VERTICAL RIB EXPANSION FOR THORACIC INSUFFICIENCY SYNDROME-INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUE

R. Campbell,J. Emans

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Residential Greenness is Associated with Disease Severity among COVID-19 Patients Aged over 45 Years in Wuhan, China

Wenjia Peng,Haidong Kan,Lian Zhou,Weibing Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113245

IF: 7.129

2022-01-01

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract:Evidence regarding environmental factors associated with disease severity of COVID-19 remained scarce. This study aimed to investigate the association of residential greenness exposure with COVID-19 severity applying a retrospective cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China. We included 30,253 COVID-19 cases aged over 45 years from January 1 to February 27, 2020. Residential greenness was quantitatively assessed using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). A multilevel generalized linear model using Poisson regression was implemented to analyze the association between greenness exposure and disease severity of COVID-19, after adjusting for potential covariates. A linear exposure-response relationship was found between greenness and COVID-19 severity. In the adjusted model, one 0.1 unit increase of NDVI and EVI in the 1000-m buffer radius was significantly associated with a 7.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.0%, 11.1%) and 10.0% (95% CI: 5.1%, 14.7%) reduction of the prevalence of COVID-19 severity, respectively. The effect of residential greenness seemed to be more pronounced among participants with lower population density and economic levels. Air pollutants mediated 0.82~12.08% of the greenness and COVID-19 severity association, particularly to nitrogen dioxide. Sensitivity analyses suggested the robustness of the results. Our findings suggested that residential greenness exposure was beneficial to reduce the prevalence of COVID-19 severity.
Population-weighted exposure to green spaces tied to lower COVID-19 mortality rates: A nationwide dose-response study in the USA

Yuwen Yang,Yi Lu,Bin Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158333

2022-12-10

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a huge loss of human life globally. However, few studies investigated the link between exposure to green space and risk of COVID-19 mortality rate, while also distinguishing the effects of various types of green space, considering the spatial distribution of human population and green space, and identifying the optimal buffer distances of nearby green space. It is critical and pressing to fill these significant knowledge gaps to protect and promote billions of people's health and life across the world.This study adopted a negative binomial generalized linear mixed-effects model to examine the association between the ratios of various types of green space, population-weighted exposure to those various types of green space, and COVID-19 mortality rates across 3025 counties in the USA, adjusted for sociodemographic, pre-existing chronic disease, policy and regulation, behavioral, and environmental factors.The findings show that greater exposure to forest was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality rates, while developed open space had mixed associations with COVID-19 mortality rates. Forest outside park had the largest effect size across all buffer distances, followed by forest inside park. The optimal exposure buffer distance was 1 km for forest outside park, with per one-unit of increase in exposure associated with a 9.9 % decrease in COVID-19 mortality rates (95 % confidence interval (CI): 6.9 %–12.8 %). The optimal exposure buffer distance of forest inside park was 400 m, with per one-unit of increase in exposure associated with a 4.7 % decrease in mortality rates (95 % CI: 2.4 %–6.9 %).The results suggest that greater exposure to green spaces, especially to nearby forests, may mitigate the risk of COVID-19 mortality. Although findings of an ecological study cannot be directly used to guide medical interventions, this study may pave a critical new way for future research and practice across multiple disciplines.

environmental sciences
The Associations of Greenness and Incident Depression with Co-Exposed of Particulate Matter

Xinhan Zhang,Fang Wei,Zhebin Yu,Fanjia Guo,Mingjuan Jin,Jianbing Wang,Liming Shui,Hongbo Lin,Mengling Tang,Kun Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2021.p-335

