Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound improvedthe regeneration ofinjuried peripheral nerve
Chen Gang,Tao Shengxiang,Chen Changshun,Zuo Haiming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2019.12.040
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective Observe the effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on regeneration after peripheral nerve injury.Methods Eighty rats were randomly divided into implanted and injured rat right sciatic nerve preparation model.The experimental group was treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to treat the experimental group without treatment.The nerve injury of the replacement rats was treated after treatment.The post-regeneration situation is evaluated.Results Rats in the experimental group were treated withSFIand SNCV for4 week [(29.1±5.1),(11.0±2.7) mm],6 week [(27.5±4.5),(15.8 ±2.9) mm],and 8 week [(23.2 ±4.5),(21.3 ±2.7) mm].The time was significantly different from the rats,the difference was statistically significant (t =2.630,3.060,3.140,2.280,2.650,5.120,P <0.05);2 week [(188.2 ±33.4) no/mm2],the nerve fiber density of the experimental group was slightly lower than that of the rats,implanted for 4 week [(2 385.4 ± 394.2) no/mm2],6 week [(2 439.4 ± 334.2) no/mm2] and 8 week [(3 259.7 ± 416.7) no/mm2],the nerve fiber density of the experimental group was significantly higher than the above rats,the difference was statistically significant (t =2.240,2.430,2.740,3.280,P < 0.05);the rats in the experimental group had a mean nerve regeneration rate of 4 week [(1.42±0.44) mm/d],6 week [(1.48± 0.44) mm/d] and 8 week [(1.29 ± 0.28) mm/d].Focusing on rats,the difference was statistically significant (t =2.500,2.840,3.070,P < 0.05);the nerve fiber regeneration and Schwann cell proliferation in the experimental group were significantly replaced by rats.Conclusion Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound can effectively promote regeneration after peripheral nerve injury,and the nerve function is effectively restored,and the effect is remarkable.