Effects of Topical Sodium Fluoride in the Mandibular Teeth

A. L. Russell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345470260050601
1947-10-01
Abstract:One of the puzzles in the study of topically-applied sodium fluoride as a cariespreventive agent has been the apparent relative ineffectiveness of the chemical when applied to the mandibular teeth. While field studies have shown uniformly significant reductions in maxillary caries, Bibby reports only slight and chance reduction in caries of the mandibular teeth following application of an aqueous solution of sodium fluoride (1), or following the use of a fluoride-pumice prophylaxis mixture (2). In a study reported by Jordan, Wood, Allison and Irwin there is a higher incidence of caries in the untreated than in the treated mandibular quadrants following 2 applications of a 2% aqueous solution (3). Bibby has suggested that this may be due to a leakage of the fluoride solution during treatment from an incompletely-isolated lower quadrant to the opposite side, with consequent partial protection of the control teeth (4). On the other hand, Knutson and Armstrong have observed a definite and significant caries reduction in the mandibular teeth of Minnesota children given from 7 to 15 treatments with a 2% aqueous solution, the protection extending through the third study year (5, 6, 7). The Knutson-Armstrong series in particular is reported in sufficient detail to permit the application of some of the methods ordinarily used in the epidemiology of communicable disease, and to permit estimations of sampling error. Particularly useful in such an analysis is the caries attack rate, which expresses the percentage of teeth free from caries at the beginning of a study which became various during the period of observation. When the latest of the Knutson-Armstrong series (8) is further analyzed new light is shed upon the questions of the effectiveness of topical sodium fluoride in the mandibular teeth. In the original Knutson-Armstrong study a comparable group of wholly untreated children was observed for 2 years in order that the opposite-quadrant method of control might be tested. In these children the 2 year caries attack rates in the mandibular teeth were 9.4 and 9.3 in the left and right quadrants, respectively, compared with an attack rate of 9.3 in the untreated right mandibular quadrants of the study children. In this study at least, there is no indication of a leakage of treatment solution to the control side as postulated by Bibby. Bilateral symmetry was observed in the caries incidence of the untreated children. It was concluded that opposite-quadrant controls were adequate and the untreated control group was discarded in subsequent studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?