Intramedullary or Extramedullary fixation for Intertrochanteric fractures - A comparison study

Iosr Journals,V. Dr.,Pravin K. Vanchi,Mohan M. Kumar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1537401
2015-09-09
Abstract:This study is taken up to compare the results of DHS and PFN in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of hip. To determine the rate of union, complications, operative risks and functional outcomes in intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS and PFN.To determine the effectiveness of PFN in comparison to DHS in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of hip. All fifty consecutive patients were randomized control study into two treatment of Group A for Dynamic hip Screw fixation and Group B for Proximal femoral nailing. According to Boyd and Griffin classification, type I is 6, type II is 27, type III is 9, type IV is 8. Mean timing of Surgery after the fracture is 8.92 days in dynamic hip screw and 6.68 days in proximal femoral nail. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of postoperative mobilisation. Despite the difference in per operative blood loss, the haemoglobin levels and the requirements for blood transfusion were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the hospital stay between the two groups. It appeared that PFN had some benefits over DHS in terms of operative time, blood loss, shortening, neck shaft angle, which has got significant p value. But with respect to the functional results both the DHS and PFN remains the same.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?