Abstract:ABSTRACT Improving our understanding of the transcriptional changes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates is crucial for the creation of more efficient strains to be used in biorefineries. We performed RNA sequencing of a CEN.PK laboratory strain, two industrial strains (KE6-12 and Ethanol Red), and two wild-type isolates of the LBCM collection when cultivated anaerobically in wheat straw hydrolysate. Many of the differently expressed genes identified among the strains have previously been reported to be important for tolerance to lignocellulosic hydrolysates or inhibitors therein. Our study demonstrates that stress responses typically identified during aerobic conditions such as glutathione metabolism, osmotolerance, and detoxification processes also are important for anaerobic processes. Overall, the transcriptomic responses were largely strain dependent, and we focused our study on similarities and differences in the transcriptomes of the LBCM strains. The expression of sugar transporter-encoding genes was higher in LBCM31 compared with LBCM109 that showed high expression of genes involved in iron metabolism and genes promoting the accumulation of sphingolipids, phospholipids, and ergosterol. These results highlight different evolutionary adaptations enabling S. cerevisiae to strive in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and suggest novel gene targets for improving fermentation performance and robustness. IMPORTANCE The need for sustainable alternatives to oil-based production of biochemicals and biofuels is undisputable. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most commonly used industrial fermentation workhorse. The fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates, second-generation biomass unsuited for food and feed, is still hampered by lowered productivities as the raw material is inhibitory for the cells. In order to map the genetic responses of different S. cerevisiae strains, we performed RNA sequencing of a CEN.PK laboratory strain, two industrial strains (KE6-12 and Ethanol Red), and two wild-type isolates of the LBCM collection when cultivated anaerobically in wheat straw hydrolysate. While the response to inhibitors of S. cerevisiae has been studied earlier, this has in previous studies been done in aerobic conditions. The transcriptomic analysis highlights different evolutionary adaptations among the different S. cerevisiae strains and suggests novel gene targets for improving fermentation performance and robustness.

Transcriptomic changes in single yeast cells under various stress conditions

Heterogeneity of stress gene expression and stress resistance among individual cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

[The stress response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae]

A review of yeast: High cell-density culture, molecular mechanisms of stress response and tolerance during fermentation

ER stress‐induced transcriptional response reveals tolerance genes in yeast

Extensive post-transcriptional buffering of gene expression in the response to severe oxidative stress in baker’s yeast

Newly synthesized mRNA selectively escapes translational repression following acute stress

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains performing similarly during fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates show pronounced differences in transcriptional stress responses

Stress induces remodelling of yeast interaction and co-expression networks

Comparative analysis of transcriptional responses to saline stress in the laboratory and brewing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with DNA microarray

Transcriptome Analysis of Differential Responses of Diploid and Haploid Yeast to Ethanol Stress

How yeast re-programmes its transcriptional profile in response to different nutrient impulses

Regulatory mechanisms underlying yeast chemical stress response and development of robust strains for bioproduction

Diverse cell stresses induce unique patterns of tRNA up- and down-regulation: tRNA-seq for quantifying changes in tRNA copy number

Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response

The Stress-Dependent Dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA and rRNA Modification Profiles

Oleaginous Yeast Biology Elucidated With Comparative Transcriptomics

Yeast cell responses and survival during periodic osmotic stress are controlled by glucose availability

Stress tolerance phenotype of industrial yeast: industrial cases, cellular changes, and improvement strategies

Dynamics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptome during bread dough fermentation.