Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values and neuroepithelial tumor grading

V. Wiwanitkit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22448
IF: 4.4
2011-03-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:I read the recent publication on minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (MinADC) with a great interest (1). Chen et al. concluded that ‘‘MinADC value may be a simple and effective optional tool for the prediction of neuroepithelial tumor grading (1).’’ I have some ideas on this report. First, the derived sensitivity and specificity in this work is only fair, not good. High false positive and false negative can be seen. The recent report quoted that ‘‘ADC values and ADC ratios in peritumoral edema cannot be used to differentiate edema with infiltration of tumor cells from vasogenic edema when measurements for high-grade gliomas, lymphomas, metastases, and meningiomas were compared (2).’’ Second, it will be more useful if the diagnostic properties on each kind of tumor were presented.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?