2021-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surrounding green as a part of resilience environment is reported to benefit mental health by direct protection and the mitigation of hazardous environmental exposure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association of surrounding green with incident depression and explore whether and how the association is affected by co-exposure to PM. METHODS: Data were derived from a large-prospective cohort of community-dwelling adults in China. Depression cases were ascertained from local Health Information System linking participants to the health records of hospitals. We estimated the exposure to surrounding green (the average Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI) and particulate matter (PM, predicted by land-use regression models) at the participants' residential addresses. We conducted Cox proportional hazards models upon adjusting a series of potential confounders including sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors and health status, such as self-perceived stress and morbidity. Furthermore, we explored the confounding, interaction and mediation relationship between greenness and particulate matter on the incident depression and estimated the cumulative risk indexes (CRIs). RESULTS:In single exposure models, NDVI was inversely associated with depression incidence. The estimates were attenuated slightly when further adjusted for PM2.5 and PM10. The joint hazard ratio (JHR) of per IQR decrease of NDVI and per IQR increase of PM10 was higher than both in single exposures. Besides, we found the protective effect of greenness was not mediated by PM but was interacted with PM10. CONCLUSIONS:In this large prospective cohort study, residents living in the greener neighborhoods had a lower risk of incident depression. The protective effect was found to be confounded by the PM, since the mediation analysis showed no significance. KEYWORDS: Green space, Particulate matter, Mental health outcomes, Incidence.
City-level Greenness Exposure is Associated with COVID-19 Incidence in China

Wenjia Peng,Yilin Dong,Meihui Tian,Jiacan Yuan,Haidong Kan,Xianjie Jia,Weibing Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112871

IF: 8.3

2022-01-01

Environmental Research

Abstract:Accumulating studies have suggested an important role of environmental factors (e.g. air pollutants) on the occurrence and development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Evidence concerning the relationship of greenness on COVID-19 is still limited. This study aimed to assess the association between greenness and COVID19 incidence in 266 Chinese cities. A total of 12,377 confirmed COVID-19 cases were identified through February 29th, 2020. We used the average normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) during January and February 2020 from MOD13A2 product, to represent the city-level greenness exposure. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate the association between NDVI exposure and COVID-19 incidence using COVID-19 cases as the outcome. We evaluated whether the association was modified by population density, GDP per capita, and urbanization rate, and was mediated by air pollutants. We also performed a series of sensitivity analyses to discuss the robustness of our results. Per 0.1 unit increment in NDVI was negatively associated with COVID-19 incidence (IRR: 0.921, 95% CI: 0.898, 0.944) after adjustment for confounders. Associations with COVID-19 incidence were stronger in cities with lower population density, lower GDP per capita, and lower urbanization rate. We failed to detect any mediation effect of air pollutants on the association between NDVI and COVID-19 incidence. Sensitivity analyses also indicated consistent estimates. In conclusion, our study suggested a beneficial association between city-level greenness and COVID-19 incidence. We could not establish which mechanisms may explain this relationship.
HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C and infertility: Reducing risk

C. Gilling-smith,P. Almeida

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1464770312331369343

2003-01-01

Human Fertility

Abstract:Summary Fertility units should base their decision on whether or not to treat patients infected with HIV, HBV or HCV on the basis of the facilities they can provide, in line with these guidelines, and the views of their local ethics committee and staff members. The decision to treat a couple should be assessed purely in terms of the welfare of the child, and if risk-reduction treatment cannot be provided locally, a referral should be made to a specialist clinic that can provide care according to the standards described in the above guidelines.
Residential Greenness, Air Pollution, and Incident Ischemic Heart Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study in China

Tiezheng Li,Zhebin Yu,XU Li-sha,Yonghao Wu,Luhua Yu,Zongming Yang,Menglin Tang,Minjuan Jin,Kun Chen,Jianbin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2022.p-0820

2022-01-01

ISEE Conference Abstracts

Abstract:Background and aim: Green living environments are associated with beneficial health outcomes, whereas higher air pollution exposure might increase the risk of chronic diseases. Moreover, few studies have explored the interaction between residential greenness and air pollution on the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Therefore we aimed to estimate the associations of residential greenness and air pollution with IHD and their interaction. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study that included 29,141 adult participants recruited from Yinzhou District, Ningbo, China. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) around each participant's residence was calculated to measure residential greenness exposure. Land-use regression models were conducted to estimate long-term individual exposure to air pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ≤10 μm (PM10). Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association of residential greenness and air pollutants with the risk of incident IHD. Results: During 101,172.5 person-years of follow-up, 1,392 incident IHD cases were reported in the study population. Residential greenness, expressed as an interquartile range (IQR) increase in NDVI within 300m, was inversely associated with incident IHD. However, long-term air pollution exposures were associated with higher IHD incidence. Mediation analyses suggested that the beneficial effect of residential greenness on incident IHD could be partly mediated by reducing the exposure to PM2.5. Conclusion: Higher greenness was associated with decreased risk of IHD, while air pollutants were positively associated with incident IHD. Meanwhile, residential greenness may decrease the risk of IHD by reducing PM2.5 exposure. Keywords: Residential greenness; Air pollution; Ischemic heart disease; Cohort study; Effect mediation
Green spaces mitigate racial disparity of health: A higher ratio of green spaces indicates a lower racial disparity in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in the USA

