Long-term clinical, imaging and cognitive outcomes association with MS immunopathology

Alicja Kalinowska-Lyszczarz,Jan-Mendelt Tillema,William Oliver Tobin,Yong Guo,Stephen D Weigand,Imke Metz,Wolfgang Brück,Hans Lassmann,Monica Giraldo-Chica,John D Port,Claudia F Lucchinetti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51723
Abstract:Objective: In this observational study on a cohort of biopsy-proven central nervous system demyelinating disease consistent with MS, we examined the relationship between early-active demyelinating lesion immunopattern (IP) with subsequent clinical course, radiographic progression, and cognitive function. Methods: Seventy-five patients had at least one early-active lesion on biopsy and were pathologically classified into three immunopatterns based on published criteria. The median time from biopsy at follow-up was 11 years, median age at biopsy - 41, EDSS - 4.0. At last follow-up, the median age was 50, EDSS - 3.0. Clinical examination, cognitive assessment (CogState battery), and 3-Tesla-MRI (MPRAGE/FLAIR/T2/DIR/PSIR/DTI) were obtained. Results: IP-I was identified in 14/75 (19%), IP-II was identified in 41/75 (56%), and IP-III was identified in 18/75 (25%) patients. Patients did not differ significantly by immunopattern in clinical measures at onset or last follow-up. The proportions of disease courses after a median of 11 years were similar across immunopatterns, relapsing-remitting being most common (63%), followed by monophasic (32%). No differences in volumetric or DTI measures were found. CogState performance was similar for most tasks. A slight yet statistically significant difference was identified for episodic memory scores, with IP-III patients recalling one word less on average. Interpretation: In this study, immunopathological heterogeneity of early-active MS lesions identified at biopsy does not correlate with different long-term clinical, neuroimaging or cognitive outcomes. This could be explained by the fact that while active white matter lesions are pathological substrates for relapses, MS progression is driven by mechanisms converging across immunopatterns, regardless of pathogenic mechanisms driving the acute demyelinated plaque.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?