Oral estrogen receptor PROTAC® vepdegestrant (ARV-471) is highly efficacious as monotherapy and in combination with CDK4/6 or PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors in preclinical ER+ breast cancer models
Sheryl M. Gough,John J. Flanagan,Jessica Teh,Monica Andreoli,Emma Rousseau,Melissa Pannone,Mark Bookbinder,Ryan Willard,Kim Davenport,Elizabeth Bortolon,Gregory Cadelina,Deborah Gordon,Jennifer Pizzano,Jennifer Macaluso,Leofal Soto,John Corradi,Katherine Digianantonio,Ieva Drulyte,Alicia Morgan,Connor Quinn,Miklós Békés,Caterina Ferraro,Xin Chen,Gan Wang,Hanqing Dong,Jing Wang,David R. Langley,John Houston,Richard Gedrich,Ian C. Taylor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3465
IF: 13.801
2024-06-02
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:Purpose: Estrogen Receptor (ER) alpha signaling is a known driver of ER-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Combining endocrine therapy (ET) such as fulvestrant with CDK4/6, mTOR or PI3K inhibitors is now a central strategy for the treatment of ER+ advanced breast cancer. However, suboptimal ER inhibition and resistance resulting from ESR1 mutation dictates that new therapies are needed. Experimental design: A medicinal chemistry campaign identified vepdegestrant (ARV-471), a selective, orally bioavailable, potent small molecule PROteolysis-TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC®) degrader of ER. We used biochemical and intracellular target engagement assays to demonstrate the mechanism of action of vepdegestrant, and ESR1 wild-type and mutant ER+ preclinical breast cancer models to demonstrate ER degradation-mediated tumor growth inhibition. Results: Vepdegestrant induced ≥90% degradation of wild-type (WT) and mutant ER, inhibited ER-dependent breast cancer cell line proliferation in-vitro and achieved significant tumor growth inhibition (TGI) (87-123%) in MCF7 orthotopic xenograft models, better than the ET agent fulvestrant (31-80% TGI). In the hormone-independent ER Y537S patient derived xenograft (PDX) breast cancer model ST941/HI, vepdegestrant achieved tumor regressions and was similarly efficacious in the ST941/HI/PBR palbociclib-resistant model (102% TGI). Vepdegestrant induced robust tumor regressions in combination with each of the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and the PI3K inhibitors alpelisib and inavolisib. Conclusions: Vepdegestrant achieved greater ER degradation in-vivo compared to fulvestrant, which correlated with improved tumor growth inhibition, suggesting vepdegestrant could be a more effective backbone ET for patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer.
oncology