Yi Lu,Long Chen,Xueming Liu,Yuwen Yang,William C Sullivan,Wenyan Xu,Chris Webster,Bin Jiang,William C. Sullivan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106465

IF: 11.8

2021-07-01

Environment International

Abstract:There is striking racial disparity in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates in the United States. We hypothesize that the disparity is significantly smaller in areas with a higher ratio of green spaces. County level data on the SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of black and white individuals in 135 of the most urbanized counties across the United States were collected. The total population in these counties is 132,350,027, comprising 40.3% of the U.S. population. The ratio of green spaces by land-cover type in each county was extracted from satellite imagery. A hierarchical regression analysis measured cross-sectional associations between racial disparity in infection rates and green spaces, after controlling for socioeconomic, demographic, pre-existing chronic disease, and built-up area factors. We found a higher ratio of green spaces at the county level is significantly associated with a lower racial disparity in infection rates. Four green space factors have significant negative associations with the racial disparity in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates. Five core mechanisms and one circumstantial mechanism are identified to interpret the findings.

environmental sciences
Green spaces, especially nearby forest, may reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate: A nationwide study in the United States

Bin Jiang,Yuwen Yang,Long Chen,Xueming Liu,Xueying Wu,Bin Chen,Chris Webster,William C. Sullivan,Linda Larsen,Jingjing Wang,Yi Lu,Bin Jiang,Yuwen Yang,Long Chen,Xueming Liu,Xueying Wu,Bin Chen,Chris Webster,Linda Larsen,Jingjing Wang,Yi Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104583

IF: 8.119

2022-12-01

Landscape and Urban Planning

Abstract:The coronavirus pandemic is an ongoing global crisis that has profoundly harmed public health. Although studies found exposure to green spaces can provide multiple health benefits, the relationship between exposure to green spaces and the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate is unclear. This is a critical knowledge gap for research and practice. In this study, we examined the relationship between total green space, seven types of green space, and a year of SARS-CoV-2 infection data across 3,108 counties in the contiguous United States, after controlling for spatial autocorrelation and multiple types of covariates. First, we examined the association between total green space and SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. Next, we examined the association between different types of green space and SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. Then, we examined forest–infection rate association across five time periods and five urbanicity levels. Lastly, we examined the association between infection rate and population-weighted exposure to forest at varying buffer distances (100 m to 4 km). We found that total green space was negative associated with the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. Furthermore, two forest variables (forest outside park and forest inside park) had the strongest negative association with the infection rate, while open space variables had mixed associations with the infection rate. Forest outside park was more effective than forest inside park. The optimal buffer distances associated with lowest infection rate are within 1,200 m for forest outside park and within 600 m for forest inside park. Altogether, the findings suggest that green spaces, especially nearby forest, may significantly mitigate risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

environmental studies,ecology,geography, physical,regional & urban planning,urban studies
A higher ratio of green spaces means a lower racial disparity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection rates: A nationwide study of the United States

Yi Lu,Long Chen,Xueming Liu,Yuwen Yang,Wenyan Xu,Chris Webster,William C. Sullivan,Bin Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.11.20228130

