ANCA signaling: not just a matter of respiratory burst.

G. Preston,R. Falk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1523-1755.2001.0590051981.X
IF: 19.6
2001-05-01
Kidney International
Abstract:angiitis, Wegener’s granulomatosis, and the ChurgHarper et al report that neutrophils from ANCA paStrauss syndrome. Over the last decade, the ANCA tients display a higher level of apoptosis and that this scientific community has standardized ANCA testing [1], increase correlates with higher concentrations of surface developed a consensus on the nomenclature of vasculitis proteinase 3 [8]. These findings raise a crucial question [2], and pushed forward the observations that ANCA of whether these patients express proteinase 3/myeloperparticipate in the pathogenesis of vascular inflammation oxidase (PR3/MPO) on the cell surface, placing them at [3]. Of the number of hypotheses relations to how ANCA risk for the development of ANCA-mediated disease, may cause vasculitis, the most prevalent is based on the or whether neutrophils in patients with ANCA are primed work of many investigators who have noted that expresin the circulation, thus causing PR3 or MPO plasma sion of granule proteins on the surface of neutrophils and membrane expression. A recent report introduced the monocytes allows for ANCA interaction with surface concept that subsets of neutrophils express PR3 moleantigens [4–6]. This interaction results in induction of cules on their surface and that the proportion of neutrorespiratory burst, degranulation, and release of neutrophils presenting PR3 is genetically controlled and highly phil and monocyte products into the microenvironment. stable [10]. Indeed, the authors found that the phenotype These activated leukocytes and granule products then of increased PR3 surface expression was significantly interact with the endothelium resulting in its damage [7] increased in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. (abstract; Yang et al, ASN 30th Annual Meetings, 1997). Harper et al investigated the effects of ANCA on macIn this issue of Kidney International, Harper et al provide rophage signaling pathways through engagement of opanother step forward in our understanding of how ANCA sonized neutrophils during phagocytosis [8]. Opsonizamight contribute to the pathogenesis of vasculitis [8]. tion of apoptotic polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) with The effect of ANCA on neutrophils and monocytes ANCA enhanced clearance by macrophages and actiis different from other immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules vated the macrophages to produce increased amounts of [4, 9]. Ambiguous and conflicting data have confused cytokines. Both phagocytosis and transcription require the issue as to the extent to which the F(ab9)2 portion activation of signaling pathways. In fact, a transmemof ANCA molecule mediates leukocyte activation, what brane receptor has recently been observed in C. elegans, influence F(ab9)2 antigen binding has on the Fc receptor CED-1, that mediates phagocytosis. CED-1 is homoloengagement, and whether the Fc receptor engagement gous to mammalian scavenger receptor from endothelial provides the primary signal for leukocyte activation. A cells (SREC) and bears structural resemblance to growth number of technical obstacles inherent in the use of factor receptors, integrins, and lipoprotein receptors [11]. human neutrophils and monocytes explain part of the The molecular mechanisms by which ANCA perturb controversy. Yet, at present, it is reasonable to presume neutrophils certainly appear to require ANCA binding that both parts of the Ig molecule result in a signal for to antigen. With this view in mind, ANCA F(ab9)2 signal leukocyte activation. In vivo, the intensity and regulation input must lend itself to ANCA-specific effects, as imof these signals may provide some of the explanation plied by data indicating a correlation between higher for spectrum of disease severity. However, the full specconcentrations of surface PR3 and increased apoptosis trum of biologic diversity is certainly caused by a number [8]. The point of interest in these data relevant to the of factors, including differences in antigen expression, present discussion lies not so much in the increased apoptosis, but in the implication that F(ab9)2 binding engages the signaling components of the apoptotic pathway.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?