Comparison of the in vivo efficiency of photofrin II‐, mTHPC‐, mTHPC‐PEG‐ and mTHPCnPEG‐mediated PDT in a human xenografted head and neck carcinoma

T. Reuther,A. Kübler,U. Zillmann,C. Flechtenmacher,H. Sinn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1123
2001-11-01
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Abstract:One of the approaches to enhance the selectivity and efficiency of photodynamic therapy (PDT) was the conjugation of the photosensitizer meta‐tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) to the water‐soluble polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG). Several studies have demonstrated that mTHPC‐PEG has a higher selectivity and a longer circulating half‐life than free mTHPC, whereas no in vivo effect of this benefit could be seen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?