2020-11-13

Abstract:Abstract There is striking racial disparity in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates in the United States. We hypothesize that the disparity is significantly smaller in areas with a higher ratio of green spaces at the county level. This study used the 135 most urbanized counties across the United States as sample sites. County level data on the SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of black and white individuals in each county were collected. The ratio of green spaces by land-cover type at the county level was calculated from satellite imagery. An ecological hierarchical regression analysis measured cross-sectional associations between racial disparity in infection rates and green spaces, after controlling for socioeconomic, demographic, pre-existing chronic disease, and built-up area factors. We found significantly higher infection rate among black individuals compared to white individuals. More importantly, a higher ratio of green spaces at the county level is significantly associated with a lower racial disparity in the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate. Further, we identified four green space factors that have significant negative associations with the racial disparity in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, including open space in developed areas, forest, shrub and scrub, and grassland and herbaceous. We suggest that green spaces are an equalizing salutogenic factor, modifying infection exposure. Highlights The first study to identify significant relationships between green spaces and the racial disparity of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates. A nationwide study of the 135 most urbanized counties of the United States. A within-subject study: The black-white racial disparity of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates was measured within each county. A higher ratio of green spaces in a county is associated with a lower racial disparity of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates after controlling for socio-economic, demographic, pre-existing chronic disease, and built-up area factors. Four green space factors are significantly associated with a lower racial disparity of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates.
A Global Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Greenspaces on COVID‐19 Infection and Mortality Rates

Bopaki Phogole,Kowiyou Yessoufou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gh001110

2024-10-12

GeoHealth

Abstract:The COVID‐19 outbreak in 2020 resulted in rapidly rising infection rates with high associated mortality rates. In response, several epidemiological studies aimed to define ways in which the spread and severity of COVID‐19 can be curbed. As a result, there is a steady increase in the evidence linking greenspaces and COVID‐19 impact. However, the evidence of the benefits of greenspaces or greenness to human wellbeing in the context of COVID‐19 is fragmented and sometimes contradictory. This calls for a meta‐analysis of existing studies to clarify the matter. Here, we identified 621 studies across the world on the matter, which were then filtered down to 13 relevant studies for meta‐analysis, covering Africa, Asia, Europe, and the USA. These studies were meta‐analyzed, with the impacts of greenness on COVID‐19 infection rate quantified using regression estimates whereas impacts on mortality rates were measured using mortality rate ratios. We found evidence of significant negative correlations between greenness and both COVID‐19 infection and mortality rates. We further found that the impacts on COVID‐19 infection and related mortality are moderated by year of publication, greenness metrics, sample size, health and political covariates. This clarification has far‐reaching implications for policy development toward the establishment and management of green infrastructure for the benefit of human wellbeing.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Is indoor and outdoor greenery associated with fewer depressive symptoms during COVID-19 lockdowns? A mechanistic study in Shanghai, China

Jinguang Zhang,Jie Liu,Yingyi Cheng,Bing Zhao,Payam Dadvand,Matthew H.E.M. Browning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109799

IF: 7.093

2022-11-15

Building and Environment

Abstract:Increasing numbers of studies have observed that indoor and outdoor greenery is associated with fewer depressive symptoms during COVID-19 lockdowns. However, most of these studies examined direct associations without sufficient attention to underlying pathways. Furthermore, very few studies have comprehensively combined different indoor and outdoor greenery to examine their effects on the alleviation of depressive symptoms. The present study hypothesized that indoor and outdoor exposure to greenery increased the perceived restorativeness of the home environments, which in turn reduced loneliness, COVID-related fears, and, ultimately, depressive symptoms. To validate our hypotheses, we conducted an online survey with 386 respondents in Shanghai, China, from April to May 2022, which corresponded to strict citywide lockdowns that resulted from the outbreak of the Omicron variant. Indoor greenery measures included the number of house plants, gardening activities, and digital nature exposure as well as semantic image segmentation applied to photographs from the most viewed windows to quantify indoor exposure to outdoor trees and grass. Outdoor greenery measures included total vegetative cover (normalized difference vegetation index [NDVI]) within a 300 m radius from the home and perceived quality of the community's greenery. Associations between greenery and depressive symptoms/clinical levels of depression, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were examined using generalized linear and logistic regression models. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test pathways between greenery exposure, restorativeness, loneliness, fear of COVID-19, and depressive symptoms. The results showed that: 1) indoor and outdoor greenery was associated with fewer depressive symptoms; 2) greenery could increase the restorativeness of the home environment, which, in turn, was associated with fewer COVID-related mental stressors (i.e., loneliness and fear of COVID-19), and ultimately depressive symptoms; and 3) gender, education, and income did not modify associations between greenery and depressive symptoms. These findings are among the first to combine objective and subjective measures of greenery within and outside of the home and document their effects on mental health, in general, and on lockdown-related mental health outcomes, in particular. Comprehensive enhancements of greenery in living environments could be nature-based solutions for mitigating COVID-19 related mental stressors.

engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil
Green space justice amid COVID-19: Unequal access to public green space across American neighborhoods

Shuqi Gao,Wei Zhai,Xinyu Fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1055720

IF: 5.2

2023-02-02

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Countries around the world have resorted to issuing stay-at-home orders to slow viral transmission since the COVID-19 pandemic. During the lockdown, access to public park plays a central role in the public health of surrounding communities. However, we know little about how such an unprecedented policy may exacerbate the preexisting unequal access to green space (i.e., green space justice). To address this research void, we used difference-in-difference models to examine socioeconomic disparities, urban-rural disparities, and mobility disparities in terms of public park access in the United States. Our national analysis using the weekly mobile phone movement data robustly suggests the following three key findings during COVID-19: (1) The elderly, non-college-educated people, poor people, and blacks are less likely to visit public parks frequently, while unemployed people appear to be the opposite. (2) Compared to rural areas, populations in urban neighborhoods appear to visit public parks more frequently and they generally go to larger parks to minimize the risk of infection. (3) Populations in neighborhoods with higher private vehicle ownership or those with a higher density of transit stops would more frequently visit and travel a longer distance to public parks during the stay-at-home order. Our results imply that conventional inequality in green space access may still exist and even become worse during COVID-19, which could negatively impact people's health during isolation. We suggest that special attention should be paid to park-poor neighborhoods during the pandemic and in the post-pandemic recovery phase.

public, environmental & occupational health
Perceptions of green space usage, abundance, and quality of green space were associated with better mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic among residents of Denver

Colleen E. Reid,Emma S. Rieves,Kate Carlson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263779

IF: 3.7

2022-03-02

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted both physical and mental health. This study aimed to understand whether exposure to green space buffered against stress and distress during the COVID-19 pandemic while taking into account significant stressors of the pandemic. Methods We leveraged a cross-sectional survey on green space exposure and mental health among residents of Denver, CO that ran from November 2019 through January 2021. We measured objective green space as the average NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) from aerial imagery within 300m and 500m of the participant’s residence. Perceived green space was measured through Likert scores on five questions about vegetation near the home that captured perceived abundance, visibility, access, usage, and quality of green space. We used generalized linear models to assess the relationship between each green space exposure variable and perceived stress (PSS-4), depression (CES-D-10), or anxiety (MMPI-2) adjusted for sociodemographic and COVID-19 impact variables. Results We found significantly higher depression scores for all covid periods compared to the “before covid” period, and significantly higher anxiety scores during the “fall wave” compared to earlier periods. Adjusted for sociodemographic and pandemic stressors, we found that spending a lot of time in green space (usage) was significantly associated with lower anxiety and depression. We also observed significantly lower depression scores associated with NDVI in both buffers (objective abundance) and significantly lower anxiety scores with perceived abundance of green space. There was some evidence of lower anxiety scores for people reporting having high quality green spaces near the home (quality). We did not observe significant associations for any green space metric and perceived stress after adjustment for confounding variables. Conclusion Our work provides further evidence of mental health benefits associated with green space exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic even after adjustment for sociodemographic variables and significant pandemic-related stressors.

multidisciplinary sciences
Racial disparities in environmental exposures and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates: A detailed population-weighted analysis

Wenyan Xu,Bin Jiang,William C. Sullivan,Chris Webster,Yi Lu,Na Chen,Zhaowu Yu,Bin Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105135

