From Consumption to Context: Assessing Poverty and Inequality across Diverse Socio-Ecological Systems in Ghana
Alicia C. Cavanaugh,Honor R. Bixby,Saeesh Mangwani,Samuel Agyei-Mensah,Cynthia Azochiman Awuni,Jill C. Baumgartner,George Owusu,Brian E. Robinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad76ff
2024-09-04
Environmental Research Communications
Abstract:Local social and ecological contexts influence one's resource base, and thus how poverty and inequality manifest. Local conditions shape livelihood opportunities and determine the available infrastructure, services, and environmental resources, as well as people's capacity to use them. While measures of poverty and inequality guide local and international development policy, how these interact with the local ecological contexts is not well explored. We use a social-ecological systems (SES) lens to empirically examine how context relates to various measures of human well-being at a national scale in Ghana. Using a novel dataset constructed from the 100% Ghanian Census, we examine poverty and inequality at a fine population level over multiple dimensions of well-being. First, we describe how well-being varies across and within different Ghanian SES contexts. Second, we ask whether monetary consumption acts a good indicator for well-being across these contexts. Third, we examine measures of inequality in various metrics across SES types. We find consumption distributions differ across SES types and are markedly distinct from regional distributions based on political boundaries. Rates of improved well-being are positively correlated with consumption levels in all SES types, but correlations are weaker in less-developed contexts like rangelands and wildlands. Finally, while consumption inequality is quite consistent across SES types, inequality in other measures of living standards (housing, water, sanitation, etc.) increases dramatically in SES types as population density and infrastructural development decreases. We advocate that SES types should be recognized as distinct contexts in which actions to mitigate poverty and inequality should better incorporate the challenges unique to each.
environmental sciences