Abstract:Robotic surgery (RS) is a milestone in minimally invasive surgery. More than 500 surgeons are trained in RS in India, and more than 100 robotic systems have been installed across various centers. RS offers various benefits to patients and surgeons. Although it is rapidly advancing and has several advantages, a robotic system is a complex system that is equipped with complex instruments. Qualitative research aims to take a broad view of the perceptions of stakeholders of RS and to synthesize their views to gain insight into scaling RS. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of relevant stakeholders on RS to learn how to develop the field and make it more affordable. This study is based on grounded theory methodology and uses the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR) guidelines for reporting. Three premier hospitals that are pioneers in RS in India served as the study locations. Purposive sampling was used to collect data from surgeons, nurses, and insurance staff. The surgeons interviewed have national and international exposure and are consulting and performing robotic surgeries across India and internationally. We conducted one-on-one interviews and wrote memos to gather further information before approaching each stakeholder. Samples were determined based on theoretical saturation. Fellowship training, which includes simulation, bedside assistance, and individual cases under supervision, was found to be the standard training method. The stakeholders mentioned a few prerequisites for performing RS, such as prior laparoscopic experience, passion for surgical knowledge and skill, and proper case selection. The surgeons discussed some technical considerations of RS, such as medico-legal issues and mechanical faults associated with it. Although there is increased scope for establishing robotic surgery, surgeons feel that the cost of RS is high. From the interactions with the stakeholders, it is understood that robotic surgeons are the most significant players in RS. Robotic surgery demands more skills and more trained professionals to scale up. Key findings highlight the importance of fellowship training, prior laparoscopic experience, and proper case selection. While RS has potential for growth, high costs, and technical issues remain concerns. Insurance companies include robotic surgery in their policies under the category of "modernized medicine." Depending on the insurance plan that the patient selects, the necessity of the robotic surgery, and the surgeon's justification, the insurance company will pay for the patient's robotic surgery. To make it affordable for patients, complete insurance coverage is mandatory along with creating more awareness among patients. The growth of RS is inevitable in the future with other robotic companies emerging which will ultimately reduce the capital cost and robotic surgeons are pivotal in advancing RS.

Functional characterization of CD4+ T cells in aplastic anemia.

Comparison of early surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection reported by a busy district general hospital in England

Seeing is believing: patients' attitudes and information preferences towards robotic gynaecological surgery

Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

Short-term outcomes of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis

Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients

Robotic surgery for multi-visceral resection in locally advanced colorectal cancer: Techniques, benefits and future directions

The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery

Multidimensional Quality of Life After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Current issues and future considerations for the wider implementation of robotic-assisted surgery: a qualitative study

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic surgery: public perceptions and current misconceptions

Stakeholder perspectives on scaling robotic surgery in India: qualitative research

Colorectal cancer surgery: by Cambridge Medical Robotics Versius Surgical Robot System—a single-institution study. Our experience

Outcomes comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open surgery for patients undergoing rectal cancer resection with concurrent stoma creation

Perioperative and oncological outcomes following robotic en bloc multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer

Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open)