IF: 11.7

2023-12-25

Sustainable Cities and Society

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has cast a spotlight on the intersection of socio-economic, demographic, and environmental factors with public health, particularly in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates. A gap remains in understanding how racial disparities in environmental exposure correlate with racial disparities in infection rates. This study bridges this gap by analyzing infection data for black and white populations across 1,416 counties in the contiguous United States, utilizing high-resolution land cover data and racial population maps to assess environmental exposure disparities. We found significant connections between racial disparities in environmental exposure and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, even after accounting for population density, socio-economic status, and demographic factors. Disparities among black and white population's access to green spaces, such as non-park forests and pasture/hay areas, as well as to developed areas of varying intensities, closely mirror racial disparities in infection rates. Crucially, we found that smaller differences in environmental exposure between races are associated with smaller differences in infection rates. This relationship is most pronounced within a 400-meter radius, underscoring the critical role of proximity in the design of urban and landscape environments to promote public health equity.

energy & fuels,construction & building technology,green & sustainable science & technology
Interaction between residential greenness and air pollution mortality: analysis of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey

John S Ji,Anna Zhu,Yuebin Lv,Xiaoming Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30027-9

IF: 28.75

2020-03-01

The Lancet Planetary Health

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Both air pollution and green space have been shown to affect health. We aimed to assess whether greenness protects against air pollution-related mortality.METHODS: We used data from the 2008 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. We calculated contemporaneous normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the 500 m radius around each participant's residence. Fine particulate matter (PM2·5) concentration was calculated using 3-year average concentrations in 1 km × 1 km grid resolution. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the effects of NDVI, PM2·5, and their interaction on all-cause mortality, adjusted for a range of covariates.FINDINGS: The cohort contained 12 873 participants, totalling 47 884 person-years. There were 7426 deaths between 2008 and 2014. The mean contemporaneous NDVI was 0·42 (SD 0·21), and the mean 3-year average PM2·5 was 49·63 μg/m3 (13·72). In the fully adjusted model, the mortality hazard ratio for each 0·1-unit decrease in contemporaneous NDVI was 1·08 (95% CI 1·03-1·13), each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2·5 was 1·13 (1·09-1·18), and the interaction term was 1·01 (1·00-1·02) with a p value of 0·027. We observed non-linear associations in our stratified analyses: people living in urban areas were more likely to benefit from greenness, and people living in rural areas were more likely to be harmed by air pollution.INTERPRETATION: Our study showed some indication of a synergistic effect of greenness and air pollution, suggesting that green space planning and air pollution control can jointly improve public health.FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Thinking beyond general greenness: The nuanced associations between a variety of greenspaces and cardiovascular diseases across urbanicity

Yuwen Yang,Bin Jiang,Lan Wang,Yuyu Zhou,Bo Li,Peng Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105223

IF: 8.119

2024-09-28

Landscape and Urban Planning

Abstract:Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading causes of death globally. Exposure to greenspaces has been proposed to be beneficial for CVDs. However, past studies have often overlooked how varying levels of urbanicity may differently impact the relationships between greenspaces and cardiovascular health. Moreover, different types of greenspaces uniquely affect people's behaviors and psychological wellbeing, potentially yielding distinct effects on CVDs.This study investigates the associations between population-weighted exposure to various types of greenspaces and prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke in the US at tract level, and whether these associations are modified by urbanicity.We identified a contrasting difference in health effects between greenspaces inside and outside park. Neighbourhoods with more forest (CHD β = −2.99, 95 % CI: −4.25, −1.73; stroke β = −1.85, 95 % CI: −2.56, −1.13) and open space (CHD β = −4.31, 95 % CI: −5.49, −3.14; stroke β = −2.33, 95 % CI: −3.00, −1.66) inside park were associated with a lower prevalence of CVDs, whereas more forest (CHD β = 7.67, 95 % CI: 5.81, 9.54; stroke β = 3.01, 95 % CI: 1.95, 4.07) and open space (CHD β = 11.52, 95 % CI: 9.99, 13.05; stroke β = 5.77, 95 % CI:4.90, 6.64) outside park were associated with a higher prevalence of CVDs. We observed a reversal pattern across urbanicity: the significant beneficial associations only held in highly urbanized tracts but attenuated or reversed in the three less urbanized tracts.These findings highlight a need to prioritize investment in parks within walking distance to urban residents and improve the accessibility and design of rural greenspaces. We propose the Landscape Compensation Effect, which may serve as a new theoretical framework to guide future research and design practices of greenspaces to promote the cardiovascular health of both urban and rural residents.

