, 1 female) diagnosed with ACL tear and undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft were included in our study. In the femoral fixation of the graft, the transfix method was used in 22 patients and the Endobutton-CL method was used in 29 patients. A controlled accelerated rehabilitation program developed by Shelbourne was employed with some modifications to the patients. Clinical evaluation of patients was performed using Lysholm, Cincinnati, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring systems. Results The mean postoperative follow-up period was 18.7 months (range = 6-36 months). During the physical examination, Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift, 49 (96%) patients achieved excellent or good results, while only two (5%) patients experienced fair clinical outcomes. On clinical assessment using the Lysholm and IKDC scoring systems, 50 (98%) patients demonstrated excellent or good results, whereas only one (2%) patient showed fair results. Excellent and good outcomes were observed in all patients using the Cincinnati scoring system. We found a significant decrease in Tegner activity score pre-surgery, which significantly increased post-surgery. Conclusions The combination of Endobutton and cross-pin for femoral fixation and staples and interference screw for tibial fixation is thought to be safe in patients undergoing controlled accelerated rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. The implementation of controlled accelerated rehabilitation enables patients to return to their social lives earlier without resulting in clinically poor outcomes in grafts and implants applied in the early and middle stages.
Survivorship and Outcomes of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Repaired Through a Posteromedial Portal During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Outcome Study With a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Luca Tanel,Mathieu Thaunat,Pierre-Jean Lambrey,Adrien Portet,Antoine Vincent,Thais Dutra Vieira,Nicolas Jan,Jean-Marie Fayard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241288233

IF: 4.8

2024-10-25

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Several studies have demonstrated suture repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus via a posteromedial approach was associated with a significantly lower rate of secondary meniscectomy. However, these studies are not long-term and highlight the need for extended follow-up research to better understand the outcomes over a more extended period.Purpose:To evaluate the long-term results and reoperation rate for the failure of arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus via a posteromedial approach during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:All patients who underwent all-inside suture repair of the posterior segment of the medial meniscus (ramp lesion) via a posteromedial approach during ACL reconstruction at a minimum follow-up of 10 years were included in the study. Side-to-side anterior laxity was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative functional assessment was based on the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score for activities of daily living and the Tegner activity scale for sporting ability. Reinterventions for meniscal repair failure and other complications were also recorded at the last follow-up.Results:A total of 81 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Two patients had an ACL graft rupture with a new ramp lesion and were excluded from the analysis. Additionally, 15 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a total of 64 patients in the final analysis. The mean follow-up was 124.8 months (range, 122.4-128.4 months). Mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity significantly improved from 7.4 ± 1.5 mm (range, 5-12 mm) to 0.4 ± 1.3 mm (range, –3 to 4 mm) (P = .01). The mean subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score increased from 64.3 ± 13.4 (range, 34-92) before the operation to 91.1 ± 10.1 (range, 49-100) at the last follow-up (P = .001). The Tegner activity scale score at the last follow-up (6.3 ± 1.6) was lower than that before the trauma (7.1 ± 1.6) (P = .02). Fourteen patients (21.9%) had a failed meniscal repair and were reoperated. The mean time from initial repair to reoperation was 64.5 months (range, 13-126 months), and the median was 60.6 months. The multivariate analysis, including parameters such as lateral tenodesis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; P = .50), preoperative Tegner score (HR, 1.66; P = .41), preoperative laxity (HR, 1.75; P = .35), age at surgery (HR, 1.02; P = .97), and number of sutures (HR, 2.38; P = .19), did not reveal any factors associated with suture failure.Conclusion:The results show that arthroscopic repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus during ACL reconstruction using a posteromedial approach has a high failure rate at the 10-year follow-up, with half of these suture failures occurring within 5 years after the initial repair.

orthopedics,sport sciences
A Case of Interstitial Pneumonia Induced by Rituximab Therapy

J. Hiraga,Y. Kondoh,H. Taniguchi,T. Kinoshita,T. Naoe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1532/IJH97.04163

