Renal Vasculitis: A Review

G. Neild

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014107688507800814

1985-08-01

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract:Introduction During the past 20 years it has become clear that polyarteritis nodosa, as described by Kussmaul & Maier (1866), is uncommon. In that 'classic' form it is a devastating disease affecting predominantly the larger muscular arteries of the splanchnic organs. However systemic vasculitis involving only the lower orders of the arterial tree is relatively common. Davson and his colleagues (1948) used the term 'microscopic polyarteritis' to describe an arteritis that was detectable only by light microscopy, in contrast to polyarteritis nodosa in which, at autopsy, the vessel involvement was often visible with the naked eye. Arteritis may occur as part of some well characterized systemic disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Henoch-Schoenlein purpura (HSP), or cryoglobulinaemia. These are most conveniently thought of as secondary forms of arteritis (Neild & Williams 1985). However, when these conditions affect the kidney it is their glomerular involvement that dominates the picture (Cameron et al. 1979, Meadows et al. 1972). In other conditions arteritis appears to be the primary disorder. These primary or idiopathic forms of systemic arteritis will be referred to as polyarteritis. This review is about polyarteritis affecting the kidney Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is the most serious manifestation of polyarteritis involving the kidney. RPGN is a rare syndrome characterized (1) clinically by an acute nephritic syndrome with the rapid development of renal failure, and (2) pathologically by a severe crescentic glomerulonephritis. Many patients who present with RPGN have a clinical illness suggestive of a vasculitis (Neild et al. 1983). Davson et al. (1948) were the first to propose that necrotizing glomerulonephritis with crescents might be the sole renal manifestation of polyarteritis. This concept was accepted, and recently Serra et al. (1984) confirmed in a study of renal vasculitis that there were no clinical differences between those in whom vasculitis was apparently confined to the glomerulus and those who had a histologically proven arteritis elsewhere.