environmental studies,ecology,geography, physical,regional & urban planning,urban studies
Urban greenery cushions the decrease in leisure-time physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A natural experimental study

Yiyang Yang,Yi Lu,Linchuan Yang,Zhonghua Gou,Ye Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127136

2021-07-01

Abstract:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related social distancing measures have altered the daily lifestyles of people worldwide. Although studies on this disease are emerging rapidly, less is known about the impacts of COVID-19 and urban greenery on leisure-time physical activity, which is critical to maintain health for urban residents during the pandemic. In this study, we used a natural experimental research design to identify whether urban greenery cushions the decrease in leisure-time physical activity caused by the pandemic and related social distancing measures in a high-density city. The two-wave physical activity data (before and during the pandemic) were collected for urban residents in neighborhoods with high or low levels of greenery. The results of difference-in-differences model suggest that urban greenery mitigated the decrease in physical activity during the pandemic. People who lived in greener neighborhoods experienced a lesser decrease in the leisure-time physical activity level than those who lived in less green neighborhoods. Additionally, people who lived in greener neighborhoods experienced increased levels of physical activity related to visits to country parks during the pandemic. These findings suggest that urban green spaces play a significant role in shaping physical activity and providing a refuge for the public during crises. Our study is among the first to investigate the impact of urban greenery on pandemic-induced changes in leisure-time physical activity in densely populated Asian cities, and our findings shed light on the potential protective role of urban greenery on public health during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

environmental studies,urban studies,forestry
Neighborhood greenness associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide cross-sectional study in China

Jing Fan,Yawei Guo,Zheng Cao,Shu Cong,Ning Wang,Hualiang Lin,Chongjian Wang,Heling Bao,Xueli Lv,Baohua Wang,Yi Gao,Yahong Chen,Ting Yang,Linhong Wang,Chen Wang,Zengliang Ruan,Liwen Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106042

IF: 11.8

2020-11-01

Environment International

Abstract:Differential findings have been reported on the association between neighborhood greenness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The underlying reasons might be the different types of vegetation and the diagnosis methods used in different studies. In this nationwide cross-sectional study in China, we examined the linkage between neighborhood greenness and COPD prevalence among 66,752 adults aged 40 years and above. Neighborhood greenness was estimated using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) based on satellite imagery within buffers of 100, 300, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 5000 m of residential community of the participants. COPD was defined according to the 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease lung function criteria. A two-level logistic regression model was applied to estimate the associations. Finally, 9134 adults were classified as COPD. We observed significant positive associations between neighborhood greenness and COPD prevalence. The odds ratio for each interquartile range increase in NDVI within 100 m buffer was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.15) after adjustment for potential confounders. Consistent associations were observed across all other NDVI buffer sizes. Stratified analyses revealed that younger adults (40–65 years) and urban residents might be the vulnerable subpopulations. Further regional analyses found that residents from the Northeastern and Northern China were more likely to have this association. Our results indicated that neighborhood greenness might be one risk factor of COPD prevalence. Our study have important public health implications for allocating the surrounding green spaces among living areas, especially for those with respiratory illness; however, the findings and the underlying mechanisms warrant further examinations in longitudinal settings.

environmental sciences
The impact of green space on nonaccidental and cause-specific mortality in the Adventist Health Study-2 population

Holly Hreha,Rhonda Spencer-Hwang,Synnove Knutsen,David Shavlik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000332

2024-08-14

Abstract:Background: There is growing interest in evaluating the long-term health effects of neighborhood environments, particularly green space. However, only a limited body of research further incorporates multiple ambient air pollutants. Methods: This study looked at the relationship between green space, as measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and mortality adjusted by key confounders in the Adventist Health Study-2, a longitudinal cohort study from 2002 to 2015, across the contiguous United States (N = 67,400). We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to assess the risk of nonaccidental, cardiovascular disease (CVD), ischemic heart disease (IHD), and respiratory disease mortality from green space around subjects' home address under multiple covariate and pollutant adjustments. Results: We found a 0.1 unit increase in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index was associated with nonaccidental (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 0.99]), CVD (HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.98]), and IHD (HR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.94]) mortality, with the greatest precision in fully adjusted three-pollutant models using the 1000-m buffer. Effect estimates were strengthened in urban areas, when incorporating seasons, and for females. However, all associations between green space and respiratory mortality were null. Conclusion: This study supports evidence that increased neighborhood green space is inversely associated with nonaccidental, CVD, and IHD mortality, where the inclusion of multiple environmental covariates had a greater impact on effect estimate magnitude and precision than adjustment by individual lifestyle and health factors.
Green Spaces in Highly Urbanized Tracts Tied to Lower Prevalence of Respiratory Diseases: A Nationwide Study Across Levels of Urbanicity