2005-02-01

International Journal of Hematology

Abstract:Rituximab, a chimeric human/murine monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, is an effective therapy for B-cell type non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Most of the adverse responses are mild to moderate nonhematological toxicities, which include fever, chill, or skin reactions. Severe respiratory adverse events have been infrequent [1,2]. Recently, Burton et al reported 2 interstitial pneumonia (IP) cases related to rituximab therapy [3]. IP is rarely induced by rituximab, and its etiological roles are still unclear. Here, we report an IP case related to rituximab therapy, for which we investigated its etiology as well as possible. An 80-year-old man with a diagnosis of diffuse large Bcell lymphoma was treated with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone chemotherapy (RCOP). No severe adverse effects were observed during the first course, and after 3 weeks, he was given a second course. With the second rituximab infusion, he had a grade 2 fever and a systemic skin rash. The infusion reaction was abated with hydroxycortisone, and COP therapy was scheduled. Ten days after the second rituximab infusion, the patient complained of general fatigue and had a high fever.A chest x-ray revealed bilateral ground-glass opacities, and a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest confirmed the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia. As respiratory insufficiency advanced, he needed noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation. He was treated with methylprednisolone pulse therapy after a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) examination. He made a dramatic recovery, corticosteroid was tapered, and he was discharged after 3 weeks. No pathogens were detected in the patient’s blood, sputum, or BAL fluids, and results for Pneumocystis carini and Mycobacterium tuberculosis were also negative. Serum antibodies did not indicate the presence of viruses, chlamydia A Case of Interstitial Pneumonia Induced by Rituximab Therapy
Assessing the Impact of Psychological Readiness on Performance and Symmetry in Functional Testing After ACL Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients

Angela M. Mercurio,Elizabeth J. Scott,Dai Sugimoto,Melissa A. Christino,Ryan P. Coene,Emma C. Gossman,Danielle L. Cook,Mininder S. Kocher,Dennis E. Kramer,Yi-Meng Yen,Lyle J. Micheli,Matthew D. Milewski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241274768

IF: 2.6

2024-09-29

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 9, September 2024. Background:Readiness for return to sports involves both physical and psychological aspects of recovery; however, the relationship between psychological and physical variables after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is poorly understood.Hypothesis:ACLR patients with a higher psychological readiness would demonstrate better functional testing results at 6 months.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Participants were evaluated at 6 months after ACLR with various patient-reported outcome metrics: Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale, pediatric or adult International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire (IKDC), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Psychological Stress Experience and ACL - Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Functional testing included quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal strength testing; Y-balance test; single-leg single hop, crossover hop, and triple hop tests; and timed 6-m hop test. Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariable regression were used to determine associations between the limb symmetry index (LSI) on functional testing and patient-reported outcomes. Those with LSI deficits 20% (worse performance).Results:A total of 229 participants (89 male, 140 female) with a median age of 17 years (range, 10.3-30.6 years) were enrolled. IKDC had a moderate negative correlation with PROMIS - Psychological Stress Experience (r = -0.39; 95% CI = -0.49, -0.27; P < .001) and a moderate positive correlation with ACL-RSI (r = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.46, 0.64; P < .001). A total of 151 patients completed functional testing. ACL-RSI demonstrated a positive correlation with single-hop LSI (r = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.35; P = .01) and timed 6-m hop (r = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.42; P = .001). When adjusting for sex, age, and graft type, patients who had <20% deficit on the single-hop test scored 16.6 points higher on ACL-RSI (P = .001), and those with <20% deficit on crossover hop testing scored a mean 13.9 points higher on ACL-RSI (P = .04)Conclusion:Higher psychological readiness for return to sport was associated with better performance and greater symmetry on hop testing 6 months after ACLR, suggesting a potential link between physical and psychological recovery.

orthopedics,sport sciences

[Percutaneous cordotomy].

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Ramp Lesion during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)

Influence of Graft Type and Meniscal Involvement on Short-Term Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Recombinant protein polymers in biomaterials.

Efficacy of Physical Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Non-Randomized Trial

Short-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without lateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort

Outcomes of Lateral Meniscal Oblique Radial Tear Repair Compared With Intact Meniscus After ACL Reconstruction: A Cohort Study

Effect of Meniscal Repair on Joint Loading in Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 3 Months Following Surgery

Open book assessment in medical school

Assessing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Combined with Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis or Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meniscus Repair Does Not Result in an Inferior Short-term Outcome Compared With Meniscus Resection: An Analysis of 5,378 Patients With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The Effect of Factors from Different Time Points on Psychological Readiness Following ACL Reconstruction

The effect of meniscal repair on strength deficits 6 months after ACL reconstruction

Comparative Effectiveness of Supervised and Home-Based Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes

Comparative Study on Outcome of Early Aggressive and Standard Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clinical Outcomes of Different Management Techniques for Medial Meniscal Type 3 Ramp Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis Between All-inside Repair, Suture Hook Repair, and Lesions Left In Situ

Clinical, Biomechanical, and Self-reported Health Status After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Repair in Soccer Players: Results at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Controlled Accelerated Rehabilitation

Survivorship and Outcomes of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Repaired Through a Posteromedial Portal During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Outcome Study With a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

A Case of Interstitial Pneumonia Induced by Rituximab Therapy

Assessing the Impact of Psychological Readiness on Performance and Symmetry in Functional Testing After ACL Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients