Guidelines and avoiding meltdown.

J. Murphy

2011-10-01

Irish Medical Journal

Abstract:The provision of medical care has become more complex and correspondingly more stressful. Patients’ expectations of doctors are high. Poor medical outcomes are in many cases likely to be perceived as physician or surgeon failure rather than the inevitable consequences of the underlying disease. Both the substance and the process of individual cases are closely scrutinised. It is about how you do it as well as what you do. Guidelines, protocols and clinical care pathways are now widely employed in the provision of patient care. They developed out of two requirements. The need to bring uniformity to the management of patients and the need to practice evidence based medicine. The principal is a sound one and has widespread acceptance. Medicine should be delivered to a uniform acceptable standard. Evidence based medicine integrates personal clinical experience with expert external sources. It safeguards one’s clinical practice from becoming out of date to the disadvantage of patients. It provides the standard to which one can benchmark one’s practice. It is understandable that guidelines are strongly promoted as a means to improve patient care. Despite these positives they continue to receive a lukewarm reception in some quarters. The lack of universal acceptance is worthwhile considering and exploring.