Abstract:Biological and robotic grasp and manipulation are undeniably similar at the level of mechanical task performance. However, their underlying fundamental biological vs. engineering mechanisms are, by definition, dramatically different and can even be antithetical. Even our approach to each is diametrically opposite: inductive science for the study of biological systems vs. engineering synthesis for the design and construction of robotic systems. The past 20 years have seen several conceptual advances in both fields and the quest to unify them. Chief among them is the reluctant recognition that their underlying fundamental mechanisms may actually share limited common ground, while exhibiting many fundamental differences. This recognition is particularly liberating because it allows us to resolve and move beyond multiple paradoxes and contradictions that arose from the initial reasonable assumption of a large common ground. Here, we begin by introducing the perspective of neuromechanics, which emphasizes that real-world behavior emerges from the intimate interactions among the physical structure of the system, the mechanical requirements of a task, the feasible neural control actions to produce it, and the ability of the neuromuscular system to adapt through interactions with the environment. This allows us to articulate a succinct overview of a few salient conceptual paradoxes and contradictions regarding under-determined vs. over-determined mechanics, under- vs. over-actuated control, prescribed vs. emergent function, learning vs. implementation vs. adaptation, prescriptive vs. descriptive synergies, and optimal vs. habitual performance. We conclude by presenting open questions and suggesting directions for future research. We hope this frank and open-minded assessment of the state-of-the-art will encourage and guide these communities to continue to interact and make progress in these important areas at the interface of neuromechanics, neuroscience, rehabilitation and robotics.

Towards Living Machines: current and future trends of tactile sensing, grasping, and social robotics

Progress on Flexible Tactile Sensors in Robotic Applications on Objects Properties Recognition, Manipulation and Human-Machine Interactions

Machines Like Us and People Like You: Toward Human-Robot Shared Experience

Embodied tactile perception and learning

From Machine Learning to Robotics: Challenges and Opportunities for Embodied Intelligence

Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field

Feel-Good Robotics: Requirements on Touch for Embodiment in Assistive Robotics

Wearable Assistive Robotics: A Perspective on Current Challenges and Future Trends

Embodied neuromorphic intelligence

Biofabrication of Living Actuators

Actuation of biologically inspired intelligent robotics using artificial muscles

Leveraging Touch Sensors to Improve Mobile Manipulation

Somatosensory, Light‐Driven, Thin‐Film Robots Capable of Integrated Perception and Motility

Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands

On Neuromechanical Approaches for the Study of Biological Grasp and Manipulation

Bioinspired Embodiment for Intelligent Sensing and Dexterity in Fine Manipulation: A Survey

Robots and Biological Systems: Towards a New Bionics?

Soft robotics for physical simulators, artificial organs and implantable assistive devices

On neuromechanical approaches for the study of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation

Intelligent Tactile System and Human-Robot Interaction for Collaborative Robots.

Shaping high-performance wearable robots for human motor and sensory reconstruction and enhancement