Regional modular responses in different bone compartments to the anabolic effect of PTH (1-34) and axial loading in mice

Samuel Monzem,Dionysia Valkani,Lucinda Anastasia Elizabeth Evans,Yu-Mei Chang,Andrew Anthony Pitsillides
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2023.116720
IF: 4.626
Bone
Abstract:Beneficial effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) on bone mass and architecture are described to either simply add to, or to synergise with those of mechanical loading. We evaluate whether interaction with in vivo loading is reinforced by PTH dosing regimen and exhibits compartment-specific sensitivities. Female 12-week-old C57Bl6 mice received daily (7/7) or interrupted 5 day/week (5/7) PTH for 3 weeks (two vehicle groups). All mice had six loading episodes (12N) applied to right tibia (left, non-loaded) for the last 2 weeks. Micro-CT scans were used to evaluate mass and architecture in almost the entire cortical and proximal trabecular regions. Epiphyseal cortical, trabecular and marrow space volumes, and bony growth-plate bridge incidence were evaluated. Statistical analyses employed a linear mixed-effects model at each percentile and 2-way ANOVA with post-hoc test for epiphyses and bridging. We found that daily PTH enhances cortical mass and modifies shape along almost the entire tibia and that these effects are partly mitigated by brief interruption in treatment. Mechanical loading alone augments cortical mass and modifies shape but only in a region proximal to the tibiofibular junction. The effect of combining load and daily PTH dosing is solely additive for cortical bone mass with no significant load: PTH interaction, but exhibits clear synergy with interrupted PTH treatment. Daily, not interrupted PTH stimulates trabecular bone gains, yet load:PTH interaction is present at limited regions with both daily and interrupted treatment. PTH treatment, but not loading, modifies epiphyseal bone but, in contrast, only loading modifies bridge number and areal density. Our findings demonstrate impressive local effects on tibial mass and shape of combined loading and PTH that are sensitive to dosing regimen and exert their effects modularly. These findings emphasise a need to clarify PTH dosing regimens and that advantages could be accrued by aligning treatment accordingly to patient requirements and life-style.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?