Abstract:Background with rationaleData integration is undertaken for the public good, yet institutions rarely address structural bias in their history, or the ways data are biased due to systemic inequities in the administration of policies and programs. Meanwhile, the public are rarely consulted in data use. Though data infrastructure can be a powerful tool to support equity-oriented reforms, equity is rarely a stated goal for data integration. This raises fundamental concerns, as integrated data increasingly provide the raw materials for evaluation, research, and risk modeling that inform policy, practice, and resource allocation. Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy (AISP) is an initiative of the University of Pennsylvania that focuses on the development, use, and innovation of integrated data systems (IDS). We convene a network of IDS across the United States while supporting developing sites, and as such are uniquely situated to convene experts to develop guidance for centering equity within integrated data infrastructure. Main AimThis project aims to generate guidance for agencies supporting data sharing infrastructure to ensure an emphasis on equity and public engagement for ethical use. Methods/ApproachA variety of data collection methods are being used, including expert panel convenings and interviews with sites piloting or exemplifying strategies for public engagement and equitable data access and use. An extensive literature review is also in progress and will inform a suite of forthcoming products, including a white paper, communications and training materials. ResultsThe results will provide strategies for centering equity across the spectrum of data integration activities, including inclusive governance, staffing considerations, decisions about data quality, and the ethical use of data models and algorithms. Initial findings indicate there are few exemplar sites that routinely center equity within data integration efforts, yet there are promising incremental steps that sites can take to ensure ethical use. ConclusionWhile centering equity within data integration is an emerging focus, initial findings indicate the importance of such efforts, particularly in acknowledging and mitigating the risks of unacknowledged bias across use of administrative data for research and evaluation purposes.

Meaningful steps toward equity, diversity, and inclusion: A call to action

Incorporating Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in a Canadian Biobank

Diversity, equity, and inclusion in a polarized world: Navigating challenges and opportunities in STEMM

The journey to building a diverse, equitable, and inclusive American Medical Informatics Association

Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia

Embracing unity at OMERACT: Valuing equity, promoting diversity, fostering inclusivity

Working Towards an Inclusive Research Culture Through EDI Education, Engagement and Empowerment of the Research Community

Departmental Metrics to Guide Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion for Academic Family Medicine Departments

Embracing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Scientific Community—Viewpoints of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee of the North American Vascular Biology Organization

Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Bioethics: Recommendations from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors Presidential Task Force

Strategies for improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in cardiovascular research: a primer

Improving Organizational Commitment to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging

Supporting Inclusion, Diversity, Access, and Equity in the Infectious Disease Workforce

Inclusion and diversity in clinical trials: Actionable steps to drive lasting change

A Path Forward: Creating an Academic Culture of Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion

Intention Versus Implementation: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice Efforts at Your Clinical Practice

Strategies for centering equity and public engagement in the ethical use of integrated administrative data

Increasing Diversity in Canadian Radiology: From the Hiring Process to Needed Active Retention Efforts

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Research: A Path Toward Precision Health for Everyone

Advancing Equity in Cancer Research: Opportunities for Sponsors, Institutions, and Investigators

Diversity, equity, and inclusion: one model to move from commitment to action in medical education