YANG Yuwen,Bin JIANG,Yuwen YANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128149

IF: 5.766

2023-11-16

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

Abstract:Previous studies have found conflicting results between green space and respiratory diseases, possibly due to the use of generalized green space measures and the diverse urbanicity levels in which they were conducted. Few nationwide studies examined how urbanicity modifies the relationship between green spaces and respiratory diseases while considering the geospatial relation between green space and human population, population density, and accessibility. This study evaluates the relationships between population-weighted forest and open space exposure (inside and outside park), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma in the contiguous United States. The COPD and asthma data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The green space exposure within an 800 m buffer was computed using National Land-cover Dataset and WorldPop Global Population Data. The associations were estimated using spatial error models and adjusted for important covariates. We also performed stratified analyses by four urbanicity levels. Green spaces inside but not outside park were associated with a lower prevalence of COPD and asthma. We found that a 1 m 2 increase in forest inside park was associated with a decrease of 3.57 and 2.97 cases per 100,000 population in COPD and asthma, and a 1 m 2 increase in open space inside park was associated with a decrease of 4.82 and 7.66 cases per 100,000 population in COPD and asthma. A trend of an inverse relationship was observed across urbanicity: the beneficial associations occurred in highly urbanized tracts but not in the three less-urbanized tracts. Our results provide further evidence that nearby forests and open spaces inside park, in urban but not rural areas, were tied to a lower prevalence of respiratory diseases in the US. The beneficial association suggests the necessity of ensuring access to nearby green spaces, especially those in parks, to promote respiratory health.

environmental studies,urban studies,forestry

VERTICAL RIB EXPANSION FOR THORACIC INSUFFICIENCY SYNDROME-INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUE

Residential Greenness is Associated with Disease Severity among COVID-19 Patients Aged over 45 Years in Wuhan, China

Population-weighted exposure to green spaces tied to lower COVID-19 mortality rates: A nationwide dose-response study in the USA

The Associations of Greenness and Incident Depression with Co-Exposed of Particulate Matter

City-level Greenness Exposure is Associated with COVID-19 Incidence in China

HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C and infertility: Reducing risk

Residential Greenness, Air Pollution, and Incident Ischemic Heart Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study in China

Green spaces mitigate racial disparity of health: A higher ratio of green spaces indicates a lower racial disparity in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in the USA

Green spaces, especially nearby forest, may reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate: A nationwide study in the United States

A higher ratio of green spaces means a lower racial disparity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection rates: A nationwide study of the United States

A Global Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Greenspaces on COVID‐19 Infection and Mortality Rates

Is indoor and outdoor greenery associated with fewer depressive symptoms during COVID-19 lockdowns? A mechanistic study in Shanghai, China

Green space justice amid COVID-19: Unequal access to public green space across American neighborhoods

Perceptions of green space usage, abundance, and quality of green space were associated with better mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic among residents of Denver

Racial disparities in environmental exposures and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates: A detailed population-weighted analysis

Interaction between residential greenness and air pollution mortality: analysis of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey

Thinking beyond general greenness: The nuanced associations between a variety of greenspaces and cardiovascular diseases across urbanicity

Urban greenery cushions the decrease in leisure-time physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A natural experimental study

Neighborhood greenness associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide cross-sectional study in China

The impact of green space on nonaccidental and cause-specific mortality in the Adventist Health Study-2 population

Green Spaces in Highly Urbanized Tracts Tied to Lower Prevalence of Respiratory Diseases: A Nationwide Study Across Levels of Urbanicity