Abstract:Background: Healthcare costs in most developed countries are not clearly linked to better patient and public health outcomes, but are rather associated with service delivery orientation. In the U.S. this has resulted in large variation in healthcare availability and use, increased cost, reduced employer participation in health insurance programs, and reduced overall population health outcomes. Recent U.S. healthcare reform legislation addresses only some of these issues. Other countries face similar healthcare issues. Discussion: A major goal of healthcare is to enhance patient health outcomes. This objective is not realized in many countries because incentives and structures are currently not aligned for maximizing population health. The misalignment occurs because of the competing interests between "actors" in healthcare. In a simplified model these are individuals motivated to enhance their own health; enterprises (including a mix of nonprofit, for profit and government providers, payers, and suppliers, etc.) motivated by profit, political, organizational and other forces; and government which often acts in the conflicting roles of a healthcare payer and provider in addition to its role as the representative and protector of the people. An imbalance exists between the actors, due to the resources and information control of the enterprise and government actors relative to the individual and the public. Failure to use effective preventive interventions is perhaps the best example of the misalignment of incentives. We consider the current Pareto efficient balance between the actors in relation to the Pareto frontier, and show that a significant change in the healthcare market requires major changes in the utilities of the enterprise and government actors. Summary: A variety of actions are necessary for maximizing population health within the constraints of available resources and the current balance between the actors. These actions include improved transparency of all aspects of medical decision making, greater involvement of patients in shared medical decision making, greater oversight of guideline development and coverage decisions, limitations on direct to consumer advertising, and the need for an enhanced role of the government as the public advocate.

Balancing the Needs of Society and the Individual Patient

Updating the Hippocratic Oath to include medicine's social contract

The Hippocratic principle "to help or at least to do no harm"

Medical ethics and physician motivations

The willingness of community pharmacists to participate in a practice-based research network

Doctors who doctor self, family, and colleagues

Balancing influence between actors in healthcare decision making

Physician autonomy in crisis: examining the right to refuse commitment

Freedom of Conscience in Health Care: Distinctions and Limits

Strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and avoid administrative stifling

Scavenging 4-Oxo-2-nonenal.

Evolving Ethical Issues in Health and Mental Health

Ethics in Practice: Managed Care and the Changing Health Care Environment

Physicians, Cost Control, and Ethics

Understanding the modern relevance of the Hippocratic Oath

Balancing traditional values in academic medicine with advances in science and technology

Failure Mechanisms of Hollow Fiber Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes

Medical confidentiality against disclosure in the public interest: should such protective privilege ends when public peril begins?

Physicians, Spirituality, and Compassionate Patient Care

Association of visfatin with chronic kidney disease in a cohort of patients with and without diabetes.

A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health